<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t use that open API &#8212; it could be a trap!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/07/09/dont-use-that-open-api-it-could-be-a-trap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/07/09/dont-use-that-open-api-it-could-be-a-trap/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 20:25:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Willmott</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/07/09/dont-use-that-open-api-it-could-be-a-trap/#comment-864713</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Willmott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 09:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=540685#comment-864713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it&#039;s definitely worth taking care when building on platforms such as twitter - in particular it&#039;s worth thinking about the business model that makes sense for the provider since this is the main driver of policy - some thoughts on that here: http://www.3scale.net/2012/07/taking-the-long-view-on-api-ecosystems/

I do think in twitter&#039;s case they are grossly underestimating the value of the niches they cover with the API and this move will ultimately hurt them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s definitely worth taking care when building on platforms such as twitter &#8211; in particular it&#8217;s worth thinking about the business model that makes sense for the provider since this is the main driver of policy &#8211; some thoughts on that here: <a href="http://www.3scale.net/2012/07/taking-the-long-view-on-api-ecosystems/" rel="nofollow">http://www.3scale.net/2012/07/taking-the-long-view-on-api-ecosystems/</a></p>
<p>I do think in twitter&#8217;s case they are grossly underestimating the value of the niches they cover with the API and this move will ultimately hurt them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ricdesan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/07/09/dont-use-that-open-api-it-could-be-a-trap/#comment-862252</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ricdesan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 19:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=540685#comment-862252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think all the dancing around the Twitter ecosystem is kind of a non-sequitur in that the core experience of micro-blogging remains consistent for end users and that is what maintains value in the platform.

third party API dev really isnt changing the game enough to matter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think all the dancing around the Twitter ecosystem is kind of a non-sequitur in that the core experience of micro-blogging remains consistent for end users and that is what maintains value in the platform.</p>
<p>third party API dev really isnt changing the game enough to matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
