2 Comments

Summary:

The European Parliament has delivered a stunning defeat to the controversial anti-piracy treaty ACTA, voting it down by 478 votes to 39. But although campaigners are claiming victory and the proposals are on the canvas, they’re not quite knocked out yet.

boxing

European legislators struck a huge blow against the controversial international piracy agreement ACTA on Wednesday, voting the proposals down by a huge margin — with 478 votes against and just 39 votes in its favor.

But, although the result appears to leave the treaty on the canvas, campaigners should be wary: it’s not quite finished yet.

ACTA, the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, is a multinational treaty aimed at curbing the global trade in counterfeit goods of all sorts, and has been the subject of frenzied negotiations (most of them secret) since at least 2008. Supporters say it is intended to harmonize copyright law across much of the world but, over the last few years, however, critics have been attacking for what they believe is a fundamental infringement of civil liberties, particularly when it comes down to digital copying.

Among its most egregious points, they argued, was the radical expansion of copyright law in ways that went far beyond existing national laws. ACTA’s concept of what constituted “commercial” copyright infringement had  broad implications, and it would also make it illegal to circumvent DRM. Over time, the proposals were watered down — for example, the clause allowing border security to search your computer or iPod for copied music was dropped, for example. But many of the most controversial elements remained.

Championed by the European Commission, officials continued to work on the proposals and, by the beginning of this year, the European Union had already signed up in principle, along with countries like the United States and Japan. But as the moment drew closer when Europe would be asked to ratify the treaty — the move that would actually end up with it becoming law — concerns and criticism grew stronger and stronger.

In the wake of the successful SOPA protests in the US, many felt empowered and the movement really culminated in huge protests in Poland and elsewhere in January, where thousands turned out on the streets to make their feelings known.

That added to pressure from influential committees — and by the time the vote came around today, it was roundly rejected by EU parliamentarians.

Some of them celebrated their victory:

But although the vote means that it’s unlikely that ACTA will rise again, it is worth realizing that it is not necessarily dead, either.

European trade commissioner Karel De Gucht — who had been lobbying hard to push the vote through in favor of the treaty — has already said he is so committed to getting ACTA working that he is prepared to come back with an altered version at a later date:

“If you decide for a negative vote before the European Court rules, let me tell you that the Commission will nonetheless continue to pursue the current procedure before the Court, as we are entitled to do. A negative vote will not stop the proceedings before the Court of Justice.”

And although Europe has reject the treaty, it could still end up being ratified by the other signatories — Australia, Canada, Japan, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore, South Korea and the U.S. are all in the frame. Six of them would need to ratify the treaty in order to put it into effect.

Perhaps it’s worth heeding Dutch MEP Marietje Schaake’s thoughts:

  1. Motoko Kusanagi Wednesday, July 4, 2012

    Bad links in the article.

    Also, I would be cautious about claims that what happened in US against SOPA was a significant factor in EU against ACTA. For starters, vast majority of the people who went out to protest weren\’t even aware of SOPA and PIPA. Geeks and nerds might follow tech news from the US (where tech happens, after all), but not the average Joe Shmo (or Jan Kowalski ;).

    Moreover, the opposition to ACTA in Europe – or indeed in Poland, where a mass opposition ignited and was the strongest – has manifested much differently than the anti-SOPA movement in the US. We hardly had any voluntary website blackouts or pressure from internet companies on lawmakers. Our process was much more grass-roots and civic. First, \”hacker\” attacks (mainly DDoS, some defacements) on government websites, then lots of mainstream media attention, then street protests, which fueled more media attention and public debate, which fueled bigger street protests. And then other countries picked up the bug – with Germany being the only other country with significant street protests (in the tens of thousands).

    Share
    1. Bobbie Johnson Thursday, July 5, 2012

      Sorry for bad links. Now fixed.

      I think you’re right in some ways, but there was very little concern about ACTA for the preceding 4 years of negotiations, despite regular attention and some press coverage.

      I think the SOPA protests emboldened a handful of activists and put pressure on legislators who realised they might not want to put their names to this. But you’re right: this was much more motivated by street-level anger than being run from corporate level.

      Share

Comments have been disabled for this post