<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Branch aspires to be a simplified, successful Google Wave</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/07/03/branch-aspires-to-be-a-simplified-successful-google-wave/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/07/03/branch-aspires-to-be-a-simplified-successful-google-wave/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 11:50:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vladimir Kobzev</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/07/03/branch-aspires-to-be-a-simplified-successful-google-wave/#comment-860714</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vladimir Kobzev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 09:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=538933#comment-860714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cool! 100% agree that wave idea is great, we just need to make it easier to understand. IMHO main mistake was about Minimal Valuable product. Wave team tried to make too many features and ideas in one step. Especially about product+platform+protocol:))

In userexpirince point of view. Last year we made a survey with active google wave audience. And we get very interesting results. The main was about &quot;long waves&quot; http://blog.rizzoma.com/2012/01/15/google-wave-necroscopy/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool! 100% agree that wave idea is great, we just need to make it easier to understand. IMHO main mistake was about Minimal Valuable product. Wave team tried to make too many features and ideas in one step. Especially about product+platform+protocol:))</p>
<p>In userexpirince point of view. Last year we made a survey with active google wave audience. And we get very interesting results. The main was about &#8220;long waves&#8221; <a href="http://blog.rizzoma.com/2012/01/15/google-wave-necroscopy/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.rizzoma.com/2012/01/15/google-wave-necroscopy/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dude</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/07/03/branch-aspires-to-be-a-simplified-successful-google-wave/#comment-860457</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 14:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=538933#comment-860457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Err, link? wtf]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Err, link? wtf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
