<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chinese iPad trademark costs Apple $60m</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/07/02/chinese-ipad-trademark-costs-apple-60m/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/07/02/chinese-ipad-trademark-costs-apple-60m/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:55:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: keith williams</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/07/02/chinese-ipad-trademark-costs-apple-60m/#comment-861782</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[keith williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 11:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=538682#comment-861782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thats just one interpretation; the other is that you bought a mickey mouse cuddly toy from a disney store and then claim you own the copyright to its image.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats just one interpretation; the other is that you bought a mickey mouse cuddly toy from a disney store and then claim you own the copyright to its image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thehardcoreapplefan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/07/02/chinese-ipad-trademark-costs-apple-60m/#comment-861695</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thehardcoreapplefan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 03:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=538682#comment-861695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is just so sick. I will tell you what, those people are pretty greedy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is just so sick. I will tell you what, those people are pretty greedy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/07/02/chinese-ipad-trademark-costs-apple-60m/#comment-859793</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tyler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 19:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=538682#comment-859793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It just seems screwed up to me. Apple did BUY the trademark! The fact that the parent company allowed the subsidiary to sell, and then the courts didn&#039;t honor that sale seems messed up, unless I&#039;m missing something.  Seems to me that&#039;s the same as FORD coming to me 11 years later saying I owe $36,000 plus interest and a percentage of the profits I made when using the van that I bought from the local FORD dealer, but because I bought it from the dealer, and not FORD, I still owe money.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It just seems screwed up to me. Apple did BUY the trademark! The fact that the parent company allowed the subsidiary to sell, and then the courts didn&#8217;t honor that sale seems messed up, unless I&#8217;m missing something.  Seems to me that&#8217;s the same as FORD coming to me 11 years later saying I owe $36,000 plus interest and a percentage of the profits I made when using the van that I bought from the local FORD dealer, but because I bought it from the dealer, and not FORD, I still owe money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
