8 Comments

Summary:

Despite the “Google+ is a ghost town” mantra, a number of high-profile people are active users. They also yelp when they’re unhappy and when Google+ Events went live, flooding feeds, that’s what some of them did — drawing attention to a launch for all the wrong reasons.

flood

Despite the “Google+ is a ghost town” mantra, a number of high-profile or widely connected people are active users who promote what they like. They also yelp when they’re unhappy and when Google+ Events went live during the week’s Google I/O, flooding feeds and stuffing calendars, that’s what some of them did — drawing attention to a launch for all the wrong reasons.

Actor/geek Wil Wheaton started to see the results almost immediately, posting late Wednesday afternoon:

Did G+ roll out some new “invite everyone you follow to an event” thing? My feed is completely overwhelmed with “everyone’s invited to XXXXX event” notices, and I’m having a hard time actually seeing posts from people I’m following. … Is there a way to opt-out of event invites from people I don’t follow or have circled? Is this yet another thing Google rolled out without thinking it through clearly?

A little later, he was getting a better understanding of the new feature but it was too late:

It’s too bad that I’ll never use it, and will kill it with fire, because Google has, yet again, made a product that may be useful and cool, but forced it upon users without giving users any control over how invasive it is.

Wheaton not only has a large following, he’s an active poster and checkers his Google+ feed every half hour or so when he’s online. He likes Google+ and is just as frustrated by what he sees as Google’s failure with it as he was with this feature gone awry:

Instead of talking about how cool this thing is, and how excited we are to use it, a significant number of G+ users — and people like Linus Torvalds, who are way more influential than I am are among them — are talking about how annoyed they are and how much they hate it.

Is that the rollout that Google was hoping for? Has Google learned nothing from doing things like this in the past? I’m starting to believe that this isn’t an accident, or poor planning, but by design; I just can’t figure out why.

Author John Scalzi was irked enough to post around midnight Wednesday:

My newest circle is “People who send me a ‘test’ Google Events Invite, and must therefore be torn apart by ravenous bears.” Try not to be in it. The bears are getting tired.

By Thursday, Wheaton was trying again, providing examples, to back up his contention that only people in your own circles should be allowed to send you Events. Among them: unwanted invitations and messages about the Guild Wars 2 release date. The last straw was someone who set up a fake event with Wheaton’s name in it, prompting him to warn “the system as it’s set up right now is ripe for abuse.”

That finally drew a chagrined response in Wheaton’s comments from Vic Gundotra, the Google SVP of engineering responsible for Google+:

“We are doing exactly what you requested. We should have contemplated and anticipated how people would abuse this and how painful this could be for celebrities with large followings.

We have pushed a number of fixes yesterday (some were bug fixes that showed up at scale). Expect more fixes today. Sorry for the trouble Will.”

The right response, although Gundotra shouldn’t have limited it to “celebrities” and should have been more clear about the fixes and bugs.

An exasperated Robert Scoble was still dealing with the aftereffects late Thursday afternoon when he broadcast on Google+ and Twitter that Google+ Events was “The worst social launch ever. WTF were you thinking Google?” He called out Gundotra directly, adding a new twist:

Not only did it spam the crap out of my notifications and my Google+ events page but it added events — hundreds of them — onto my calendar.

My calendar is MINE. Not yours. You should NEVER put anything on it that I don’t approve of.

Scoble said declining the events didn’t make them disappear, requiring hundreds of entries to be deleted by one by one. It’s not the end of the world but it’s the kind of tech time sink that can frustrate to the point of a primal scream.

Google also is showing an Events opt-in screen on Google Calendar. I was in a rush when I first saw it and decided to adhere to a rule I’ve been trying to follow: don’t opt in if you don’t have time to read the fine print.

Even now, it’s difficult to see from the splash screen or the “learn more” page just how much noise you might be agreeing to if you opt in.

If you look at events through Google+ instead of your Google calendar, you can start to figure it out by choosing settings and scrolling around a lot. There is still no simple or direct way to set parameters specifically for events, as far as I can tell.

Google needs Google+ Events to work for a number of reasons: it encourages interaction between features like Google+, calendar and Gmail; it’s social so should bring more Google+ users together; it encourages photo sharing; and it should bring new users in.

If Google can manage the parachute-bike-rappel routine that wowed the Moscone Center crowd, someone there ought to be able to figure out how to introduce new features without alienating its users.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. Answwer is these celeb didn’t try alender till this day….
    here is the answer to the prob
    https://plus.google.com/113094980234917686027/posts/35XgWSEzCbn

  2. atarifrosch Friday, June 29, 2012

    You quoted Robert Scoble saying: ‘My calendar is MINE. Not yours. You should NEVER put anything on it that I don’t approve of.’

    No. It is not his. If you’re not paying for it, you are the product. (In this case: your data.) Use a calendar on your local device (or smart phone) or on a vps, then you can say “it’s mine”.

    1. Without arguing who owns what, what if you do pay for the Google Calendar through Google apps, which a lot of people and companies do (including this one)?

      1. I think in that case you pay for the app, not for the service. The app is just a tool to make (better, easyer, whatever) use of the service. The service as such is still “free”, you could also use it without the app.

  3. Scoble never used G+ like G+, instead forcing it to be another FB for him, to begin with so I’m not surprised he would have problems with G+ doing about anything different than FB.

  4. When a company messes with tools they’ve provided, it’s completely understandable that there’s a little bit of freaking and some displeasure about changes and/or reluctance to accept them. It’s especially bad if they break something or there is a malfunction. So I get that it’s frustrating and can be hassle…But the reactions of seemingly informed & high profile people like this, the sheer sense of entitlement, and the *outrage* over hiccups the day a company launches something new. Get offline and go make a film, Wil or ship a fucking product, Robert. It’s one thing to vent, it’s another to use your celebrity to be a big cry baby about something vastly complex you get to use for free…to promote yourself professional. I would embarrassed of this post if I were them.

  5. Nicole Simon Friday, June 29, 2012

    The point is: If this would be a clueless startups, I might be willing to overlook this. But many times now Google (and other big corporations) have shown that they did not do the homework.

    Ask *anybody* with some experience and they would have been able to rattle down exactly that list of concerns as well as what not to do.

    Clients laugh (initially) at me when I say “you tell me what you plan and I tell you why this is stupid” but this is exactly what this is. btw I am not that clever – you are just that stupid.

    There is not 5 techies working at google, there is more than enough people who should have been around and point *exactly* that out and that is why I am unforgiving about this. If you let this out and did not forsee this happening, you should think about a different career path with less responsibility.

    Additionally to the effect of flooding the stream, flodding my inbox and my calendar until I noticed it, it makes G+ less effective to use. And I am saying this as somebody who wants this feature badly and use it badly – but now most of the people will have aversion against it.

    Somebody give the popcorn …

  6. Greg Schwartz Friday, June 29, 2012

    Will Wheaton and anyone else who is intrigued by Google+ Events but frustrated by its shortcomings should check out UpTo. UpTo is a calendar event sharing solution that we recently launched on iPhone. It’s spam free, works with any calendar, isn’t limited to Google+ and gives users total control over which events get shared and with whom. Check it out at http://upto.com

Comments have been disabled for this post