Comments on: Square addresses #1 request: better security for multiple workers http://gigaom.com/2012/06/27/square-addresses-1-request-separate-log-ins-for-multiple-workers/ Sat, 25 May 2013 19:14:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: olukay0de http://gigaom.com/2012/06/27/square-addresses-1-request-separate-log-ins-for-multiple-workers/#comment-858089 Thu, 28 Jun 2012 11:35:27 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=536940#comment-858089 Reblogged this on Olukayode Aluko, MNSE.

]]> By: Jay Pfoutz http://gigaom.com/2012/06/27/square-addresses-1-request-separate-log-ins-for-multiple-workers/#comment-857736 Wed, 27 Jun 2012 18:36:40 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=536940#comment-857736 I think if the organizations are keeping a close eye to who’s logging in, and allowing only organization-based users the access, it should be fine.

Otherwise, this could very well be another bad security risking app, FWIW.

]]> By: Michael Murray http://gigaom.com/2012/06/27/square-addresses-1-request-separate-log-ins-for-multiple-workers/#comment-857685 Wed, 27 Jun 2012 17:09:07 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=536940#comment-857685 I want Square! (currently not available in Canada) :(

]]> By: John Conaway http://gigaom.com/2012/06/27/square-addresses-1-request-separate-log-ins-for-multiple-workers/#comment-857633 Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:18:21 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=536940#comment-857633 I want recurring payments.

]]>