<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: What a photographer thinks of Aperture 3.3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/06/23/review-what-a-photographer-thinks-of-aperture-3-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/06/23/review-what-a-photographer-thinks-of-aperture-3-3/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:42:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/06/23/review-what-a-photographer-thinks-of-aperture-3-3/#comment-859522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 23:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=535392#comment-859522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a professional photographer and use Aperture every day in my workflow. I have heard of photographers having issues with speed &amp; stability but I am happy to report that I have never suffer such problems.
I find the latest version 3.3 faster especially on import. I have just completed a shoot yesterday and had to Edit 1800 raw images with no performance issues at all.
Joeseph at aperture expert did a comparison test between aperture, lightroom and photo mechanics. You may find the results interesting.
http://www.apertureexpert.com/tips/2012/6/19/import-browse-test-aperture-vs-lightroom-vs-photo-mechanic.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a professional photographer and use Aperture every day in my workflow. I have heard of photographers having issues with speed &amp; stability but I am happy to report that I have never suffer such problems.<br />
I find the latest version 3.3 faster especially on import. I have just completed a shoot yesterday and had to Edit 1800 raw images with no performance issues at all.<br />
Joeseph at aperture expert did a comparison test between aperture, lightroom and photo mechanics. You may find the results interesting.<br />
<a href="http://www.apertureexpert.com/tips/2012/6/19/import-browse-test-aperture-vs-lightroom-vs-photo-mechanic.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.apertureexpert.com/tips/2012/6/19/import-browse-test-aperture-vs-lightroom-vs-photo-mechanic.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil2</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/06/23/review-what-a-photographer-thinks-of-aperture-3-3/#comment-856574</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 16:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=535392#comment-856574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quite disapointed with this article. With due respect, Mark is NOT a professional photographer, he&#039;s a freelance writer with a camera.

A couple of years ago I downloaded version 2 of Aperture and Lightroom and loaded the same wedding shoot on each. What a calamity. Aperture was so slow, so unusable, so horribly inadequate that I immediately bought Lightroom and didn&#039;t look back.
How is it possible for Adobe to create an app that flies when Apple cannot???

Foolishly though I bought Aperture 3.3 on a whim from the App Store and I thought I&#039;d give it another try. 
My opinion in one sentence: 
Apple is NOT, repeat ***NOT*** serious about this program in any way shape or form. 

For Mark and the millions of shutterbugs out there it may suffice, particularly for the price, but as a professional tool it&#039;s hopeless.
If your camera pays your mortgage, feel free to critique my assessment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite disapointed with this article. With due respect, Mark is NOT a professional photographer, he&#8217;s a freelance writer with a camera.</p>
<p>A couple of years ago I downloaded version 2 of Aperture and Lightroom and loaded the same wedding shoot on each. What a calamity. Aperture was so slow, so unusable, so horribly inadequate that I immediately bought Lightroom and didn&#8217;t look back.<br />
How is it possible for Adobe to create an app that flies when Apple cannot???</p>
<p>Foolishly though I bought Aperture 3.3 on a whim from the App Store and I thought I&#8217;d give it another try.<br />
My opinion in one sentence:<br />
Apple is NOT, repeat ***NOT*** serious about this program in any way shape or form. </p>
<p>For Mark and the millions of shutterbugs out there it may suffice, particularly for the price, but as a professional tool it&#8217;s hopeless.<br />
If your camera pays your mortgage, feel free to critique my assessment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xrs</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/06/23/review-what-a-photographer-thinks-of-aperture-3-3/#comment-856388</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[xrs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=535392#comment-856388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Black Sabath did inspire the globe with its music but let&#039;s admit it : Iron Maiden IS the best British band ......!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Black Sabath did inspire the globe with its music but let&#8217;s admit it : Iron Maiden IS the best British band &#8230;&#8230;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen Newman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/06/23/review-what-a-photographer-thinks-of-aperture-3-3/#comment-855973</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Helen Newman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 08:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=535392#comment-855973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can you tell me if Aperture 3 is compatible with OSX 5.4 MAC COMPUTER?  Thank you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you tell me if Aperture 3 is compatible with OSX 5.4 MAC COMPUTER?  Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enzos</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/06/23/review-what-a-photographer-thinks-of-aperture-3-3/#comment-855925</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Enzos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 06:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=535392#comment-855925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shared libraries at last! This will make things easier to manage libraries across computers &amp;c.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shared libraries at last! This will make things easier to manage libraries across computers &amp;c.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NT</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/06/23/review-what-a-photographer-thinks-of-aperture-3-3/#comment-855875</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 02:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=535392#comment-855875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How does the &quot;flesh tone&quot; work with people who aren&#039;t pink?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does the &#8220;flesh tone&#8221; work with people who aren&#8217;t pink?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tommy iommi</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/06/23/review-what-a-photographer-thinks-of-aperture-3-3/#comment-855740</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tommy iommi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=535392#comment-855740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[guess I can ignore the rest of this review ... because everyone knows Black Sabbath is the best (and original) British heavy metal band]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>guess I can ignore the rest of this review &#8230; because everyone knows Black Sabbath is the best (and original) British heavy metal band</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
