5 Comments

Summary:

There is hoopla today over the hundreds of new names like “.baby” that could soon “.com” and “.org” as fixtures of the internet. Here’s a Q&A:

There is much hoopla today over the hundreds of new names like “.baby” that could soon join “.com” and “.org” as fixtures of the internet. Many people, including some who hope to get rich, are hyping this is as a land grab while companies and consumers are questioning why the names are for sale in the first place. Here’s a Q&A:

What are these new names and when will they arrive?

The suffix at the end of a website is called a “top level domain,” or TLD. Right now there are about a dozen top level names like “.com” or “.biz” plus other all the ones reserved for countries like “.ca” for Canada or “.jp” for Japan. Now, hundreds of more TLD’s like “.lol” and “.apple” are set to be live by early next year. The complete list of names and their would-be owners was posted for the first time today and can be found here.

Who will own the new names?

In some cases, familiar companies like Google and Amazon have applied to own the names. In most cases, it’s companies you haven’t heard that want to make money selling websites  (for instance, the owner of “.dogs” could sell names like “www.rover.dogs” and “www.lassie.dogs”).

So all these companies are now going to run the internet?

Not exactly. Running a top level domain registry is an expensive and complicated affair. While some big technology firms like Apple might be up to the task, most companies are not. They will instead decide to outsource that part of it to existing registries and focus instead on the business of selling websites.

How does a company get a TLD in the first place?

The applicants paid a non-refundable $185,000 application fee to request a name. If they can show that they have the qualifications to do the job, they will likely get it. They will then have to pay an annual fee of at least $25,000 to keep it.

What if more than one company wants the same name?

This is an issue. Today’s list reveals that 11 companies applied for “.app”, nine applied for “.art”, seven for “.news” and so on (see here for most popular names). When there are multiple applications for a name, the companies that meet the technical qualifications will have an auction to determine who gets to own it.

What happens now that the names have been announced?

There will be a sixty-day period for the public to comment. According to trademark lawyer Joanne Ludovici-Lint of McDermott Will & Emery, companies will then have seven months to bring formal objections to any of the proposed names. Disputes will be resolved by ICANN (see below) and the World Intellectual Property Office, which are the same bodies that resolve disputes over website ownership.

Why do we have all these new names in the first place?

This was ICANN’s idea. The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) is a non-profit agency located in Los Angeles that oversees internet names and addresses. Over the last decade, it added new TLDs such as “.jobs” and “.coop” and then decided to make the number of TLD’s essentially limitless.

Why is there a controversy over the new names?

Critics say it will lead to a new flood of cyber-squatting. Brand owners are already upset with ICANN for creating new TLD’s like “.pro” or “.travel” that they don’t want or need. In the case of last year’s “.xxx”, for instance, major companies across America called the scheme a “shakedown” and “extortion” because they felt forced to buy up the names before a squatter did. The arrival of hundreds or thousands of new names will exacerbate the problem. “Father of the internet” Vint Cerf has also expressed skepticism, recently telling a Dutch newspaper (translation):

“Hundreds of new brands and generic names to add now? I see no benefit in that. Many companies fear that they will soon must follow hundreds of new Internet extensions to ensure that their names never be abused. They have a point.”

So who does ICANN report to?

The body was once overseen by the U.S. Department of Commerce but in 2006 it signed an agreement that made it autonomous. It now professes allegiance to a “multi-staker model” but in reality appears to be accountable to no one at all. As this devastating article by a Wired editor recounts, former members of ICANN have engaged in a brazen act of self-dealing by creating the scheme to sell the names and then turning around and offering registry and consulting services (a trademark lawyers says today’s list shows that a company owned by the former ICANN chair has filed the third most applications). ICANN has also ignored requests by companies to create a “defensive registry” that allow them to protect their names and is planning to use half of the hundreds of millions of fees it is collecting to fund a legal war-chest.

(Image by Anna Omelchenko via Shutterstock)

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. Rich get richer, nothing more.

  2. would love to see an in-depth look at the fascinating company that is donuts.co!

  3. This is going to be one to follow as the development of it continues. As an SEO specialist this will effect the industry in several ways. I figure if it is successful the prices will begin to decrease for those less fortunate companies not able to afford these top layer domains.

  4. Web Wise Forum Thursday, June 14, 2012

    The batching process will definitely be an interesting experience. Legal organisations who help trademark owners protect their intellectual property online are about to have a field day.

    However it’s a great day for the progression of the Internet as we know it.

    No doubt it would have been nice to see more applicants from African and South American regions, there is a concern that the hefty $185,000 priced organisations in these regions out of the process. However Rod Beckstrom, the ICANN CEO and President highlighted the fact that economic support was available via an applicant support programme.

    “When there are multiple applications for a name, the companies that meet the technical qualifications will have an auction to determine who gets to own it.”

    While this is essentially correct, ICANN are really pushing the arbitration process. Applicants contesting the same strings are encouraged to work together to either delegate a shared operation arrangement or buy each other out. I think a lot of contested strings will actually end up being decided before auction kicks in, 60 days after the big reveal.

    I’m very excited though! Don’t know about everyone else but the prospect of owning myname.ninja brings giggles around our office.

Comments have been disabled for this post