7 Comments

Summary:

In a recent blog post, NASA’s CIO Linda Cureton gives both Microsoft Azure and Amazon Web Services a shout-out for helping NASA save money while serving its constituencies. But she made no mention of OpenStack, the cloud platform NASA helped bring to life.

3031088430_a679723a72_z

If folks were given to reading tea leaves, they might read a lot into a recent blog post by NASA CIO Linda Cureton in which she discussed IT reform at the U.S. space agency.

She mentioned a few specific cloud computing efforts, including a project at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory that uploaded 250,000 photos of Mars onto Windows Azure, Microsoft’s cloud computing platform as a service. The resulting Be A Martian initiative served up more than 2.5 million data queries, “proving that the cloud can be a terrific way to reach and engage the public,” she wrote.

She also said Amazon Web Services played a big role at NASA:

NASA shifted to a new web services model that uses Amazon Web Services for cloud-based enterprise infrastructure. This cloud-based model supports a wide variety of web applications and sites using an interoperable, standards-based, and secure environment while providing almost a million dollars in cost savings each year.

What she did not mention was anything about OpenStack, the infrastructure as a service platform that grew out of initial work by NASA and Rackspace. OpenStack is being pushed as an alternative to Amazon Web Services by several tech heavyweights including Hewlett-Packard, IBM, and Red Hat. This blog piqued my interest because, in late March, another NASA official said publicly that the agency is backing off additional OpenStack development.

At the time of that earlier report, a NASA spokesman elaborated via email:

If NASA’s cloud computing requirements can be met through commercially available services, then it is not necessary for NASA to continue in a development role in cloud computing. NASA continues to have significant interest in using the OpenStack platform, and takes pride in the contributions made to the furthering of that technology area. Further OpenStack development is desirable and would increase the interest of commercial providers which ultimately benefits NASA and other seekers of cloud services.

So NASA was stepping back from development work, which made sense, but it could still be using OpenStack. Now, however, Cureton’s blog  —  which Amazon evangelist Jeff Barr highlighted on the AWS site —  raises questions about whether NASA is changing technology partners.  The space agency, after all, is undergoing a change of mission itself. I pinged NASA and OpenStack for comment Monday and will update this with their response.

Feature photo courtesy of Flickr user jurvetson

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. Keith Townsend Tuesday, June 12, 2012

    Reblogged this on Virtualized Geek and commented:
    I don’t like where the perception of OpenStack is heading. HP is using it as part of their private cloud solution but did not marketing it at all in their recent announcements surrounding their cloud offerings.

    Now NASA seems to be backing off what was an high profile backing of the solution just under 2 years ago. Other than adding IBM, Oracle and Redhat to the roster of contributors OpenStack hasn’t had much positive momentum.

    I’m hoping for a win on the marketing front sooner than later. Hopefully, Rackspace has a big customer win up their sleeve. Sounds like OpenStack could use some positive press.

    1. I disagree somewhat, Keith. OpenStack is in a pretty good space considering what it is; its an automation and orchestration engine with the funky twist of cloud computing, which is automated self-service and authentication for users. It’s meant to be under the hood, and its a long, long way from being a standalone cloud solution. It’s in production and HP and Cisco as well as Rackspace and other providers; those two alone are enough to sustain it as an open source project, but it has lots of sponsorship $$ at this point. I don’t know if it needs big wins on its own merit any more than MySQL did, way back when, to be a success.

      1. Good points Carl. I can’t say I completely disagree with you. I just don’t like that HP has taken the project and not promoted it as a central part of their solution. Kind of like what Amazon did with Android. If you go to HP’s cloud site today you will find little to no reference to Openstack. I looked last week and couldn’t find a single reference. I think with the above article and the non-mention from HP, the perception is that OpenStack is not a platform for the enterprise.

        If you are willing to throw development resources at it then it’s a great 70% start to a platform as HP and Rackspace have demonstrated. But outside of Rackspace who is championing the OpenStack brand? I don’t believe it needs to be championed among service providers but for enterprises looking to align to a particular platform for hybrid clouds I believe it’s needed.

  2. Did you have no response from them yet?

    1. No response from either.

  3. Still no response?

    1. actually, thanks for reminding me. They never did get back to me but here is an update (kinda)
      http://gigaom.com/cloud/nasa-cio-we-still-use-openstack-and-amazon-and-microsoft-azure/

Comments have been disabled for this post