<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Mac hardware line adds Retina Display MacBook Pro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/06/11/new-mac-hardware-line-adds-retina-display-macbook-pro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/06/11/new-mac-hardware-line-adds-retina-display-macbook-pro/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 20:59:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bry</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/06/11/new-mac-hardware-line-adds-retina-display-macbook-pro/#comment-851257</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=530951#comment-851257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s actually difficult to understand an article that contains specific information (like hardware specs) while containing so many typos and poor structure. This is a high school newspaper-like quality in an article that indicates one must PAY for additional content?! Why would I pay for this? 

Really, folks, take a little time to proofread and edit before rushing an article onto the site. You don&#039;t have an exclusive, so there&#039;s really no rush.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s actually difficult to understand an article that contains specific information (like hardware specs) while containing so many typos and poor structure. This is a high school newspaper-like quality in an article that indicates one must PAY for additional content?! Why would I pay for this? </p>
<p>Really, folks, take a little time to proofread and edit before rushing an article onto the site. You don&#8217;t have an exclusive, so there&#8217;s really no rush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Sitver</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/06/11/new-mac-hardware-line-adds-retina-display-macbook-pro/#comment-850987</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Sitver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 05:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=530951#comment-850987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 15 inch macbook pro is definitely their flagship computer. It&#039;s certainly something else: http://bit.ly/macbookpro2012]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 15 inch macbook pro is definitely their flagship computer. It&#8217;s certainly something else: <a href="http://bit.ly/macbookpro2012" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/macbookpro2012</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luscious</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/06/11/new-mac-hardware-line-adds-retina-display-macbook-pro/#comment-850843</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luscious]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=530951#comment-850843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1920 x 1080 already looks good at 15.4 inches, so I don&#039;t see the benefit of such high DPI on a mid-size panel. I would have much preferred to see that 2880 x 1800 resolution on a larger 17&quot; digital canvas.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1920 x 1080 already looks good at 15.4 inches, so I don&#8217;t see the benefit of such high DPI on a mid-size panel. I would have much preferred to see that 2880 x 1800 resolution on a larger 17&#8243; digital canvas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
