11 Comments

Summary:

Many people would argue that Apple is the strongest company today. But if you applied the Apple valuation on Facebook’s revenue, Facebook would trade at $10 billion, not $57 billion (as of market close), down from more than $100 billion on its inaugural IPO date.

money_401K

Many people would argue that Apple is the strongest company today. The way it makes money, it almost resembles a bank. But if you applied the Apple valuation on Facebook’s revenue, Facebook would trade at about $12 billion, not $57 billion (as of market close June 6, 2012), down from more than $100 billion on its inaugural IPO date.

Also, if you look at other great companies, such as Oracle, Microsoft or SAP, and their valuations on revenue or on EBIT, those companies trade between $10 billion and $14 billion.

I’m basing this off of the barometer my team uses. Each quarter we introduce the MW IT Index. Our market-weighted-value index takes the market value of 120 companies grouped into four technology categories: IT services and business process outsourcing, IT supply chain services, software, and SaaS. The index assigned a value of 1,000 to each composite group on December 31, 2008, and it has tracked the category performance since then.

Bottom line is that SaaS companies are trading at a premium of 150 percent or more from the other segments according to our latest quarter.

Facebook initially traded at about a 300 percent premium above such SaaS companies as Salesforce.com.

Facebook was trading at 30 to 40 times revenue, compared to companies in the IT products and services space that are trading at four to 10 times EBITDA and SaaS companies that are trading at two to five times revenue. If Facebook’s financials were in the IT Services space, it would be valued between $4 billion to $6 billion, not $57 billion.

It just shows that the space you are in matters. SaaS, IT services, IT BPO and IT supply chain companies are valued quite differently than Facebook.

But people must remember that when they invest in Facebook, they are investing in a company with assumptions that are going to be very difficult to achieve over time. Assumptions that leave little margin for error are built into the price of the stock.

For example, in the ’90s, Cisco was going to be the first trillion-dollar company. But they didn’t make it. The reasons why do not matter — what does matter is that a very high bar was set.

So, the Facebook market expectation is set as high as they have ever been. In addition, Facebook’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, was quoted as saying in a recent article in New York Magazine, “We don’t build services to make money; we make money to build better services.”  Most companies must do the opposite — make money then build better services. This is bearing out in the market reaction.

Today, Facebook has almost $4 billion in revenue and a billion in earnings. That is a real company. But, the market expectation might not be real yet, and there is little, or no, operating margin of error for the company to make its mark.

Plus, when we look into the future at possible competitors for Facebook, we don’t know who they are. They are probably in college or in a garage. That is why Warren Buffet does not invest in technology companies. Today’s technology darling can be obsolete tomorrow.

If you want to look at out-of-sight valuations, look at the SaaS space. If you want to leave the galaxy, look at Facebook.

We will see if they can meet expectations five years from today. That is possible.

The news that GM pulled its advertising will have little bearing on Facebook’s valuation. By the way, I assume you saw that Warren Buffet recently bought 10 million shares of GM.

Marty Wolf is the founder and president of martinwolf, a leading middle market IT M&A specialist. Since 1997, he has guided buyers and sellers in the IT services, business process outsourcing, supply chain and software industries through more than one hundred transactions, including divestitures of Fortune 500 divisions. 

Image courtesy of Flickr user 401K.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. There is some revenue growth priced into the value of the stock, but it’s not value that can easily be unlocked. Though it should be easy to generate more than $3 per user per quarter and increase that so their revenues jump up.

  2. I am not sure I understand the point of this article. Facebook is a media company, not a tech company. The vast majority of the company’s revenue and earnings come from advertising and credits. As a consequence, it has a different growth and margin profile. Better comparables are LinkedIn, Yelp, and Google.

  3. Laughing_Boy48 Wednesday, June 6, 2012

    So, they claim that Apple will be a trillion-dollar company, too, but it doesn’t seem like it will make that mark either. Apple’s P/E is a lot lower than Cisco’s was and it looks to stay that way. Apple isn’t going to get a free pass.

    1. “Apple isn’t going to get a free pass.”

      Indeed but if Apple doubles their cash in the next year – which is certainly possible even given the dividend payouts upcoming – then they will get there by cash holdings alone. Apple’s market cap appears to follow it’s cash holdings closed than any other metric.

  4. I would like to point out that Warren Buffet has a multi billion dollar interest in IBM; not a small stake for a guy who does not invest in technology companies.

  5. Facebook is a media company and social site always care user needs and security, it’s the best thought of Facebook, as CEO of Facebook quoted “We don’t build services to make money; we make money to build better services.”

  6. @Ben the key point is valuations are discounted current value of future cash flows. This provides some reference points on how flawlessly Facebook will have to execute in the coming months and years and at what level. The expectations are high very high for the entire group Linkedin/Yelp included. Just how high when compared to a hot company like even apple or salesforce in a different space. My view is that yahoo was replaced by Google, google by facebook. Irrespective of how strong the team / technology is the market will move faster than the team can execute.

  7. From the perspective of number of users , if google is worth 600$ FB should be at least worth 60$

  8. 10 billion sounds about right…for a company that doesn’t make anything, and has no real business model to make more than it spends…
    http://scottsscripts.wordpress.com/2012/05/21/about-the-facebook-ipo/

  9. Sofia Fenichell Thursday, June 7, 2012

    I agree with Ben. What is the point of this article? And yes, FB is a media company. The issues are twofold: 1) the CEO controls the board and has made it very clear that revenue growth is not a priority – I don’t even think Jobs had this kind of power or this kind of irreverance for profitability, 2) the revenue model is still as yet not convincing both in terms of quality of advertising revenues and the ability of the company to deliver on advertising growth and 3) there seems to be more interest in buying growth which is even LESS proven (mobile advertising has 1/5th the CMP as desktop). Pls don’t misunderstand me, I think Facebook is one of the greatest assets of all time, I just think that the money to be made on it was yesterday’s money. Investors need to look elsewhere for growth until the language and strategy emanating from a PUBLIC company evolves.

  10. A topical article given recent events. FB’s market cap implies significant future growth in revenue, ebitda and monetization. Expect it to be under pressure to deliver on this whilst at the same time pressing for greater privacy concessions from its users.

Comments have been disabled for this post