Comments on: SCADA is dead, long live IP http://gigaom.com/2012/06/04/scada-is-dead-long-live-ip/ Thu, 23 May 2013 09:49:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Bill http://gigaom.com/2012/06/04/scada-is-dead-long-live-ip/#comment-851801 Wed, 13 Jun 2012 18:25:03 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=528583#comment-851801 It is quite obvious the writer dosen’t even know what SCADA is!!!

]]> By: C http://gigaom.com/2012/06/04/scada-is-dead-long-live-ip/#comment-851790 Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:42:43 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=528583#comment-851790 I build scada systems both wired and wireless and there’s really nothing you can say when someone writes a clueless article on a subject they clearly know nothing about.

]]> By: worthingtonsawtellellc http://gigaom.com/2012/06/04/scada-is-dead-long-live-ip/#comment-850909 Tue, 12 Jun 2012 01:14:32 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=528583#comment-850909 “Four nines” reliability is 99.99%.

]]> By: automationgear http://gigaom.com/2012/06/04/scada-is-dead-long-live-ip/#comment-849284 Thu, 07 Jun 2012 19:37:20 +0000 http://gigaom.com/?p=528583#comment-849284 Interesting that no one has commented about this from the SCADA community. I’m sure it’s just an SEO headline, but you are mixing two different concepts here. What is happening is that IP network communications is replacing proprietary radio (and landline) communications. I see it in many areas of technology I cover in the industrial/manufacturing space.

Gary Mintchell, Automation World and http://www.garymintchellsfeedforward.com

]]>