<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google moving to all paid Google Product Search listings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/05/31/google-moving-to-all-paid-google-product-search-listings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/31/google-moving-to-all-paid-google-product-search-listings/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 17:41:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FTC</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/31/google-moving-to-all-paid-google-product-search-listings/#comment-867121</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FTC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 08:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=527515#comment-867121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has moved to &quot;advertisers only&quot; as well for most commercial searches. Virtually everyone of them is an advertiser, something also reflected in the 42% ad-click growth.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has moved to &#8220;advertisers only&#8221; as well for most commercial searches. Virtually everyone of them is an advertiser, something also reflected in the 42% ad-click growth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hedonist666</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/31/google-moving-to-all-paid-google-product-search-listings/#comment-863888</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hedonist666]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 10:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=527515#comment-863888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think this is a terrible idea. Not only does it affect me personally as a small online retailer with a very low advertising budget, but it goes against the product search as being a search engine. How long before they roll out a new service where you have to pay to get in the first 10 pages or so of regular search results? It&#039;s stupid. I use google product search a lot myself when I&#039;m planning to buy something and the main advantage has always been that a lot of retailers are featured in it. Making it paid will most certainly reduce the number of products being displayed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a terrible idea. Not only does it affect me personally as a small online retailer with a very low advertising budget, but it goes against the product search as being a search engine. How long before they roll out a new service where you have to pay to get in the first 10 pages or so of regular search results? It&#8217;s stupid. I use google product search a lot myself when I&#8217;m planning to buy something and the main advantage has always been that a lot of retailers are featured in it. Making it paid will most certainly reduce the number of products being displayed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timtamtoboot</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/31/google-moving-to-all-paid-google-product-search-listings/#comment-852836</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[timtamtoboot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=527515#comment-852836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Might be worthwhile checking out sell anywhere links which allow adding products to a shopping cart directly out of Google&#039;s natural search results. Do a search for &#039;rough orange flakes&#039; to see an example. Or test a sell anywhere link such as http://iPod.santu.com to add a sample product right here to a checkout. Most people use the Google natural search anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might be worthwhile checking out sell anywhere links which allow adding products to a shopping cart directly out of Google&#8217;s natural search results. Do a search for &#8216;rough orange flakes&#8217; to see an example. Or test a sell anywhere link such as <a href="http://iPod.santu.com" rel="nofollow">http://iPod.santu.com</a> to add a sample product right here to a checkout. Most people use the Google natural search anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ano nym</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/31/google-moving-to-all-paid-google-product-search-listings/#comment-851997</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ano nym]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 04:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=527515#comment-851997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shameful! We are a small online business, trying every day to get ORGANIC search results with Google with hard work. All the fairness out the window Google? Thank you! Only the money counts!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shameful! We are a small online business, trying every day to get ORGANIC search results with Google with hard work. All the fairness out the window Google? Thank you! Only the money counts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Ji</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/31/google-moving-to-all-paid-google-product-search-listings/#comment-851446</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jerry Ji]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=527515#comment-851446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For everyone who is looking for a truly open, social, and real-time channel to search products or promote products, take a look at this startup http://bizspeaking.com/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For everyone who is looking for a truly open, social, and real-time channel to search products or promote products, take a look at this startup <a href="http://bizspeaking.com/" rel="nofollow">http://bizspeaking.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: denschaal</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/31/google-moving-to-all-paid-google-product-search-listings/#comment-846930</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[denschaal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 15:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=527515#comment-846930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google may list ads as sponsored, but it is doing so in a very misleading way in Google Hotel Finder. As I wrote http://www.tnooz.com/2012/06/01/news/google-hotel-finder-ota-advertisers-commandeer-hotel-pages/ Google is labeling hotel listings as &quot;Ads,&quot; but the only practical booking links in bold red letters largely are from online travel agencies. Very misleading because at first glance these look like they are ads from the hotels. The hotel industry hasn&#039;t yet woken up to this latest Google experiment, but I think the hotel industry will be very angry, to say the least. Google also isn&#039;t very transparent about the total cost of booking the room. So much for transparency.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google may list ads as sponsored, but it is doing so in a very misleading way in Google Hotel Finder. As I wrote <a href="http://www.tnooz.com/2012/06/01/news/google-hotel-finder-ota-advertisers-commandeer-hotel-pages/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tnooz.com/2012/06/01/news/google-hotel-finder-ota-advertisers-commandeer-hotel-pages/</a> Google is labeling hotel listings as &#8220;Ads,&#8221; but the only practical booking links in bold red letters largely are from online travel agencies. Very misleading because at first glance these look like they are ads from the hotels. The hotel industry hasn&#8217;t yet woken up to this latest Google experiment, but I think the hotel industry will be very angry, to say the least. Google also isn&#8217;t very transparent about the total cost of booking the room. So much for transparency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FPSWin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/31/google-moving-to-all-paid-google-product-search-listings/#comment-846801</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FPSWin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 06:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=527515#comment-846801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google will be making huge revenue due to this drastic change and retailers will have to pay millions to fill in the sales gaps.  There are also upside to it, as many retailers would list free products, making search results messy.  Now that they will have to pay, the search results would be more refined.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google will be making huge revenue due to this drastic change and retailers will have to pay millions to fill in the sales gaps.  There are also upside to it, as many retailers would list free products, making search results messy.  Now that they will have to pay, the search results would be more refined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Speranza</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/31/google-moving-to-all-paid-google-product-search-listings/#comment-846478</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Speranza]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=527515#comment-846478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the question is ... will they use a freemium business model which they do quite successfully with other services. Giving something for free, just to charge for the same service later just alienates customers. But then again, changes to the privacy rules have the same effect.
I suppose Google got to the point where it needs to choose who it wants to alienate: its customers or its shareholders.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the question is &#8230; will they use a freemium business model which they do quite successfully with other services. Giving something for free, just to charge for the same service later just alienates customers. But then again, changes to the privacy rules have the same effect.<br />
I suppose Google got to the point where it needs to choose who it wants to alienate: its customers or its shareholders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: threetwelvedavid</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/31/google-moving-to-all-paid-google-product-search-listings/#comment-846166</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[threetwelvedavid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 03:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=527515#comment-846166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s see, where have I been hearing so much lately about how paid links are spammy and low-quality? Hmmm.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see, where have I been hearing so much lately about how paid links are spammy and low-quality? Hmmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: threetwelvedavid</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/31/google-moving-to-all-paid-google-product-search-listings/#comment-846164</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[threetwelvedavid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 03:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=527515#comment-846164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now let&#039;s see, where have we heard that paid links are low-quality? Hmmm...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now let&#8217;s see, where have we heard that paid links are low-quality? Hmmm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
