8 Comments

Summary:

LG has created a 5-inch screen with 1920 by 1080 resolution. There’s a tradeoff between screen resolution and smartphone size, but the trend is more pixels per inch and larger devices. And it’s all because on a smartphone, the screen is the most used component.

img-HTCOneX-Movies

LG announced its latest mobile display earlier this week: A 5-inch, full HD screen with 1920 x 1080 resolution. The new display will be shown off at next week’s SID 2012 Display Week in Boston and expected to be available in devices during the second half of this year. As our mobile video addiction grows, it seems that smartphone screens, as well as their capabilities, are growing in tandem.

Apple may have kicked off the high-resolution mainstream mobile screen phenomenon with its Retina Display, first found on the iPhone 4, but other handset makers have pushed beyond in both size and resolution. Apple’s 3.5-inch screen boasts a whopping 326 pixels per inch (PPI) and LG has far outdone that with its new 5-inch screen: full HD resolution in a 5-inch diagonal display measures an eye-popping 440 PPI. For comparison, my very first PDA in 2000 — a Compaq Aero — had a 4-inch display with 320 x 240 resolution, which works out to laughable 100 pixels per inch. Yes, you could easily see each individual pixel!

LG is touting new display technology for its 5-inch HD screen: The company is using AH-IPS (Advanced High Performance In-Plane Switching) to allow for wide viewing angles and increased light transmission. That should help offset some of the additional power requirements needed for use on a smartphone as it won’t need as much power to backlight the large display.

Of course, in mobile technology there are always trade-offs and the one I see here is between full high-definition resolution and the size of the screen, which directly influences the size of a smartphone. Some have said that Android phones are growing in size because they need room for LTE radios, but I believe that’s a secondary reason, if it’s even valid at all. Instead, as I’ve been suggesting for two years: Consumers are eating up more mobile video and immersive applications that are better experienced with larger, higher-resolution screens. In some regions, online video consumption on mobiles is higher than on fixed broadband.

It’s for this reason that I believe Apple will finally boost the iPhone from a 3.5-inch to a 4-inch display; not primarily to fit more sensors and technology into the device — although it would have more options to add them, or a larger battery, thanks to extra space — but to improve the content consumption experience. Look at it this way — no pun intended — what part of the smartphone do you most use on a daily basis? Sure, you use the camera, Wi-Fi radio, speaker and more, but everything in the smartphone is tied to the screen: It’s both the method of input and output and I’d be shocked if anyone said they use something else on their smartphone more than the display.

For that reason, in conjunction with an uptick in mobile video playback, it simply makes sense that LG and others are pushing the limits of our smartphone displays. When I first heard of the new 1920 x 1080 screen, I immediately thought that was overkill. Then I started to watch an HD video on my 1280 x 720 Galaxy Nexus screen and thought: I want more!

  1. But, I can’t hold that monster.

    Share
  2. That’s just greedy. How could you look at a beautiful hidef screen and want more. I’m rocking gs2 skyrocket and I’m cool with it.

    Share
  3. You do realize that a display with higher than ~300 dpi is not distinguishable by the human eye? Unless you have deer eyes, a 440 ppi screen is pointless.

    Share
    1. Redwan, you’re half right. ;) A display with higher ~300 dpi does mean the pixels are not distinguishable by the human eye….. when held at 10-inches or more from the eye. The bigger the screen, the farther away people tend to be from it. Example: I hold my iPhone 4S far closer to my eyes than I do my Galaxy Nexus. 440 ppi may sound like too much, yes, but it wasn’t too long ago that > 300 on a mobile device sounded like it too. Regardless, you could be right…. the market will eventually decide.

      Share
    2. 440 ppi it is! Pointless maybe but I’m definitely not complaining!

      Share
  4. I don’t view media on my phone basically ever. I know I’m the odd-one-out, but I just don’t see the need. I’m almost always within proximity of a computer…

    Share
  5. You’ve got to wonder what the tradeoff in power consumption is for this display. Honestly I’m a little freaked out that the new iPad retina display DOUBLED the power consumption of the backlight (more crap in the way, lower emissivity) and thus required a doubling of the battery. Ugh. I’m all for higher resolution and all, but when its something you might not notice and it makes cell phones that are already teetering on the edge of having too little battery life run into real problems I have to wonder if they’ve gone too far.

    Seriously, this seems similar to the current “quad core” trend which seems to exist for no reason other than specsmanship. How about a phone that lasts all day?

    Share
  6. At 2.3gb per hour this should blow away everyone’s data cap and make the cell providers a fortune. Cool.

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post