<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why would Amazon become a virtual operator? It already is one</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/05/29/why-would-amazon-become-an-mvno-it-already-is-a-virtual-operator/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/29/why-would-amazon-become-an-mvno-it-already-is-a-virtual-operator/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:58:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Meyer</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/29/why-would-amazon-become-an-mvno-it-already-is-a-virtual-operator/#comment-845420</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Meyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 18:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=526597#comment-845420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would be extremely prude for Amazon to actually look at how long it took Tracfone to first get &#039;rep&#039;, and be trusted as an MVNO (as you hold the examples to be). but..
Hypothetically: Amazon would want to team up with Tracfone, to appease Slim into entering an arrangement with all of America Movil&#039;s communications subsidiaries. MVNO&#039;ing off an MVNO, as you suggested might very well appease a lot of channels, AT&amp;T included (as AT&amp;T have major shares in AMX).
Amazon + mobile convenience = revenue +++
Would love to see it happen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be extremely prude for Amazon to actually look at how long it took Tracfone to first get &#8216;rep&#8217;, and be trusted as an MVNO (as you hold the examples to be). but..<br />
Hypothetically: Amazon would want to team up with Tracfone, to appease Slim into entering an arrangement with all of America Movil&#8217;s communications subsidiaries. MVNO&#8217;ing off an MVNO, as you suggested might very well appease a lot of channels, AT&amp;T included (as AT&amp;T have major shares in AMX).<br />
Amazon + mobile convenience = revenue +++<br />
Would love to see it happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mari Silbey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/29/why-would-amazon-become-an-mvno-it-already-is-a-virtual-operator/#comment-845398</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mari Silbey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 17:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=526597#comment-845398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amazon isn&#039;t only a virtual mobile operator (albeit a &quot;lite&quot; one), it&#039;s an Internet operator in a much broader sense. It&#039;s the fourth largest content delivery network provider, and already 1% of Internet traffic goes through Amazon servers. Content and connectivity are mixing. And Amazon is one of the very big players out there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazon isn&#8217;t only a virtual mobile operator (albeit a &#8220;lite&#8221; one), it&#8217;s an Internet operator in a much broader sense. It&#8217;s the fourth largest content delivery network provider, and already 1% of Internet traffic goes through Amazon servers. Content and connectivity are mixing. And Amazon is one of the very big players out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
