<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The growing epidemic of page bloat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/05/23/the-growing-epidemic-of-page-bloat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/23/the-growing-epidemic-of-page-bloat/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 06:11:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/23/the-growing-epidemic-of-page-bloat/#comment-873986</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 00:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=523408#comment-873986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So when you work out what the average page size is, you only count sites that are optimized for mobile? Makes perfect sense, but in reality the websites that are &quot;worth its salt&quot; right now are the exception to the rule.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So when you work out what the average page size is, you only count sites that are optimized for mobile? Makes perfect sense, but in reality the websites that are &#8220;worth its salt&#8221; right now are the exception to the rule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ezekiel Templin</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/23/the-growing-epidemic-of-page-bloat/#comment-846028</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ezekiel Templin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 22:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=523408#comment-846028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ilya Grigorik, a Googler and all-around smart dude, gave a great talk at RailsConf last month about this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUSucUxb40s]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ilya Grigorik, a Googler and all-around smart dude, gave a great talk at RailsConf last month about this: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUSucUxb40s" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUSucUxb40s</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swalsh3733</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/23/the-growing-epidemic-of-page-bloat/#comment-845797</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[swalsh3733]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 13:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=523408#comment-845797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Umm, any website worth its salt has a mobile optimized page that is usually leaner than their normal page.  Has the author ever surfed the web with a mobile phone?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm, any website worth its salt has a mobile optimized page that is usually leaner than their normal page.  Has the author ever surfed the web with a mobile phone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Gibbard</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/23/the-growing-epidemic-of-page-bloat/#comment-844033</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Gibbard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 16:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=523408#comment-844033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was thinking exactly the same thing. It&#039;s a short-sighted argument otherwise. The &#039;page load times&#039; data is pretty inconclusive too. What about the effect of the number of http requests rather than file size? Badly coded pages and poor infrastructure will mean it takes ages to load pages in some cases even when file size is modest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking exactly the same thing. It&#8217;s a short-sighted argument otherwise. The &#8216;page load times&#8217; data is pretty inconclusive too. What about the effect of the number of http requests rather than file size? Badly coded pages and poor infrastructure will mean it takes ages to load pages in some cases even when file size is modest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lankydane</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/23/the-growing-epidemic-of-page-bloat/#comment-843824</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lankydane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 22:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=523408#comment-843824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[that number should be compared to internet connection speed]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that number should be compared to internet connection speed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mobile Phones Fan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/23/the-growing-epidemic-of-page-bloat/#comment-843709</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mobile Phones Fan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 16:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=523408#comment-843709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, please -- spyware? And &#039;Google spyware&#039;? Surely it&#039;s time for the nurse to bring round your lovely NHS meds? ;-)

The overwhelming majority of bits or bytes spent on scripting are (a) put there -- however naively or unknowingly -- by the site owner, himself, and (b) put there with the express purpose of facilitating relatively benign background tasks: the big three of which are advertising, active content service [ie: CMS] or the many flavors of SEO, including site-navigation.

Yet  all of that pales in comparison with the threat now posed by maybe half the blogs I visit: loading the site&#039;s mainpage brings you the contents of dozens or even hundreds of posts, all at once...many if not all with embedded images or flash video players. It&#039;s bad enough to trigger such a digital landslide from a desktop, but on a mobile it&#039;s nightmarish.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, please &#8212; spyware? And &#8216;Google spyware&#8217;? Surely it&#8217;s time for the nurse to bring round your lovely NHS meds? ;-)</p>
<p>The overwhelming majority of bits or bytes spent on scripting are (a) put there &#8212; however naively or unknowingly &#8212; by the site owner, himself, and (b) put there with the express purpose of facilitating relatively benign background tasks: the big three of which are advertising, active content service [ie: CMS] or the many flavors of SEO, including site-navigation.</p>
<p>Yet  all of that pales in comparison with the threat now posed by maybe half the blogs I visit: loading the site&#8217;s mainpage brings you the contents of dozens or even hundreds of posts, all at once&#8230;many if not all with embedded images or flash video players. It&#8217;s bad enough to trigger such a digital landslide from a desktop, but on a mobile it&#8217;s nightmarish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey Higginbotham</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/23/the-growing-epidemic-of-page-bloat/#comment-843654</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacey Higginbotham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=523408#comment-843654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The irony of running this article on our particularly overladen pages is not lost on us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The irony of running this article on our particularly overladen pages is not lost on us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Divergent Trend</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/23/the-growing-epidemic-of-page-bloat/#comment-843646</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Divergent Trend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=523408#comment-843646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1220 lines and 93 scripts to deliver the 680 words worth of content and 4 comments I&#039;m interested in on this page.

Yep, it&#039;s out of control.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1220 lines and 93 scripts to deliver the 680 words worth of content and 4 comments I&#8217;m interested in on this page.</p>
<p>Yep, it&#8217;s out of control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hardpeaches</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/23/the-growing-epidemic-of-page-bloat/#comment-843626</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hardpeaches]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 12:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=523408#comment-843626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The popularity of CMS&#039; such as Wordpress most certainly add to the issue of large page sizes. 

Obviously, those tools are not inherently bad, but the ability to easily add all sorts of rich media combined with a ton of extra scripts leads to some morbidly obese pages.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The popularity of CMS&#8217; such as WordPress most certainly add to the issue of large page sizes. </p>
<p>Obviously, those tools are not inherently bad, but the ability to easily add all sorts of rich media combined with a ton of extra scripts leads to some morbidly obese pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Canon</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/23/the-growing-epidemic-of-page-bloat/#comment-843622</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Canon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 12:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=523408#comment-843622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m going to have to call out Mashable on this.. it takes so long to load one of its pages and then it almost feels like it slows my entire browser down if I have one of their pages open in a tab but not in others.. WTF?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to have to call out Mashable on this.. it takes so long to load one of its pages and then it almost feels like it slows my entire browser down if I have one of their pages open in a tab but not in others.. WTF?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
