2 Comments

Summary:

China is expected to rule soon on Google’s proposed acquisition of Motorola, with the deal already approved elsewhere. Google needs the deal, especially for tablets, says Goldman Sachs, because the costs are too high to be the default search engine on Apple’s iPad.

XOOM2_mediaedition_Front_horiz_Movie

China is expected to rule soon on Google’s proposed acquisition of Motorola, with the deal already approved in the U.S. and Europe. When Google announced its intention to spend $12.5 billion on Motorola — one of its own Android hardware partners — the purchase was considered to be a play for Motorola’s mobile patents. There’s additional opportunity as well, in the form of Google’s having direct control over Android hardware. One research firm suggests this aspect is key for Google to have any success in the tablet market while also improving its revenue stream on mobile search.

Goldman Sachs published a detailed research note on Thursday suggesting how critical the Motorola deal is for Google to battle both Apple’s iPad as well as Amazon’s Kindle Fire tablet, which is actually built on the Android platform. Google gains no benefit from the Fire, however, as Amazon has created its own browser and curates an app store specific to the device. And although Google is the default search engine on the top-selling iPad, it actually pays Apple for that privilege, which offsets Google’s revenue from ads on Apple’s tablet.

The research report explains it this way:

On a tactical level, while we estimate mobile queries account for just 20% of searches, we believe they are growing 4-5x as quickly as desktop queries. Thus, MMI’s patents would be important for protecting Android and improving mobile economics, as we estimate Google pays Apple roughly 75% revenue share to be the default in the Safari search bar, which we estimate accounts for roughly one-third of all mobile queries.

The issue then is fairly simple to understand: Although mobile search volume is up, Goldman Sachs thinks it is costing Google too much — more than on the desktop — to acquire mobile search and ad revenues. In order to reduce this expense and boost net revenues in mobile, Google has to get consumers to buy more Android tablets.

The Motorola buy can surely help this: I explained why in a GigaOM Pro report (subscription required) last month and took it one step further recently. Aside from Google using Motorola to develop tablets, it could even take advantage of Motorola’s LapDock hardware, which uses an Android handset to power a notebooklike shell. Instead of a proprietary Motorola software environment, Google could use Android or even the Chrome OS for such a device.

However, some of these arguments could be moot points now. Or they could be part of a larger strategy. Earlier this week, the Wall Street Journal reported Google is considering working with several hardware partners on Nexus phones and tablets. That would help ease the mind of Samsung, HTC, LG and other Android partners that might be concerned over the Motorola purchase by Google. In either case, these types of strategies are ideas I had hoped for when I adamantly suggested Google find a way to take more control over Android.

You’re subscribed! If you like, you can update your settings

  1. Could be to little to late. People have phones which behave differently than the “new” tablets. Even with Google aps from Docs to voice search(even in 3.2 to 4.2) to browser (nobody in their right mind will not run chrome on ICS), to where the heck are the controls in this mail app now to what is that ugly icon suppose to do? It’s not a unified experience like on some other systems.
    One of the site effects of VZW shared data plan might be that we will get more interchangeable device usage, I don’t believe Google is ready for that.

  2. This has always been about Google hedging their bets, while improving their IP portfolio; multiple birds with one (pricey) stone. Manufacturers have been taking the same stance with WP7 and in-house mobile OS ventures. It would be foolish for either side not to hedge their bets.

    Branching out with the Nexus program is an obvious means to bolster the confidence of 3rd party manufacturing partners in order to take better advantage of Mobility manufacturing assets and strengthen Google’s control over Android devices; again, multiple birds with one stone and all of it can be dubbed as an effort to provide more freedom and a better experience for the customer (which is yet another bird nailed by the same stone).

    This is all part of the plan.

Comments have been disabled for this post