<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Level 3 concurs: Comcast appears to be prioritizing traffic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/05/17/level-3-concurs-comcast-appears-to-be-prioritizing-traffic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/17/level-3-concurs-comcast-appears-to-be-prioritizing-traffic/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:06:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/17/level-3-concurs-comcast-appears-to-be-prioritizing-traffic/#comment-842069</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 03:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=522847#comment-842069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The real question to me is whether or not they added reserved bandwidth on top (or in a dedicated segmented &#039;channel&#039;) of your Internet connection or within your allocated Internet bandwidth. If within, they are in trouble, if on-top, then I don&#039;t see the issue. No different than them running telco channels or video channels on the same cable.

My gut tells me that they can&#039;t effectively add (in a pure fashion) on top of your existing Internet connection with 100% segmentation. Instead, they found a clever way to do the effectively the same, but still effects some of the traffic during peak loads.

What they really need to do is modify the cable modems so they can handle multiple streams (&#039;channels&#039;), one for general Internet use, and various additional ones that they want to prioritize but are dedicated for the purpose. I personally don&#039;t see the issue if they do it that way. The just need to fully segment stuff -- just the same as having video on your cable doesn&#039;t effect your Internet, neither should have Xfinity on your XBOX.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real question to me is whether or not they added reserved bandwidth on top (or in a dedicated segmented &#8216;channel&#8217;) of your Internet connection or within your allocated Internet bandwidth. If within, they are in trouble, if on-top, then I don&#8217;t see the issue. No different than them running telco channels or video channels on the same cable.</p>
<p>My gut tells me that they can&#8217;t effectively add (in a pure fashion) on top of your existing Internet connection with 100% segmentation. Instead, they found a clever way to do the effectively the same, but still effects some of the traffic during peak loads.</p>
<p>What they really need to do is modify the cable modems so they can handle multiple streams (&#8216;channels&#8217;), one for general Internet use, and various additional ones that they want to prioritize but are dedicated for the purpose. I personally don&#8217;t see the issue if they do it that way. The just need to fully segment stuff &#8212; just the same as having video on your cable doesn&#8217;t effect your Internet, neither should have Xfinity on your XBOX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/17/level-3-concurs-comcast-appears-to-be-prioritizing-traffic/#comment-842025</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nathan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 23:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=522847#comment-842025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comcast sure has been throwing out a lot of chaff to deflect attention from this lately. Thinking they are in crisis mode now...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comcast sure has been throwing out a lot of chaff to deflect attention from this lately. Thinking they are in crisis mode now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
