<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google could be inviting more friends to Nexus party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/05/15/google-could-be-inviting-more-friends-to-nexus-party/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/15/google-could-be-inviting-more-friends-to-nexus-party/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 03:07:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/15/google-could-be-inviting-more-friends-to-nexus-party/#comment-841491</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 02:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=521895#comment-841491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a great development for potentially reducing Android fragmentation, since it can drive handset manufacturers to common display resolutions and keep users on the latest version of Android.

I&#039;d buy a locked Nexus model if it were free of crapware and UI overlays, included leading hardware and was updated directly by Google - these are the most valuable attributes of the Nexus name (for me, at least).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great development for potentially reducing Android fragmentation, since it can drive handset manufacturers to common display resolutions and keep users on the latest version of Android.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d buy a locked Nexus model if it were free of crapware and UI overlays, included leading hardware and was updated directly by Google &#8211; these are the most valuable attributes of the Nexus name (for me, at least).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A S</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/15/google-could-be-inviting-more-friends-to-nexus-party/#comment-841473</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A S]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 00:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=521895#comment-841473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If this happened, it would be great. But, I am somewhat pessimistic based on Google&#039;s history. In almost every instance when Google announced an initiative that depended on other partners (hardware makers, carriers, media industry, etc.), it never came to full fruition. At least not without a prolonged delay. Some announcements have never come to fruition. I am talking of official announcements here. The kind of announcements that would be made AFTER confirmed negotiations with such partners.

In this case, this is not even official. Just a rumor for now...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this happened, it would be great. But, I am somewhat pessimistic based on Google&#8217;s history. In almost every instance when Google announced an initiative that depended on other partners (hardware makers, carriers, media industry, etc.), it never came to full fruition. At least not without a prolonged delay. Some announcements have never come to fruition. I am talking of official announcements here. The kind of announcements that would be made AFTER confirmed negotiations with such partners.</p>
<p>In this case, this is not even official. Just a rumor for now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
