<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oh, no: not another wireless-charging group!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/05/07/oh-no-not-another-wireless-charging-group/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/07/oh-no-not-another-wireless-charging-group/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 07:25:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Featherlight</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/07/oh-no-not-another-wireless-charging-group/#comment-862399</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Featherlight]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 05:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=518630#comment-862399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A $2 problem tell that to the cartels or to the duggers. The charging pad can recharge multiple phones quickly. Also a new government mandate prohibits disabling a certain mini battery operated system for fear of safety, however that component fails time
 after time after time and again. This said component does not allow for just replacing the mini battery instead the manufacturers sell the part for $100 a piece. The part is not capable of surviving severe elements including extremely hot cold or wet. The automotive consumers need something that works is reliable and durable. Again key is there is a government mandate to never disable and consumers go broke. So I&#039;d pay $100 for the solution that will eliminate a $400 expense twice or maybe 3 times in a year. The use of cable is not an option due to it being susceptible to failures by the severe natural element. The answer my friends is Wireless power.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A $2 problem tell that to the cartels or to the duggers. The charging pad can recharge multiple phones quickly. Also a new government mandate prohibits disabling a certain mini battery operated system for fear of safety, however that component fails time<br />
 after time after time and again. This said component does not allow for just replacing the mini battery instead the manufacturers sell the part for $100 a piece. The part is not capable of surviving severe elements including extremely hot cold or wet. The automotive consumers need something that works is reliable and durable. Again key is there is a government mandate to never disable and consumers go broke. So I&#8217;d pay $100 for the solution that will eliminate a $400 expense twice or maybe 3 times in a year. The use of cable is not an option due to it being susceptible to failures by the severe natural element. The answer my friends is Wireless power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/07/oh-no-not-another-wireless-charging-group/#comment-839630</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 11:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=518630#comment-839630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sorry bro but I&#039;m still using a palm touchstone and it&#039;s a pretty fast charger compared to anything my family members use.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry bro but I&#8217;m still using a palm touchstone and it&#8217;s a pretty fast charger compared to anything my family members use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wireless DUde</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/07/oh-no-not-another-wireless-charging-group/#comment-839535</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wireless DUde]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 04:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=518630#comment-839535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[QCOM is doing MR coupling.  They bought a startup in the space and have been demoing the tech for years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QCOM is doing MR coupling.  They bought a startup in the space and have been demoing the tech for years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fanfoot</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/07/oh-no-not-another-wireless-charging-group/#comment-839531</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fanfoot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 04:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=518630#comment-839531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And again, if they can&#039;t get devices (multiple devices in my possession) to adopt this techology, across vendors, I&#039;ll stick to my $2 cables thanks.  So probably not worth bothering with any of this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And again, if they can&#8217;t get devices (multiple devices in my possession) to adopt this techology, across vendors, I&#8217;ll stick to my $2 cables thanks.  So probably not worth bothering with any of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/07/oh-no-not-another-wireless-charging-group/#comment-839450</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Om Malik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 21:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=518630#comment-839450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lol. best comment of the day!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol. best comment of the day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Hartman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/07/oh-no-not-another-wireless-charging-group/#comment-839449</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Albert Hartman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 21:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=518630#comment-839449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wireless charging: a $100 solution to a $2 problem.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wireless charging: a $100 solution to a $2 problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madlyb</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/07/oh-no-not-another-wireless-charging-group/#comment-839417</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Madlyb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 19:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=518630#comment-839417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a solution looking for a problem that aligns to it high adoption cost.  

First and foremost, the wireless component consumes space that could be allocated to battery capacity.

Second, you have to purchase infrastructure for every place you would like to charge from and those aren&#039;t very portable.

So, at the end of the day, my investment is pretty large and the only thing it saved was from hooking up the cable.

I&#039;ll pass.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a solution looking for a problem that aligns to it high adoption cost.  </p>
<p>First and foremost, the wireless component consumes space that could be allocated to battery capacity.</p>
<p>Second, you have to purchase infrastructure for every place you would like to charge from and those aren&#8217;t very portable.</p>
<p>So, at the end of the day, my investment is pretty large and the only thing it saved was from hooking up the cable.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll pass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jp Checa</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/07/oh-no-not-another-wireless-charging-group/#comment-839416</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jp Checa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 19:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=518630#comment-839416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It could be that A4WP is looking into magnetic resonance coupling to power devices.  That technology has been tested with a range of six feet.  Both Powermat and Qualcomm currently use inductive coupling which requires a charging surface, so adding MRC to their platforms adds &quot;spatial freedom&quot;.  WPC, with their Qi standard, announced back in April that they were adding MRC transmitters to their inductive charging platform.  So, it&#039;s likely A4WP is looking to do the same.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could be that A4WP is looking into magnetic resonance coupling to power devices.  That technology has been tested with a range of six feet.  Both Powermat and Qualcomm currently use inductive coupling which requires a charging surface, so adding MRC to their platforms adds &#8220;spatial freedom&#8221;.  WPC, with their Qi standard, announced back in April that they were adding MRC transmitters to their inductive charging platform.  So, it&#8217;s likely A4WP is looking to do the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
