<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Wi-Fi standard means better vehicle support, improved cell handoff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/05/07/new-wi-fi-standard-means-better-vehicle-support-improved-cell-handoff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/07/new-wi-fi-standard-means-better-vehicle-support-improved-cell-handoff/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:32:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/07/new-wi-fi-standard-means-better-vehicle-support-improved-cell-handoff/#comment-839651</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 13:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=518486#comment-839651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s a great point, Eddie. But truth be told, I&#039;m not sure that adding Wi-Fi calling to the core of Android adds any value for Google; i.e.: will it get them any more usable data for ads? I realize not everything about Android directly gives Google information, so I could be off-base here, but that&#039;s a though off the top of my head.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a great point, Eddie. But truth be told, I&#8217;m not sure that adding Wi-Fi calling to the core of Android adds any value for Google; i.e.: will it get them any more usable data for ads? I realize not everything about Android directly gives Google information, so I could be off-base here, but that&#8217;s a though off the top of my head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/05/07/new-wi-fi-standard-means-better-vehicle-support-improved-cell-handoff/#comment-839565</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eddie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 07:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=518486#comment-839565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevin, I would like to think that carriers are indeed wanting to hand off cellular traffic more so to Wi-Fi. If so, then does Google with Android (for example) not implement T-Mobile&#039;s Wi-Fi calling in the kernel to make it standard? They did so with the first Nexus phone but Nexus S didn&#039;t have it. Something&#039;s missing and I can&#039;t figure it out (seems fuzzy).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin, I would like to think that carriers are indeed wanting to hand off cellular traffic more so to Wi-Fi. If so, then does Google with Android (for example) not implement T-Mobile&#8217;s Wi-Fi calling in the kernel to make it standard? They did so with the first Nexus phone but Nexus S didn&#8217;t have it. Something&#8217;s missing and I can&#8217;t figure it out (seems fuzzy).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
