3 Comments

Summary:

Belying several earlier research studies, which said growth of U.S. multi-channel subscriptions has slowed significantly but not stopped, Nielsen’s latest “Cross-Platform Report” says the number of U.S. homes paying a multi-channel provider for TV services last year actually declined by 1.5 million, or about 1.5 percent.

Cord cutting / cutting the cord
photo: Shutterstock / artenot

One thing seems certain: the number of U.S. homes subscribing to a cable, satellite or telephone company for a multichannel TV bundle isn’t growing as fast as it used to.

In fact, belying several earlier research studies, which said growth of U.S. multi-channel services has slowed significantly but not stopped, Nielsen’s latest “Cross-Platform Report” says the number of U.S. homes paying a multichannel provider for TV services last year actually declined by 1.5 million, or about 1.5 percent.

Subscription gains made by telco providers AT&T and Verizon (about 1.1 million) and satellite service companies DirecTV and Dish (added 280,000 subscribers) could not offset the over 2.9 million subscriptions lost by cable providers, Nielsen reports (see chart).

Other nuggets from Nielsen’s quarterly “Cross-Platform” report:

– After years of growth, the average amount of time per month the typical viewer spent watching traditional TV in the fourth quarter declined by about 46 minutes, or one half of one percent. Nielsen says most of that shift is caused by DVR usage, which was up 12.3 percent year over year, but viewing of internet video (up 4.2 per) is also beginning to factor in.

– Amount of time spent on game consoles in the U.S. was up 30 percent year over year in the fourth quarter. These consoles can now be found in 45 percent of American homes, Nielsen says.

– Among kids 2-11, time-shifted viewing grew about 20 percent over the fourth quarter of 2010, with young audiences embracing DVR usage and on-demand viewing on game consoles.

  1. Wow I wonder how much more productive and how much better the economy would be if we got off our asses and went out and did things instead of being mindless zombies in front of TV.

    Share
  2. I expect this number to level it. Today there are two types of cord cutter: Economic and Techno. To the mainstream watching cable is just easier. We need some service provider breakthrough to take it mainstream. And with the battle over content that just hasn’t been possible – yet.
    http://cordcutterguide.com/

    Share
  3. Joel Witherspoon Saturday, July 21, 2012

    I am a cable cutter since 2009. I added 4 HD tuners to my family pc and distribute content through house with Xbox and media pc. I went from $180 a month satellite bill to 8.99 a month Netflix. I also cut the 45 dollar month phone bill for 60 dollar year Skype. I had to do all of this after a layoff in 2009 and even though I might drive my family nuts I cannot convince myself to going back to 220 a month for cable services. I welcome all new packet distribution methods it is inevitable so i not sure why content providers resist. I guess it is impossible to teach old dog new tricks. My apps that I use are Windows 7 media pc, Netflix, Playon, Hulu.

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post