5 Comments

Summary:

Yahoo’s patent fight may end up targeting technologies like memcached and the those used by the Open Compute movement. Or maybe it’s just trying to join the Open Compute party and figured a veiled threat might be the best way.

3144163888_2112094a0b_z

Like some sea monster that destroys an entire harbor in its death throes, Yahoo’s patent fight may end up targeting open source infrastructure technologies such as memcached and the those used by the Open Compute movement. Or maybe it’s just trying to join the Open Compute party and figured a veiled threat might be the best way. Sarah Lacey picked up the news from Facebook’s revised S-1 yesterday afternoon, and while she portrays it as a giant troll lurking behind an innocent little girl, the other side isn’t in the story at all.

I know Yahoo is in a mess of trouble — what with patent trolling, a lying CEO and its stock in the toilet — but it’s a particularly bizarre move to go after technologies that your company directly benefits from. Yahoo, for example uses memcached, likely a version that has evolved over time thanks to the alleged infringement. Yes, patent trolls go after widely adopted technologies with an eye toward profit, but in this case it’s like Yahoo is putting a gift horse on notice that it may shoot it in the mouth.

So what does Yahoo want here? This isn’t a posture that will win it any friends. Without seeing the letter or getting a comment from Yahoo (I’ve reached out), this story feels incomplete. Here’s what we know so far. From the Facebook S-1, at the tail end of a section about Facebook’s ongoing patent fight with Yahoo:

For example, we received a letter dated April 23, 2012 from Yahoo indicating that they believe 16 patents they claim to hold “may be relevant” to open source technology they allege is being used in our data centers and servers. Yahoo has not threatened or initiated litigation with respect to matters described in this letter but it may do so in the future.

Lacey has a Facebook statement:

Yahoo’s letter takes aim not just at Facebook but at open source and energy-efficient green technologies developed and employed by countless innovative, forward-thinking companies and engineers. We’re defending vigorously against Yahoo’s current lawsuit, and would likewise do so against any new assertion.

This put Facebook in the cape defending against the machinations of the evil troll, but given Yahoo’s history in developing and open sourcing technologies that underlie the physical infrastructure of the web, it seems odd that it would suddenly reverse positions. Perhaps this is a negotiating ploy for a cross license that Facebook is spinning into drama, but I’m curious to see what’s going on here.

Image courtesy of Flickr user Stefan.

  1. Can’t Yahoo! just die off already, and stop trolling the advancements of modern companies?

    Share
  2. Do you know what patent trolling is? Yup, it’s what Facebook has done to defend itself against Yahoo, and not the other way around.

    Share
  3. It is remarkable how a storied Silicon Valley company like Yahoo! can, in one fiscal quarter and one CEO change, destroy a reputation it took the company more than 17 years to build.

    Share
  4. What does “energy-efficient green technologies” have to do with either the patents or open-source ? That sounds like gratuitous FB spin.

    As for patents of dubious merit, what about Zuckerberg’s software patent to display items from “friends” in the “news feeds” of users of social networks ? ( See http://answerguy.com/2010/02/25/patents-must-be-unique-facebook-7669123/ ).

    The U.S. Patent Office has become a sloppy pitch where rugby scrums are being played out by large firms trying to arm themselves with arsenals of software patents to use as medieval devices of feudal combat among warring fiefdoms. I mean, patents for linked lists ?? Displaying the name of an incoming caller on a cellphone using the contact list ?? Yada yada yada …

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post