2 Comments

akamavgspeed
Summary:

The U.S. is falling in the quality of broadband its ISPs are offering, although in the fourth quarter of 2011 that drop in speeds was seen by several other counties, with overall broadband speeds falling to a global average 2.3 Mbps from the previous quarter.

The U.S. is falling in the quality of broadband its ISPs are offering on a quarterly basis, although in the fourth quarter of 2011 that fall in speeds was seen by several other counties, with overall broadband speeds falling to a global average 2.3 Mbps from the third quarter to the fourth. The data comes from Akamai’s State of the Internet report, which uses the content delivery network’s data to construct a detailed report on web speeds, security and mobile connections. Om has covered the big picture, but here’s what the report says about the U.S.

For the year, the global average connection speed was up a 19 percent, with double-digit percentage growth seen in eight of the top 10 countries and also in the U.S., which is ranked 13th. The U.S.’s average connection speed is 5.8 Mbps — a 14 percent increase from the previous year.

Overall our average peak connection speeds ranged from 36 Mbps in Delaware down to 13.3 Mbps in Arkansas. The changes in those speeds were split fairly evenly, with growth in speeds in 24 states and the District of Columbia, and declines in 26 states. It’s important to note that Akamai measures this from folks connecting to get content off of its servers, so there are folks with broadband connections that might not be counted if they never manage to hit Akamai’s services (such is someone who only gets email).

Across the country Akamai saw a positive growth trend in broadband adoption in 48 states and the District of Columbia. Forty-two states saw broadband usage grow in excess of 10 percent year over year. Oddly, Maine and Hawaii residents saw their broadband adoption decline by  23 percent and 32 percent respectively.

There are five U.S. cities in the top 50 fastest global cities measured by the peak broadband speeds, led by Bergen County, N.J. with averages speeds of 40.7 Mbps. Unfortunately, it’s halfway down the global list at No. 24. It’s followed by Monterey Park, Calif. (ranked 38) with speeds of 36.3 Mbps; Cambridge, Mass.(38) with speeds of 35.1 Mbps; Staten Island, N.Y. (48) with speeds of 34 Mbps; and finally Fairfield, Calif. (50) with speeds of 33.8 Mbps. Japan and S. Korea cities dominate the list.

Overall the U.S. is doing well in terms of moving people up from really slow broadband speeds of 256 Kbps or less to Akamai’s 2 Mbps cutoff for broadband. Plus, nearly 44 percent of U.S. households are buying connections of 5 Mbps, which Akamai dubs high-speed broadband. That’s a boost of 23 percent from the fourth quarter of 2010. Perhaps all those streaming TV devices sold during Christmas of 2010 have contributed to folks boosting their broadband speeds. Also likely is the greater availability of faster cable broadband in the form of DOCSIS 3.0 upgrades. Globally high-speed broadband adoption is at 27 percent.

Akamai tracks the up and downs in speeds among the U.S. cities, but the big story there is California and the New England-area are the winners, experiencing both the fastest averages and peak speeds.

Akamai is optimistic that rural areas and the U.S. will see an overall boost in adoption and speeds asthe U.S. starts investing in reform measures that will allocate parts of people’s wireless and wireline phone bills for rural broadband deployment. However, in looking at the report, the biggest thing that comes to mind is everyone’s broadband experience is deeply local. If you’re lucky enough to live in an area with high speeds, pat yourself (or maybe Verizon) on the back.

  1. WillieFDiazSF Monday, April 30, 2012

    Part of the reason broadband in the USA sucks has to do with Duopolies like Verizon and AT&T. Sure they were able to get their lines opened up for copper and independent DSL companies flourished in the 1990′s but since the advent of Fiber and Cable Internet, no one in the government has forced the telecom and cable companies to open up their copper cable or fiber lines to competition. Even more so, these companies like Comcast, Time Warner, AT&T and Verizon have monopolies or duopolies in their respective markets, meaning without any competition there is no reason to provide faster or more widespread internet lines. Going further, the market is paying 2, 3, even 4x the amount that overseas internet companies charge for access. So with paychecks coming in that are in the $50-80 per month for slow speed internet, the companies see no need to offer anything more. See no need to offer anything for less. See no need to expand.
    The next issue is mobile broadband, and with the connectivity rivaling and in my area, exceeding cable, DSL, and even fiber connectivity, it is yet again duopolies that are using this to their advantage. Without roaming or wholesale agreements to provide the existing infrastructure at a cost to outside markets to widespread the technology and speed to customers who might otherwise not be able to subscribe to landline based internet, the market will remain closed and limited as more and more people chose NOT to use the larger telecoms.
    Sad but true.

    Share
  2. The Fox-WSJ campaign against Google is doing well, so many people have become indoctrinated into anti-Google thinking now. It seems pretty clear Google has adopted a more corporate ethos since it’s early days but if you actually stepped back and looked at the ‘Big Picture’, nothing Google is doing now is as bad as what Big Telecom does to kill fair market principles, and compared to what Microsoft, Facebook, and Apple are doing as far as trying to commandeer the Internet as a walled-garden, vendor-ruled, locked down environment, Google is still playing a cleaner game. So pick your poison, but at least target your blame in the right direction. There is no perfect solution when it comes to consumers and the Internet.

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post