<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A brief history of Microsoft&#8217;s e-reader efforts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/04/30/a-brief-history-of-microsofts-e-reader-efforts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/04/30/a-brief-history-of-microsofts-e-reader-efforts/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:22:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZATZAi</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/04/30/a-brief-history-of-microsofts-e-reader-efforts/#comment-837388</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ZATZAi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 04:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=515737#comment-837388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glad someone remembers their tech history. Don&#039;t forget that Microsoft&#039;s eReader push arguably died long before e-ink devices like the Kindle came to market and that Barnes &amp; Noble (Among others) made a big investment into Microsoft&#039;s ebooks with their own storefront which has long since closed. They weren&#039;t they only ebook seller for .lit books, but they were one of the bigger ones and this was well before Amazon got involved.

So Barnes &amp; Noble has had a relationship with Microsoft in regards to ebooks one way or another for quite some time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad someone remembers their tech history. Don&#8217;t forget that Microsoft&#8217;s eReader push arguably died long before e-ink devices like the Kindle came to market and that Barnes &amp; Noble (Among others) made a big investment into Microsoft&#8217;s ebooks with their own storefront which has long since closed. They weren&#8217;t they only ebook seller for .lit books, but they were one of the bigger ones and this was well before Amazon got involved.</p>
<p>So Barnes &amp; Noble has had a relationship with Microsoft in regards to ebooks one way or another for quite some time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/04/30/a-brief-history-of-microsofts-e-reader-efforts/#comment-837188</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=515737#comment-837188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, just one dozen. ;) Part of the issue was timing but Microsoft had implementation problems as well: limited deals with booksellers, activation frustration and Microsoft-only platform support.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, just one dozen. ;) Part of the issue was timing but Microsoft had implementation problems as well: limited deals with booksellers, activation frustration and Microsoft-only platform support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Adams</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/04/30/a-brief-history-of-microsofts-e-reader-efforts/#comment-837158</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Adams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=515737#comment-837158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[dozens of years of screwing it up you mean!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dozens of years of screwing it up you mean!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
