12 Comments

Summary:

Cisco in an internal memo outlined its plans for the changing nature of networking. It also acknowledged a $100 million investment in Insieme, a company started by three Cisco executives and that it can buy it for upto $750 million. Read the memo & what it means.

cisco

Earlier this morning, The New York Times wrote about an internal memo in which Cisco Systems outlined its plans for software defined networking. More importantly, it also shared the news that it has invested $100 million in Insieme, a company started by Mario Mazzola, Prem Jain, and Luca Cafiero.

In addition, Cisco can buy the start-up for upto $750 million. Insieme, which has been aggressively trying to woo engineers from its rivals, is hoping to build new kinds of switching gear to compete with current market leaders such as Arista Networks and emerging players.

Cisco has made an investment of $100 million in Insieme, an early-stage company focused on research and development in the datacenter market. It was founded by Mario Mazzola, Luca Cafiero, and Prem Jain in February 2012. Cisco also has the right to purchase the remaining interests of Insieme, with a potential payout range of up to $750 million that will be based primarily on the sales and profitability of Insieme products through Cisco. [Full Internal Cisco Memo below]

Cisco has used this concept of spin-ins before and often they involved the same three founders — Mazzola, Jain, and Cafiero. However, when I read this memo, I see a company making a tactical admission that it has become so big, so bureaucratic and so broken that it cannot count on internal teams to build any ground breaking products. The SDN memo, at least from my perspective, sends the wrong message to Cisco’s engineering corps: you are worth more outside than you are inside Cisco.

Cisco which has made a fortune from selling routers and switches should be thinking about developing next generation platforms. The fact it can’t shows that as a company it has become addicted to the old way of doing things.

Cisco boasts that nearly 70 percent of the Internet runs on its gear. Except Google and Facebook don’t use Cisco. And neither do many of the emerging web scale companies. Cisco, of course dismissed Juniper Networks and later the Chinese threat. Anyway that is a story for another day.

SDN: Evolving the Network as a Platform

2012-Apr-17

Market trends such as cloud, mobility and video and the proliferation of data highlight the vital role the network plays today. The network is no longer a cost center; it is central to revenue generation and strategy execution. This has led to an increased need for customers to have greater control over the network (and IT infrastructure, in general) paving the way for emerging trends such as software defined networking (SDN), which promises to make the network more agile, scalable, and cost-effective.

While there is debate over whether this evolution is occurring today or coming in the near future, one thing is certain: Cisco intends to lead this change.

“Cisco believes SDN is part of our vision of the intelligent network that is more open, programmable, and application aware—a vision in which the network is transformed into a more effective business enabler, says Padmasree Warrior, CTO and co-leader Engineering.

Because SDN is still in its embryonic stage, a consensus has yet to be reached on its exact definition. Some equate SDN with OpenFlow or decoupling of control and data planes. Cisco’s view transcends this definition.

“If you ask five customers what SDN means to them, you may get five different answers. Customer motivations and expectations are different based on their business problem or deployment scenario,” Warrior says.

Unlike any other company, Cisco is unique in its experience, expertise, and breadth to help customers evolve their networks in a phased manner, offering both innovation and investment protection.

Playing to Cisco Strengths, Priorities

While SDN concepts like network virtualization may sound new, Cisco has played a leadership role in this market for many years leveraging its build, buy, partner strategy. For example, Cisco’s Nexus 1000V series switches—which provide sophisticated NX-OS networking capabilities in virtualized environment down to the virtual machine level—are built upon a controller/agent architecture, a fundamental building block of SDN solutions. With more than 5,000 customers today, Cisco has been shipping this technology for a long time.

“SDN plays into at least two of Cisco’s top five priorities—core routing/switching and data center/virtualization/cloud,” says Warrior.

Cisco has the opportunity to shape and define the SDN market because it is still perceived as an emerging technology, Warrior says. In fact, Cisco innovation will be much deeper than just SDN.

Cisco is operating from established positions of strength, which include the scale of its operating systems, superior ASICS, unique embedded intelligence, experienced engineering expertise, and an expansive installed base—most of which has no interest in completely replacing what it has already invested in so heavily.

“When you look at the breadth of our customer base—from universities to large enterprises to Service Providers —you quickly see that there is no one-size-fits-all solution in terms of implementing SDN,” says Warrior. “So it’s a matter of ‘turning on’ this functionality in a use-case led manner that allows customers to tailor their infrastructure to business priorities, while maintaining as much investment protection as possible.”

“Many of our peers are just starting to recognize the strategic value of the network that Cisco has always articulated—and the majority of them are still at the starting line,” says Warrior. “We understand this is a marathon—not a sprint—and Cisco has the most comprehensive set of capabilities to address the emerging requirements under the SDN umbrella, better than any other company.”

Investing in SDN Through Build, Buy, Partner Strategy

Cisco’s innovation strategy continues to leverage a build, buy, partner approach. Our network programmability efforts align with this strategy.

Cisco has made an investment of $100 million in Insieme, an early-stage company focused on research and development in the datacenter market. It was founded by Mario Mazzola, Luca Cafiero, and Prem Jain in February 2012. Cisco also has the right to purchase the remaining interests of Insieme, with a potential payout range of up to $750 million that will be based primarily on the sales and profitability of Insieme products through Cisco.

Insieme’s product development efforts are complementary to that of Cisco’s current and planned internal investments. Insieme and other internal programs will be components of Cisco’s broader programmability framework. These types of investments have strongly benefitted Cisco in the past, and we will continue to look for similar ways to complement our internal development capabilities.

More details regarding Cisco’s investment in Insieme will be disclosed in Cisco’s upcoming 10Q filing in May.

Defining the Strategy

Warrior says Cisco’s SDN strategy is part of our on-going investment to ensure that the networks we deploy are the most agile, open, and programmable. This includes everything from silicon to software, as well as supporting industry-developed protocols such as OpenFlow and OpenStack.

Collaboration will be key. Cisco’s SDN strategy is led by Engineering with involvement from experts from various teams such as Network Operating Systems Technology Group (NOSTG), Data Center Group, Service Provider Architecture Group, Global Marketing and Corporate Communications (GMCC), Sales, as well as support teams from Finance and Legal. As it is tied to several of the company’s key foundational priorities, progress will be reviewed and monitored by the Operating Committee in regular quarterly business reviews.

“Our strategy is to continue to offer choices to our customers so that they are not forced to go down a single path,” Warrior says. “We have a multipronged approach that goes beyond current perceptions of SDN, leveraging business-based use cases as building blocks so that we achieve architectural consistency and bring to bear the richness of all our capabilities.”

Warrior adds that Cisco already builds a lot of intelligence into its network silicon and software. Making them open and programmable will further unlock the value, while enabling further application awareness.

“Cisco understands networking better than any other company,” Warrior says, noting that Cisco-built networks that power majority of the Internet today. “Whether we partner, build or buy, Cisco is well positioned to continue to lead with the evolution of SDN.”

Over the next 6-12 months, Cisco is expected to unveil its external approach with new products and solutions, including SDN capabilities that make the network more open and programmable. Stay tuned for more information on Cisco’s strategy in this space.

  1. “Our strategy is to continue to offer choices to our customers so that they are not forced to go down a single path,” Warrior says. “We have a multipronged approach that goes beyond current perceptions of SDN, leveraging business-based use cases as building blocks so that we achieve architectural consistency and bring to bear the richness of all our capabilities.”

    Reads to me like:
    We will hold a lot of focus groups and create a bloated mess.

    Share
    1. Nah, it is more like, we are going to turn OpenFlow into Cisco flow, as per Mark Berly’s comments.

      Share
  2. Sounds like the Cisco vision is ClosedFlow, note the comment:

    “Because SDN is still in its embryonic stage, a consensus has yet to be reached on its exact definition. Some equate SDN with OpenFlow or decoupling of control and data planes. Cisco’s view transcends this definition.”

    Share
  3. Is that big quote the memo? It’s written like a press release. Do they think leaking it gives more cred than releasing it officially?

    Share
    1. Wes

      it is their memo and you might be right.

      Share
  4. Wow. Mario Mazzola, Prem Jain, and Luca Cafiero trifecta strikes again. Why does it feel like a racket to me?

    Share
  5. David McCulloch Thursday, April 19, 2012

    Hi Om,

    We should have you spend some more time with Cisco if you’re open to it. You’ve leapt to a pretty odd conclusion about our strategy. Cisco’s strategy has always been to build, buy and partner our way to profitable growth. Investments in start-ups and acquisitions have complemented organic innovation at Cisco for decades.

    To be clear, organic Cisco innovation in hardware, software, physical, virtual, compute and networking will be crucial to how we address networking programmability at a holistic level.

    By making an investment in Insieme we’re merely augmenting our in-house engineering efforts with a bet that we believe could be complementary, not duplicative, or instead of, our home-grown engineering.

    For the record, some of the largest ‘emerging web scale’ companies in the world today are actually Cisco’s BIGGEST Nexus and NX-OS switching customers. It’s just plain wrong to suggest this category of company doesn’t use Cisco.

    Lastly, and in a similar vein, you overlooked the fact that the New York Times article stated that “a top engineer at Google said Cisco would likely be among the leading players in S.D.N.”

    Regards,

    David McCulloch
    Director, Corporate Communications
    Cisco

    Share
    1. David

      Happy to talk. You know where to reach me and as always I am open to conversation.

      Also, refer to Stacey’s piece that was posted today.

      Share
    2. cisco is pooping their pants about SDN (particularly Openflow) and is desperately trying to save a sinking ship. We can read between the lines and spin. Google knows what’s up.

      Share
    3. BradReeseCom Friday, April 20, 2012

      Hi David,

      Why is Cisco’s Board of Directors allowing scandalously exorbitant corporate compensation shenanigans on such an epic scale?

      It’s my personal opinion that Cisco CEO John Chambers is doing an “end-run” around federal securities laws by using his “spin-in” strategy to evade his Board of Directors corporate compensation guidelines and its up to Cisco employees to report this to the SEC.

      Note: You are not required to be a Cisco employee to receive a monetary award from the SEC.

      Sincerely,

      Brad Reese

      Share
  6. Abner Germanow Thursday, April 19, 2012

    While Cisco might want everyone to think SDN is years away, reality says otherwise. Openflow certainly has some maturing to do, but there are SDN powered products shipping today.

    Juniper’s QFabric is a great example of a fully integrated software defined network. Juniper split the data and control planes in it’s routers eons ago. Distributing that control plane and running it on x86 gear, however is the really hard part of solving both the opex and capex challenges of a datacenter network.

    Everything else in the datacenter has changed, except for the network. Solving the datacenter network problem for the next decade requires new physical and software architectures. It’s fantastic to see Stacy and you covering this transition with such gusto. Customers have more choices than ever. The explosion of networking start-ups, merchant silicon, and the rise of the network programer means the network industry will likely look very different 10 years from now. Game on.

    Share
  7. Cisco stock has been sitting at $20 for 10 years not even accounting for inflation. During the same period the Insieme trio have pocketed hundreds of millions. Whatever the spin about spin-ins, it does not pass the smell test. Product innovations or not, top Cisco executives and the Insieme folks seem to have figured out the secret sauce to defraud shareholders successfully and repeatedly.

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post