With OS X Mountain Lion arriving sometime this summer, Apple is continuing the strategy begun with OS X Lion of integrating some iOS features into OS X. It added things like iMessage, system-level Twitter integration and notifications, but there are still features not in Mountain Lion that I’d like to see migrate from iOS to OS X some day.
Siri and Dictation
These two are obvious and practically certain additions to the Mac, as they’ve become flagship features on iOS — Dictation has already migrated from the iPhone 4S to the new iPad. The only questions are when they’re coming and how they’re going to work. I have no idea as to the former, but the latter is something we can have a little fun with. The way Notification Center is implemented in the Mountain Lion developer previews gives us some hints as to how Siri will be implemented as well. Notification Center slides out from the right side of the screen, triggerable with a two-finger gesture. The same design would work well for Siri, except on the left side, with a similar gesture.
As for Dictation, I would imagine that Apple could add a new dictation key to the Mac keyboard, similar to how there’s a key on iOS’s virtual keyboard. Apple has historically made slight changes to the Mac’s keyboard to reflect new features in OS X, such as adding a Launchpad key to new Macs running Lion.
Siri and Dictation on the iPhone gave us a glimpse of a future where we’re surrounded by technology that can recognize and understand our words. Bringing them to the Mac would make many tasks far easier and more accessible.
iBooks, Voice Memos, Maps, YouTube
In OS X Mountain Lion, Apple has ported over the Notes and Reminders apps from iOS. It would be useful and make sense for Apple to do the same with the remaining Apple-developed apps on iOS, like Voice Memos and iBooks. On Lion, you can manage voice memos and iBooks within iTunes, but you can’t create new voice memos or read iBooks. Separating these features into apps would rectify this.
Then there’s Maps and YouTube, both of which are Google services, a company Apple has a somewhat frosty relationship with at the moment. It seems possible that Apple could switch to using its own mapping solution, and build an OS X Maps client from that. Apple’s bought several map companies over the last few years, including Poly9, C3 Technologies and Placebase. They’re also using data from OpenStreetMap — which is in the iOS version of iPhoto rather than Google’s map data. A dedicated YouTube app for the Mac, on the other hand, is pretty unlikely. Building a competing service would likely take too long and cost too much, and wouldn’t provide much utility over just loading YouTube in a browser.
An invisible file system
Apple is in the delicate transiton period on the Mac, slowly making the Finder easier to use. In OS X Lion, the Home folder is hidden by default in favor of including all the folders within in the Finder’s sidebar, for instance. Apple’s logic is that nobody opens their music folder to play music, or their pictures folder to look at photos. They open iTunes and iPhoto instead. So, why are we keeping those folders around?
With the Finder, you can’t interact with a file in the best way that suits it; each file is presented in the same way. This is the opposite of what the iPhone is: a screen that transforms to suit whatever task is being done. If Apple can pull off a similar system for the Mac that’s better than the Finder, I’d be all for it. It won’t be easy to upend such an old and entrenched feature of computing, but if any company can do it, it’s Apple.
A decentralized iTunes
On a Mac, iTunes is the end-all, be-all for managing media: music, TV shows, movies, device syncing and a media store are all wrapped into one application. The opposite is true of iOS, which separates the functions of iTunes into mutiple apps: Music, Video and iTunes. Apple’s current strategy of migrating features of iOS to OS X gives them the opportunity to trim the fat and “decentralize” iTunes, breaking it into multiple apps in the same manner as iOS.
A decentralized iTunes would be make Macs more familiar to iOS users, playing to Apple’s strength of tight integration between products. It’s the same thing they’re doing with Mountain Lion by bringing the Reminders and Notes apps over.
Apple already has the pieces in place to do this. With iOS 5, the Music app on the iPad was redesigned with a skeuomorphic look, unlike its predecessor which closely resembled iTunes. To me, this seems like possible preparation for a future OS X port. I’ve made a simple mockup of how this might look, to illustrate:
Universal apps and automatic app downloads
There are apps that are made for the iPhone and iPad, as well as the Mac, like Apple’s iWork and iLife suites. Currently, you can buy an app on the iPhone and it works on the iPad as well, but the same doesn’t apply to the Mac, so you end up paying for the desktop version too. Allowing universal apps would solve this. Mac apps couldn’t truly be universal, as iOS apps are compiled to run on ARM’s architecture and not Intel’s. That doesn’t mean Apple can’t create the illusion of universality, though. Developers could mark their Mac apps as universal with their iOS counterparts and have the Mac App Store download them for free if the user already has the iOS version.
Which brings me to automatic downloads, another feature that I’d love to see on the Mac. Download an iOS app, and its Mac counterpart automatically downloads as well. Of course, this feature would only be available for Mac App Store apps, leaving developers that haven’t adopted it out in the cold, even if they also develop iOS apps. It would make a stronger case for adopting it, however, though it would mean forking over a 30 percent cut of sales to Apple.
We can already back up our iOS devices to iCloud, so why not our Macs? Of course, you’re thinking that most Mac hard drives are far too big for Apple’s servers to handle. iOS backups don’t back up the entire OS, however. Instead, they back up important settings, such as app data and the layout of the home screen. The backup for my 16 GB iPhone only takes up 1.3 GB of space on iCloud, and my 16 GB iPad’s backup takes even less at 280 MB. Granted, a Mac’s hard drive can be quite a bit bigger, but I can’t imagine its backup would be so much more than an iOS device that iCloud couldn’t handle it in the future.
Saving web apps
In mobile Safari, you can choose to save a web page to the home screen, where it’ll run in its own web view and act as its own app. This feature was actually in the first developer preview of Safari 4 for OS X, released back in 2008. There was an extra command in the File menu that allowed you to save a web page as an app in the Dock. Apple removed the functionality from the final version, for unexplained reasons.
It’s possible that Apple removed the feature because it wasn’t the right time. Maybe they’re waiting for a bigger parity in features between OS X and iOS. Either way, I hope they bring it back.
What do you think? What other features do you want Apple to bring to the Mac?