<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google glasses make sense as the &#8220;next&#8221; mobile device</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/04/04/google-glasses-make-sense-as-the-next-mobile-device/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/04/04/google-glasses-make-sense-as-the-next-mobile-device/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:03:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: swapnil rathod</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/04/04/google-glasses-make-sense-as-the-next-mobile-device/#comment-843788</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[swapnil rathod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 19:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=507510#comment-843788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i want to try it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i want to try it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/04/04/google-glasses-make-sense-as-the-next-mobile-device/#comment-826668</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin C. Tofel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=507510#comment-826668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Take a number, Tal, and get in line behind me on that beta test. LOL! ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a number, Tal, and get in line behind me on that beta test. LOL! ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tal</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/04/04/google-glasses-make-sense-as-the-next-mobile-device/#comment-826654</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=507510#comment-826654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All I have to say is Shut Up GOOGLE and Take My Money!
Seriously would love to beta test it for them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I have to say is Shut Up GOOGLE and Take My Money!<br />
Seriously would love to beta test it for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Bee</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/04/04/google-glasses-make-sense-as-the-next-mobile-device/#comment-826652</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Bee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 15:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=507510#comment-826652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I disagree.  I think you are over-simplifying as well as focussing far too much on a bias you seem to have about power consumption, which I don&#039;t see as having much to do with it at all. 

Earbuds caught on and became &quot;acceptable&quot; simply because so many people were using devices that one&#039;s life would be cacophonous if people didn&#039;t wear them.  It was the sheer number of mobile media players in use that did it, not power savings.  Nothing to do with Physics at all.  

If Google glasses offer some real advantages (doubtful at best) then they will be used although early adopters will be scorned and ridiculed.  At some point, if there is enough people using them, they will seem &quot;acceptable&quot; all of a sudden and this will drive a second wave of adoption.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree.  I think you are over-simplifying as well as focussing far too much on a bias you seem to have about power consumption, which I don&#8217;t see as having much to do with it at all. </p>
<p>Earbuds caught on and became &#8220;acceptable&#8221; simply because so many people were using devices that one&#8217;s life would be cacophonous if people didn&#8217;t wear them.  It was the sheer number of mobile media players in use that did it, not power savings.  Nothing to do with Physics at all.  </p>
<p>If Google glasses offer some real advantages (doubtful at best) then they will be used although early adopters will be scorned and ridiculed.  At some point, if there is enough people using them, they will seem &#8220;acceptable&#8221; all of a sudden and this will drive a second wave of adoption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aepxc</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/04/04/google-glasses-make-sense-as-the-next-mobile-device/#comment-826567</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aepxc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 09:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=507510#comment-826567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was thinking less about the information displayed, and more about the information that needs to be captured and processed (which, pretty clearly will not be done on the glasses itself) in order for the results to be displayed on the glasses in, pretty much, realtime.

We are not close to there, and by the time we are, a more elegant solution may well present itself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking less about the information displayed, and more about the information that needs to be captured and processed (which, pretty clearly will not be done on the glasses itself) in order for the results to be displayed on the glasses in, pretty much, realtime.</p>
<p>We are not close to there, and by the time we are, a more elegant solution may well present itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Brisman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/04/04/google-glasses-make-sense-as-the-next-mobile-device/#comment-826519</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Brisman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 07:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=507510#comment-826519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Awe yeah! Love Google and love every single product by Google!
Have you seen another leaked video on Project Glass?
See here; http://bit.ly/Hfe0yM]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awe yeah! Love Google and love every single product by Google!<br />
Have you seen another leaked video on Project Glass?<br />
See here; <a href="http://bit.ly/Hfe0yM" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/Hfe0yM</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yuryprokashev</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/04/04/google-glasses-make-sense-as-the-next-mobile-device/#comment-826501</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yuryprokashev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 06:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=507510#comment-826501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IMHO, these glasses makes beautiful girl on the photo above looks weird.
I doubt she will wear those glasses daily.

Google glasses is quite a niche product, suitable ONLY when you have your hands occupied with something else.
E.g. driving home in the traffic jam.
I doubt many people will adopt glasses as daily gadget to wear.
And here is why:

Glasses idea is invention of XIII century. And it&#039;s construction, although drastically improved, still make them very uncomfortable to use.

In other words: using glasses is big trade-off between their benefits on one side and discomfort of using them on another.

1) You won&#039;t wear them 100% your daily time.
2) It means, you have to store them somewhere = one more case you need to take and care of.
3) Glasses are quite less durable than solid piece of glass or plastic - they have earpieces.
4) Glasses never fit 100% to your face and nose = you always have to correct their position on your nose.

Using glasses as daily communication gadget is nightmare, because using glasses daily is nightmare.
Especially for those, who never tried it before.
I don&#039;t think &quot;augmented reality&quot; will make glasses a replacement of smartphones for daily use.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO, these glasses makes beautiful girl on the photo above looks weird.<br />
I doubt she will wear those glasses daily.</p>
<p>Google glasses is quite a niche product, suitable ONLY when you have your hands occupied with something else.<br />
E.g. driving home in the traffic jam.<br />
I doubt many people will adopt glasses as daily gadget to wear.<br />
And here is why:</p>
<p>Glasses idea is invention of XIII century. And it&#8217;s construction, although drastically improved, still make them very uncomfortable to use.</p>
<p>In other words: using glasses is big trade-off between their benefits on one side and discomfort of using them on another.</p>
<p>1) You won&#8217;t wear them 100% your daily time.<br />
2) It means, you have to store them somewhere = one more case you need to take and care of.<br />
3) Glasses are quite less durable than solid piece of glass or plastic &#8211; they have earpieces.<br />
4) Glasses never fit 100% to your face and nose = you always have to correct their position on your nose.</p>
<p>Using glasses as daily communication gadget is nightmare, because using glasses daily is nightmare.<br />
Especially for those, who never tried it before.<br />
I don&#8217;t think &#8220;augmented reality&#8221; will make glasses a replacement of smartphones for daily use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julien Chabe</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/04/04/google-glasses-make-sense-as-the-next-mobile-device/#comment-826464</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julien Chabe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 03:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=507510#comment-826464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Real question is would Sergey use that shit ?
If you use it, don&#039;t you think that you will just be on reply mode, there is nothing proactive in this service, you just consume and reply to content. That&#039;s what most people will do. I think that it is really interesting to create that but if we do like emails.. (noone really know how to use emails) then we create bullshit stuff just to make some cash.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Real question is would Sergey use that shit ?<br />
If you use it, don&#8217;t you think that you will just be on reply mode, there is nothing proactive in this service, you just consume and reply to content. That&#8217;s what most people will do. I think that it is really interesting to create that but if we do like emails.. (noone really know how to use emails) then we create bullshit stuff just to make some cash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/04/04/google-glasses-make-sense-as-the-next-mobile-device/#comment-826410</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 00:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=507510#comment-826410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not interested.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: batjam</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/04/04/google-glasses-make-sense-as-the-next-mobile-device/#comment-826355</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[batjam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 23:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=507510#comment-826355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The negative responses to head mounted displays remind me of similar attitudes demonizing early adopters wearing earbuds. Any social stigma was eventually seen as less important than the improved portable sound quality and power requirements reduced to 1/1000th of conventional speakers. These otherwise unachievable advantages were the result of the obvious physics involved. Namely, the closer the device to the sense organ the less the power required.  Portable devices now have the screen as the single biggest power drain (other than the GPS, and cell radios). Moving the display closer to the eye is the only way to reduce power while improving display quality and actually achieving hands-free use. Obviously this would denigrate touch interfaces. So don&#039;t give up on the remote cursor interface. Even this can be hands-free with a cursor steered with eye movement using &quot;blink-to-click&quot; together with voice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The negative responses to head mounted displays remind me of similar attitudes demonizing early adopters wearing earbuds. Any social stigma was eventually seen as less important than the improved portable sound quality and power requirements reduced to 1/1000th of conventional speakers. These otherwise unachievable advantages were the result of the obvious physics involved. Namely, the closer the device to the sense organ the less the power required.  Portable devices now have the screen as the single biggest power drain (other than the GPS, and cell radios). Moving the display closer to the eye is the only way to reduce power while improving display quality and actually achieving hands-free use. Obviously this would denigrate touch interfaces. So don&#8217;t give up on the remote cursor interface. Even this can be hands-free with a cursor steered with eye movement using &#8220;blink-to-click&#8221; together with voice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
