<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HetNet step 1: More LTE microcells than base stations by 2014</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/03/30/hetnet-step-1-more-lte-microcells-than-base-stations-by-2014/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/30/hetnet-step-1-more-lte-microcells-than-base-stations-by-2014/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:21:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Dolislager</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/30/hetnet-step-1-more-lte-microcells-than-base-stations-by-2014/#comment-825855</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Dolislager]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 14:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=505456#comment-825855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Things get real interesting when carriers start leaving macrocells in order to move to small cell networks.  The rent savings will be huge.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things get real interesting when carriers start leaving macrocells in order to move to small cell networks.  The rent savings will be huge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Fitchard</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/30/hetnet-step-1-more-lte-microcells-than-base-stations-by-2014/#comment-824702</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Fitchard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 22:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=505456#comment-824702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I knew you were going to comment on this post, Simon!

To be fair, most of those femtos are private residential and business cells, not public access, right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew you were going to comment on this post, Simon!</p>
<p>To be fair, most of those femtos are private residential and business cells, not public access, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Saunders</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/30/hetnet-step-1-more-lte-microcells-than-base-stations-by-2014/#comment-824577</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon Saunders]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=505456#comment-824577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually - Small Cell Forum numbers indicate there&#039;ll be more femtocells than macrocells - across all technologies - before the end of *2012*!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually &#8211; Small Cell Forum numbers indicate there&#8217;ll be more femtocells than macrocells &#8211; across all technologies &#8211; before the end of *2012*!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Mackey</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/30/hetnet-step-1-more-lte-microcells-than-base-stations-by-2014/#comment-824576</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Mackey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=505456#comment-824576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems this sort of heterogeneous, roaming network could be the answer to wireless spectrum saturation? For example, if Verizon where to implement a system similar to FON, using a small portion of the bandwidth of their customers (an opt-in, discounted rate would be necessary) home and business fios connections, folks could be getting normal, seamless coverage in most metro areas but only occasionally using the carrier&#039;s actual wireless bandwidth.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems this sort of heterogeneous, roaming network could be the answer to wireless spectrum saturation? For example, if Verizon where to implement a system similar to FON, using a small portion of the bandwidth of their customers (an opt-in, discounted rate would be necessary) home and business fios connections, folks could be getting normal, seamless coverage in most metro areas but only occasionally using the carrier&#8217;s actual wireless bandwidth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
