6 Comments

Summary:

When a movie opens to nearly $153 million dollars, the studio executives backing it always tend to look like geniuses. But in the case of th…

Hunger Games1 460x307

When a movie opens to nearly $153 million dollars, the studio executives backing it always tend to look like geniuses. But in the case of the Lionsgate (NYSE: LGF) marketing department, what they did digitally to stoke buzz for youth-novel adaptation Hunger Games is earning them a particularly large amount of street cred among their envious peers. .

Emphasizing the creation of digital content based on writer Suzanne Collins’ popular source novel in lieu of more expensive ad buys, Lionsgate may have created a template for other studios to follow

“I can’t emphasize enough what they were able to accomplish with so little money,” said a marketing executive for a rival studio.

So what did Lionsgate do that was so impressive?

By now, every film studio in Hollywood has the basic tricks up their sleeve regarding use of social media. The game plan is essentially to buy promotion through Facebook and Twitter. And through those platforms, create and distribute inexpensively produced digital assets related to your film, like interactive games and still images, and get a core group of fans to start passing those elements around weeks or months before the movie comes out.

To amplify the impact of these campaigns, studios will pay the big social platforms — for Facebook, for example, they’ll often give up more than a doller per “like,” creating an illusion of social media buzz.

Lionsgate’s campaign differed from most movie campaigns because it created, well, actual social media buzz. The key: instead of paying for likes, the studio put its resources into creating rich-media elements that far outstrip the ambition of simple games and other movie collateral, such as an interactive tour of the source novel’s “Capital,” which was accessible through Facebook, Twitter and YouTube (NSDQ: GOOG). The tour wasn’t a movie ad — it was an interactive experience rendered from the book with painstaking detail.

“They simply appreciated the value of the book and fleshed out its world with a massive amount of content that’s designed to live on the web, well beyond what you see in the film itself,” the rival studio marketer said. “They activated the core fan base from day one, fired them up and let them carry the message to their friends, which in turn grew the fan base.”

In typical studio fashion, Lionsgate won’t reveal what it spent to create this premium content. But another rival studio executive told us it was a fraction of what a typical major-release digital campaign might entail.

Promotional costs for a big Hollywood movie typically exceed $100 million. But Lionsgate, a so-called mini-major, coming off a series of bombs, doesn’t have that kind of money. It had to make do with a marketing budget of around $45 million, with a typical allocation of 8 to 10 percent of that going to digital media spending.

  1.  Meh, I became aware of this film through good, old-fashioned in-theater trailers and TV interviews.

    Share
  2. Re: THG Social Media Marketing: “I can’t emphasize enough what they were able to accomplish with so little money,” said a marketing executive for a rival studio. 
    Creativity over spend does work occasionally in Hollywood.  Lionsgate was smart to roll the dice with this campaign; trusting a loyal fandom to help market the film online by empowering them with cool, original content. Watershed moment in Social Media Marketing!

    Share
  3. I think being a best seller as a book already probably made this pretty easy to do. If this was a movie without the best-seller status, I would be surprised if this campaign would have worked at all.

    Share
  4. The Hunger Games had a successful low-budget promotion campaign because it just needed to tap into the existing goodwill of fans of the book (which is what prompted the production of the movie). The marketing budget for “Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone” was $50 million.

    Share
  5. Actually they spent a great deal of money making the movie and the books were already a huge success on other people’s effort, time and money.
    That was the reason for the success – they had the content.
    The success is fantastic, but let’s not portray this as some humble low-cost social media tryout.

    Share
  6. Tara Heiser Thursday, May 3, 2012

    Truly successful marketing campaigns are all about the content. Lionsgate had a fantastic book series to start (great content) and created unique, interactive content to supplement (more great content). I think it’s great that they are focusing on valuable content rather than pushing photos and trailers. I haven’t been following this much but it would be cool if they had each of the main characters Tweeting to each other.

    Share

Comments have been disabled for this post