<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blip sheds partners: No money in Smart TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/03/22/blip-exits-boxee-samsung-vizio-sony/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/22/blip-exits-boxee-samsung-vizio-sony/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 10:42:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/22/blip-exits-boxee-samsung-vizio-sony/#comment-824138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 06:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=502665#comment-824138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s no place for UGC or related content on Connected TV that Blip specializes in because brand advertisers aren&#039;t willing to attach their money and brands to that type of content. The title &quot;there&#039;s no money in Smart TV&quot; is about as inaccurate as it could be. There growing numbers who are making a lot of money on Connected TV (Netflix, Hulu, GBTV, etc).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no place for UGC or related content on Connected TV that Blip specializes in because brand advertisers aren&#8217;t willing to attach their money and brands to that type of content. The title &#8220;there&#8217;s no money in Smart TV&#8221; is about as inaccurate as it could be. There growing numbers who are making a lot of money on Connected TV (Netflix, Hulu, GBTV, etc).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 6</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/22/blip-exits-boxee-samsung-vizio-sony/#comment-823348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[6]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 20:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=502665#comment-823348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John is right what is the cost apart from a different encode per platform.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John is right what is the cost apart from a different encode per platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/22/blip-exits-boxee-samsung-vizio-sony/#comment-822846</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 12:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=502665#comment-822846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is it costing Blip to appear on Boxee, PopBox, etc.?  If if it&#039;s not that much, I think it would be worth at least the exposure it brings to their service.  For instance, I had only known of Blip thru Boxee.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is it costing Blip to appear on Boxee, PopBox, etc.?  If if it&#8217;s not that much, I think it would be worth at least the exposure it brings to their service.  For instance, I had only known of Blip thru Boxee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/22/blip-exits-boxee-samsung-vizio-sony/#comment-822731</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[d]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 22:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=502665#comment-822731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps Blip should reposition as a branded channel instead of a platform? They would likely get better engagement rates if they were known as, say, the #1 source of cat videos.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Blip should reposition as a branded channel instead of a platform? They would likely get better engagement rates if they were known as, say, the #1 source of cat videos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Babak Rowshan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/22/blip-exits-boxee-samsung-vizio-sony/#comment-822497</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Babak Rowshan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 01:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=502665#comment-822497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this blip decision is part of a larger trend away from being a &quot;jack-of-all-trades&quot; which is youtubes strategy and towards specialization within their segment market, we&#039;ve already seen other video sites use it to carve out niches for themselves with less competition so I think blip will be successful]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this blip decision is part of a larger trend away from being a &#8220;jack-of-all-trades&#8221; which is youtubes strategy and towards specialization within their segment market, we&#8217;ve already seen other video sites use it to carve out niches for themselves with less competition so I think blip will be successful</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
