<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Klout really matters: Money, money, money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/03/13/why-klout-really-matters-money-money-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/13/why-klout-really-matters-money-money-money/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 18:48:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/13/why-klout-really-matters-money-money-money/#comment-821802</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 02:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=498264#comment-821802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Its not about the algorithm - and that&#039;s where i think Klout has it wrong.  The key is to have a platform that brings together the influencers and the marketers.  Check out SocialLadder - a brand new concept that just launched on the iPhone.  It&#039;s a turnkey platform that actually delivers on this...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its not about the algorithm &#8211; and that&#8217;s where i think Klout has it wrong.  The key is to have a platform that brings together the influencers and the marketers.  Check out SocialLadder &#8211; a brand new concept that just launched on the iPhone.  It&#8217;s a turnkey platform that actually delivers on this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Crets</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/13/why-klout-really-matters-money-money-money/#comment-820834</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas Crets]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 21:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=498264#comment-820834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with you here. I think Klout represents the first platform, and then the whole industry iterates from there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you here. I think Klout represents the first platform, and then the whole industry iterates from there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derrick Harris</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/13/why-klout-really-matters-money-money-money/#comment-820776</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derrick Harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 17:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=498264#comment-820776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not so much Klout as the idea of Klout. Anyone&#039;s algorithms can be flawed, but the idea of finding out who has influence in any given field is what matters.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not so much Klout as the idea of Klout. Anyone&#8217;s algorithms can be flawed, but the idea of finding out who has influence in any given field is what matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Gershenson</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/13/why-klout-really-matters-money-money-money/#comment-820611</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Gershenson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 21:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=498264#comment-820611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, I was with you until you brought Klout into the conversation. The concept of identifying influencers is valid, but when the algorithm is flawed to a degree (as Klout has been known to have wild swings that provide head-scratching opportunities), you could be calling someone more or less influential than they are. On the other hand, Twitter for example has a variety of established tools that can help evaluate the traction that someone has on that channel. I think it&#039;s better to go by channel and then identify the influencers within that channel. Because while it&#039;s a nice idea to look at one number for simplicity&#039;s sake, the problem is that it may be too simple. And worse, it may weigh certain channels far too much and ding solid authority figures for not being on that channel.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I was with you until you brought Klout into the conversation. The concept of identifying influencers is valid, but when the algorithm is flawed to a degree (as Klout has been known to have wild swings that provide head-scratching opportunities), you could be calling someone more or less influential than they are. On the other hand, Twitter for example has a variety of established tools that can help evaluate the traction that someone has on that channel. I think it&#8217;s better to go by channel and then identify the influencers within that channel. Because while it&#8217;s a nice idea to look at one number for simplicity&#8217;s sake, the problem is that it may be too simple. And worse, it may weigh certain channels far too much and ding solid authority figures for not being on that channel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moon Under Water</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/13/why-klout-really-matters-money-money-money/#comment-819055</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moon Under Water]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=498264#comment-819055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well written. The mentioned data conference might show up some interesting results. Social media control is certainly becoming a priority for many political broadcasters, and the data produced is becoming less and less protected (as in the recent case of Google&#039;s privacy policy opening up past search history to dictate potential search results).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well written. The mentioned data conference might show up some interesting results. Social media control is certainly becoming a priority for many political broadcasters, and the data produced is becoming less and less protected (as in the recent case of Google&#8217;s privacy policy opening up past search history to dictate potential search results).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
