<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s not curation or aggregation, it&#8217;s just how the Internet works</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/03/13/its-not-curation-or-aggregation-its-just-how-the-internet-works/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/13/its-not-curation-or-aggregation-its-just-how-the-internet-works/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:39:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: internacionalizacion</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/13/its-not-curation-or-aggregation-its-just-how-the-internet-works/#comment-822239</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[internacionalizacion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 03:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=498427#comment-822239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do you think then is the Mahalo o Demand Media behaviour?. Some think they are in the grey line...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think then is the Mahalo o Demand Media behaviour?. Some think they are in the grey line&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uninterested Party</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/13/its-not-curation-or-aggregation-its-just-how-the-internet-works/#comment-819905</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Uninterested Party]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=498427#comment-819905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fact that you can neither spell plagiarism or correctly interpret the article makes your comment highly suspect. There&#039;s nothing about a hyperlink intrinsically that is &quot;stealing,&quot; and there&#039;s nothing about attributing ideas to places where they have been shared and reshared that&#039;s stealing. What is stealing is taking original ideas and claiming they&#039;re your own--none of which is what anyone here is suggesting. 

This curation buzz is really an attempt to impose information management on a web that has more sources of information than anyone can possibly absorb, and to eliminate the annoyance of running into the same information more than once. In the end, it is a very entitled and irrational response to try and minimize the methods by which sites, blogs, and other people on the web share and remix the things they read, and clamp down on the development of new ideas based on or jumping off from old ones. It&#039;s sad.

In the end, someone is saying &quot;I&#039;m tired of reading the same things on so many blogs. I wish I could just get the original story delivered directly to me without having to prune my personal information consumption to accomplish that. I&#039;d rather make someone else do it for me, and while I&#039;m at it I&#039;ll eliminate the people who both derive from the original idea and improve upon it in one fell swoop--all for the sake of my own personal sanity, which I&#039;d rather give someone else responsibility for.&quot;

I can&#039;t wait for this fad to pass.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that you can neither spell plagiarism or correctly interpret the article makes your comment highly suspect. There&#8217;s nothing about a hyperlink intrinsically that is &#8220;stealing,&#8221; and there&#8217;s nothing about attributing ideas to places where they have been shared and reshared that&#8217;s stealing. What is stealing is taking original ideas and claiming they&#8217;re your own&#8211;none of which is what anyone here is suggesting. </p>
<p>This curation buzz is really an attempt to impose information management on a web that has more sources of information than anyone can possibly absorb, and to eliminate the annoyance of running into the same information more than once. In the end, it is a very entitled and irrational response to try and minimize the methods by which sites, blogs, and other people on the web share and remix the things they read, and clamp down on the development of new ideas based on or jumping off from old ones. It&#8217;s sad.</p>
<p>In the end, someone is saying &#8220;I&#8217;m tired of reading the same things on so many blogs. I wish I could just get the original story delivered directly to me without having to prune my personal information consumption to accomplish that. I&#8217;d rather make someone else do it for me, and while I&#8217;m at it I&#8217;ll eliminate the people who both derive from the original idea and improve upon it in one fell swoop&#8211;all for the sake of my own personal sanity, which I&#8217;d rather give someone else responsibility for.&#8221;</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t wait for this fad to pass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve rosenbaum</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/13/its-not-curation-or-aggregation-its-just-how-the-internet-works/#comment-819364</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve rosenbaum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=498427#comment-819364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a bit of important clarity - Aggregation and Curation are not interchangeable. Aggregation is an algorithmic solution that gathers content based on a predetermined formula. Curation is a human selection process, often with a technology providing a feed,  and a human editor making final choices and providing context.  Curation is core to the remix culture,  and when people simply cut and paste without adding value or editorial effort that&#039;s simply plagiarism. The difference is clear to any reader or content creator.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a bit of important clarity &#8211; Aggregation and Curation are not interchangeable. Aggregation is an algorithmic solution that gathers content based on a predetermined formula. Curation is a human selection process, often with a technology providing a feed,  and a human editor making final choices and providing context.  Curation is core to the remix culture,  and when people simply cut and paste without adding value or editorial effort that&#8217;s simply plagiarism. The difference is clear to any reader or content creator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plerudulier</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/13/its-not-curation-or-aggregation-its-just-how-the-internet-works/#comment-819243</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[plerudulier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 07:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=498427#comment-819243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reblogged this on &lt;a href=&quot;http://thingsigrab.wordpress.com/2012/03/14/its-not-curation-or-aggregation-its-just-how-the-internet-works/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Things I grab, motley collection &lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reblogged this on <a href="http://thingsigrab.wordpress.com/2012/03/14/its-not-curation-or-aggregation-its-just-how-the-internet-works/" rel="nofollow">Things I grab, motley collection </a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaleen Shah</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/13/its-not-curation-or-aggregation-its-just-how-the-internet-works/#comment-819151</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shaleen Shah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 01:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=498427#comment-819151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve wondered the same thing: How to curate properly..?  What is the standard, other than giving credit to where it&#039;s due?  I guess, it all comes down to common sense and a better judgement where ethics are called for.  Besides, context ( not content ) is king these days.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve wondered the same thing: How to curate properly..?  What is the standard, other than giving credit to where it&#8217;s due?  I guess, it all comes down to common sense and a better judgement where ethics are called for.  Besides, context ( not content ) is king these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CfC</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/13/its-not-curation-or-aggregation-its-just-how-the-internet-works/#comment-819107</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CfC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 23:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=498427#comment-819107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please consider that a hyperlink to an article could be a picture of my finger nail. If it was a picture of my finger nail, and not a photo thumbnail, a headline and the lead of the article, then it wouldn&#039;t really involve plagiarism would it?

So why do you think it&#039;s the nature of the Internet that makes stealing ok? I think it&#039;s people making choices.

You really need to understand that many hyperlinks are actually plaigerism.

Perhaps you don&#039;t understand that the Internet is made by people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please consider that a hyperlink to an article could be a picture of my finger nail. If it was a picture of my finger nail, and not a photo thumbnail, a headline and the lead of the article, then it wouldn&#8217;t really involve plagiarism would it?</p>
<p>So why do you think it&#8217;s the nature of the Internet that makes stealing ok? I think it&#8217;s people making choices.</p>
<p>You really need to understand that many hyperlinks are actually plaigerism.</p>
<p>Perhaps you don&#8217;t understand that the Internet is made by people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
