27 Comments

Summary:

Updated: Electric car startup Fisker Automotive pushed its long-delayed inaugural electric car to market before it was market-ready in order to try to meet government milestones, according to a former Fisker employee that left the company.

Row of Fisker Karmas

Fisker Karmas

Updated. Electric car startup Fisker Automotive pushed its long-delayed inaugural electric car to market before it was market-ready in order to try to meet government milestones for a loan, according to a former Fisker retailer employee that left the company. (Update 3/15/12: The Chronicle discloses more on the exec and I’ve corrected this article to reflect that the employee worked at a Fisker retailer, not as a full time Fisker employee).

Update 3/15/12: Fisker sent over a second statement that says these “allegations are absolutely untrue,” and the exec “was not privy to any business information from Fisker concerning the development of the Karma sedan and/or Fisker’s financing.”

Over the past few months, as hundreds of Fisker’s extended-range electric Karmas have been shipped to customers, some of the cars have had a variety of technical issues, including being recalled for a battery problem and requiring software upgrades, and Consumer Reports even reported last week that a Karma it had bought to test out died upon arrival.

Consumer Reports wrote in a blog post:

We buy about 80 cars a year and this is the first time in memory that we have had a car that is undriveable before it has finished our check-in process.

The former Fisker retailer employee said that it wasn’t uncommon for the first Karma cars to have technical issues, and said that was one reason for leaving the Fisker retailer — the employee now works at with electric car company Coda. The former retailer employee says that Fisker launched the car before it was market-ready in order to try to meet milestones from the Department of Energy for its loan. Fisker was awarded a $529 million loan award from the DOE in late 2009, but because the Karma was so delayed to market, Fisker had been unable to draw down on the rest of the DOE loan since May 2011.

I’ve contacted Fisker for a response and will update this when I hear back. Update 3/12/12: A Fisker spokesperson says to me: “Quality and customer satisfaction are the top priority for Fisker Automotive. With any new technology there will be unanticipated bugs and we have demonstrated the ability to quickly resolve them on a case-by-case basis. In addition, Fisker’s 24 hour VIP call centers and comprehensive vehicle warranty are also designed to give our customers complete peace of mind.”

It should be noted that given electric car technology is new, it’s not so uncommon for the first line of electric cars to face some of these types of issues — the first versions of Tesla’s Roadster faced a few recalls.

As a result of the DOE withholding the rest of the Fisker’s loan, Fisker said it has suspended production of its second car the Nina, which it was planning to build in Delaware. Fisker also says it is now looking for alternative funding to build Nina and to get its Karma cars to market.

A couple weeks ago Fisker brought in a new CEO, former Chrysler Chief Executive, Tom Lasorda, and said on a call with the media that Fisker is planning to be profitable in 2013 off of just the Karma line. Fisker said as of the end of February, it had produced 2,000 cars and shipped 840 of them to dealers and distributors. The extended electric car the Karma costs $100,000.

  1. PaloAltoWorldView Monday, March 12, 2012

    Who is this former Fisker employee who made this statement?

    Share
    1. Anonymity, ever heard of it? DUH!

      Share
    2. We found many job opportunities from this company in this websites http://www.usajobsnew.com/usa-job-sites.html

      Share
  2. @PaloAltoWorldView, I didn’t publish the person’s name.

    Share
    1. What these people have to do is stop promising stuff they can’t deliver… This nonsense where they want to roll out new bodystyles absolutely has to be shelved indefinitely (the production quality of Karma is apparently as good as a 1970s GM in terms of fit and finish). They need to focus on delivering a few hundred Karmas a month that are perfect for 2012… If they reach 3000 units, fine… 5000 units? Absolutely amazing….

      Simultaneously, they need to get Nina in a place they can show the world an engineering prototype by second half.

      Those things will begin to rebuild credibility. Endless announcements about bodystyles and bogus production targets that are multiples of even hypothetical market demand for a car most people have never heard of are just not useful.

      Share
    2. Katie, Did you verify if he ever actually worked directly for Fisker? I understand that he is being asked to retract his statement — since he WAS NOT AN EMPLOYEE!

      Share
      1. He worked for a Fisker retailer, so I corrected that.

        Share
  3. Is this car is available India?.

    Share
    1. I don’t think it is yet @Jilo Jose.

      Share
  4. “It should be noted that given electric car technology is new”
    Absolutely, as you can see in this video from … 1900: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnyoTDJttgs&feature=player_embedded

    Share
    1. It’s not historically new, but mass producing an electric sports cars is new. Tesla was the first one a couple years ago, and only produced the Roadster at like 2500

      Share
      1. Fisker is NOT an electric car!!! Come on people!!!

        Share
  5. Well Coda made a big deal about getting Thomas Fritz from Fisker last June.

    http://green.autoblog.com/2011/06/10/former-fisker-engineer-thomas-fritz-joins-coda/

    Share
  6. Thomas Fritz used to work at Fisker, he didn’t actually say that – it was leaked by a GM employee to the press as a insider tip. The same person who leaked does the PR at Coda which owned by General Motors. Coinciding with the Coda beinging assembly in Cali..China.

    Share
  7. so the roof solar panel produces 120W. as i once praised your articles katie do you have any idea if that’s enough to power the whole climate control system in summer, for how long?is that peak power 120W or average power output in normal (not cloudy) day? i was just wondering…

    Share
  8. Wow at least Fisker builds something instead of trafficking in sloppy speculative journalism. First consumer reports has to immediately blog about the breakdown and let 50 other websites copy the story — none of which picked up the resolution story 2 days later of course. Now we have these meaningless anonymous quotes from an employee who left for a chinese competitor, which get picked up as hard fact by another dozen copycat blogs. Anybody can speculate about what is the proper time to ship — Fisker is learning about deep quality control now. Where’s the deep quality control on these blogs?

    Share
  9. I’ve lost a lot of respect for you Katie. Your article was unsourced, uncorroborated and factually inaccurate. Any true journalist would be ashamed of themselves. This is especially true since you know full well that this story will be repeated, linked to, retweeted and further distored. This is not journalism, this is low integrity rumor mongering. You should hold yourself to a higher standard.

    Share
    1. The article wasn’t unsourced, it clearly had a source and the Chronicle used the same quote from the same source on the same subject. It also wasn’t rumor mongering, it was a person who worked closely with Fisker cars and had informed info about them. I also clarified the post to say he worked for a Fisker retailer, when Fisker said that. Sorry you feel that way.

      Share
      1. So how do you know the person had confidential information about the company, and had the ability to make such a major allegation? It is a pretty bold step to publish something like this. Either you are very brave or this is a career suicide when the truth comes out.

        Share
      2. @Inger, What is left to come out? I quoted an electric car exec who used to work for a Fisker retailer who said the Karma wasn’t ready to come out when it launched. As did the Chronicle. If the exec ends up retracting his statement, then I’d update the post with that.

        Share
      3. So you are saying you would take comments from someone who never had substantiated information, write any rumors, and news with no basis, and then if it changes you would simply update your comments? So guilty until proven innocent? what kind of crony journalism is this?

        Share

Comments have been disabled for this post