<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Verizon: In the game of 4G, spectrum trumps technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/03/06/verizon-in-the-game-of-capacity-spectrum-trumps-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/06/verizon-in-the-game-of-capacity-spectrum-trumps-technology/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 00:50:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cathy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/06/verizon-in-the-game-of-capacity-spectrum-trumps-technology/#comment-823245</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cathy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=494815#comment-823245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Kevin,

As you say, the 20 MHz of spectrum doesn&#039;t solve the 20-fold increase Verizon is projecting by YE 2015.  But 20 MHz NOW -- combined with the efficiency improvements from LTE Advance and HetNet architecture in 2013 and 2014 may.  The challenge for operators from a business perspective is WiFi is both complimentary and competitive.  Operators need to offer more control over the customer experience - not less - in order to compete with the OTT.  Hence why I think were seeing solutions like ALU&#039;s WiFi lightRadio.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kevin,</p>
<p>As you say, the 20 MHz of spectrum doesn&#8217;t solve the 20-fold increase Verizon is projecting by YE 2015.  But 20 MHz NOW &#8212; combined with the efficiency improvements from LTE Advance and HetNet architecture in 2013 and 2014 may.  The challenge for operators from a business perspective is WiFi is both complimentary and competitive.  Operators need to offer more control over the customer experience &#8211; not less &#8211; in order to compete with the OTT.  Hence why I think were seeing solutions like ALU&#8217;s WiFi lightRadio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Fitchard</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/06/verizon-in-the-game-of-capacity-spectrum-trumps-technology/#comment-817536</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Fitchard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 17:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=494815#comment-817536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Cathy, 

I definitely agree that the big efficiencies are coming later with LTE Advanced, and Verizon needs near term solutions as well. But what about Wi-Fi seems like a critical tool that&#039;s available today. It may just be a bandaid while waiting for the bigger cure, but it&#039;s probably cheaper than building denser networks for now. The point I&#039;m making is Verizon&#039;s picture is very bleak, so bleak, in fact, that a simple one-off 20 MHz spectrum sale would have very little impact. It can&#039;t be the whole picture.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Cathy, </p>
<p>I definitely agree that the big efficiencies are coming later with LTE Advanced, and Verizon needs near term solutions as well. But what about Wi-Fi seems like a critical tool that&#8217;s available today. It may just be a bandaid while waiting for the bigger cure, but it&#8217;s probably cheaper than building denser networks for now. The point I&#8217;m making is Verizon&#8217;s picture is very bleak, so bleak, in fact, that a simple one-off 20 MHz spectrum sale would have very little impact. It can&#8217;t be the whole picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cathy</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/06/verizon-in-the-game-of-capacity-spectrum-trumps-technology/#comment-817008</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cathy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 12:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=494815#comment-817008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is about managing interference.  Several of the mechanisms required to manage interference are just now being released in the standards - such as coordinated multiple point transmission, enhanced inter-cell interference, carrier aggregation, etc.  So near term, more spectrum is really the only card to be played.  Btw, the Hetnet cost/performance benefit is dependent on some of these features as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is about managing interference.  Several of the mechanisms required to manage interference are just now being released in the standards &#8211; such as coordinated multiple point transmission, enhanced inter-cell interference, carrier aggregation, etc.  So near term, more spectrum is really the only card to be played.  Btw, the Hetnet cost/performance benefit is dependent on some of these features as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Chapman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/06/verizon-in-the-game-of-capacity-spectrum-trumps-technology/#comment-816602</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oliver Chapman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 17:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=494815#comment-816602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevin - One Qualcomm report contrasting macro, small cell &amp; Wi-Fi is here - http://www.qualcomm.com/media/documents/files/a-comparison-of-lte-advanced-hetnets-and-wifi.pdf . Decent analysis of LTE and Wi-Fi specifically here - http://www.thinksmallcell.com/Technology/qualcomm-study-compares-lte-femtocells-with-wi-fi.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin &#8211; One Qualcomm report contrasting macro, small cell &amp; Wi-Fi is here &#8211; <a href="http://www.qualcomm.com/media/documents/files/a-comparison-of-lte-advanced-hetnets-and-wifi.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.qualcomm.com/media/documents/files/a-comparison-of-lte-advanced-hetnets-and-wifi.pdf</a> . Decent analysis of LTE and Wi-Fi specifically here &#8211; <a href="http://www.thinksmallcell.com/Technology/qualcomm-study-compares-lte-femtocells-with-wi-fi.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thinksmallcell.com/Technology/qualcomm-study-compares-lte-femtocells-with-wi-fi.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quickgamer88</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/06/verizon-in-the-game-of-capacity-spectrum-trumps-technology/#comment-816546</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[quickgamer88]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 15:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=494815#comment-816546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reblogged this on &lt;a href=&quot;http://quickgamer88.com/2012/03/07/743/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;quickgamer88&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reblogged this on <a href="http://quickgamer88.com/2012/03/07/743/" rel="nofollow">quickgamer88</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Fitchard</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/06/verizon-in-the-game-of-capacity-spectrum-trumps-technology/#comment-816523</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Fitchard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 14:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=494815#comment-816523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Steve, thanks for commenting. I missed you!

Did Qcom do a white paper on this? Got a link? I&#039;d love to see it as would some of our other readers I&#039;m guessing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Steve, thanks for commenting. I missed you!</p>
<p>Did Qcom do a white paper on this? Got a link? I&#8217;d love to see it as would some of our other readers I&#8217;m guessing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Peel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/06/verizon-in-the-game-of-capacity-spectrum-trumps-technology/#comment-816402</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christian Peel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 04:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=494815#comment-816402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Small cells are not a panacea.  The interference that is a problem in large cells is also a problem in small cells.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Small cells are not a panacea.  The interference that is a problem in large cells is also a problem in small cells.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Crowley</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/06/verizon-in-the-game-of-capacity-spectrum-trumps-technology/#comment-816350</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Crowley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 00:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=494815#comment-816350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are a couple of comments based on what&#039;s reported above (I haven&#039;t looked at the documents in this proceeding.) 

Verizon Wireless dismisses small cells as a remedy. At the same time, however, 45% partner Vodafone recently made small cells a pillar of its plan to increase capacity in the UK. See http://www.wilson-street.com/2011/11/femtocells-not-something-to-be-embarrassed-about/ Is there something that makes small cells good for one but not the other?

The notion of a 1.5x or 2x spectrum increase performing better than a small cell deployment doesn&#039;t make sense, when Qualcomm has analyses showing that a reasonable deployment of small cells in a macrocell provides a capacity gain of up to 10x in that macrocell. Indeed, Qualcomm is backing off the spectrum hype some and now saying that &quot;the next performance and capacity leap will come from network topology evolution by using a mix of macro cells and small cells – also referred to as a Heterogeneous Network (HetNet) – effectively bringing the network closer to the user.&quot; I agree. 

At the moment I&#039;m indifferent on the spectrum sale, but some of what&#039;s being offered in support doesn&#039;t make sense to me. One of the main points of LTE Advanced, which I presume Verizon Wireless will eventually migrate too, is to facilitate deployment of small cells to increase capacity many times over what one can do with spectrum alone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are a couple of comments based on what&#8217;s reported above (I haven&#8217;t looked at the documents in this proceeding.) </p>
<p>Verizon Wireless dismisses small cells as a remedy. At the same time, however, 45% partner Vodafone recently made small cells a pillar of its plan to increase capacity in the UK. See <a href="http://www.wilson-street.com/2011/11/femtocells-not-something-to-be-embarrassed-about/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wilson-street.com/2011/11/femtocells-not-something-to-be-embarrassed-about/</a> Is there something that makes small cells good for one but not the other?</p>
<p>The notion of a 1.5x or 2x spectrum increase performing better than a small cell deployment doesn&#8217;t make sense, when Qualcomm has analyses showing that a reasonable deployment of small cells in a macrocell provides a capacity gain of up to 10x in that macrocell. Indeed, Qualcomm is backing off the spectrum hype some and now saying that &#8220;the next performance and capacity leap will come from network topology evolution by using a mix of macro cells and small cells – also referred to as a Heterogeneous Network (HetNet) – effectively bringing the network closer to the user.&#8221; I agree. </p>
<p>At the moment I&#8217;m indifferent on the spectrum sale, but some of what&#8217;s being offered in support doesn&#8217;t make sense to me. One of the main points of LTE Advanced, which I presume Verizon Wireless will eventually migrate too, is to facilitate deployment of small cells to increase capacity many times over what one can do with spectrum alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob kelly</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/06/verizon-in-the-game-of-capacity-spectrum-trumps-technology/#comment-816339</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob kelly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 00:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=494815#comment-816339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice article, bottom line, if Verizon gets the spectrum then they will insure little chance for a smaller player with better technology to enter the market.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article, bottom line, if Verizon gets the spectrum then they will insure little chance for a smaller player with better technology to enter the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
