<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why a new Apple TV should share the stage with the iPad 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/03/01/new-apple-tv-ipad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/01/new-apple-tv-ipad/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eideard</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/01/new-apple-tv-ipad/#comment-814885</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eideard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=491958#comment-814885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How you access Siri is what I&#039;m waiting for.  I don&#039;t think folks want to raise their voice above existing sound levels while watching, say, a sports event to ask a question of a TV set 15 feet away.  I doubt if others in the room would enjoy it either.

OTOH if a question was addressed at a low volume to the remote in your hand - that wouldn&#039;t distract or bother anyone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How you access Siri is what I&#8217;m waiting for.  I don&#8217;t think folks want to raise their voice above existing sound levels while watching, say, a sports event to ask a question of a TV set 15 feet away.  I doubt if others in the room would enjoy it either.</p>
<p>OTOH if a question was addressed at a low volume to the remote in your hand &#8211; that wouldn&#8217;t distract or bother anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dBeats</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/01/new-apple-tv-ipad/#comment-814791</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dBeats]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 03:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=491958#comment-814791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A truly smart observation in a sea of missing home button theories! Bravo!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A truly smart observation in a sea of missing home button theories! Bravo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeroen Elfferich</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/03/01/new-apple-tv-ipad/#comment-814748</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeroen Elfferich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 23:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=491958#comment-814748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Ryan, always enjoy your articles, seems this time we were both thinking about the same thing at the same time. I have a somewhat different view on what &#039;new Apple TV&#039; will/should be, posted up at Appmarket.tv, interested to hear your thoughts: http://appmarket.tv/opinion/1570-smart-tv-dumb-tv.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ryan, always enjoy your articles, seems this time we were both thinking about the same thing at the same time. I have a somewhat different view on what &#8216;new Apple TV&#8217; will/should be, posted up at Appmarket.tv, interested to hear your thoughts: <a href="http://appmarket.tv/opinion/1570-smart-tv-dumb-tv.html" rel="nofollow">http://appmarket.tv/opinion/1570-smart-tv-dumb-tv.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
