<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cont3nt.com: Connecting videographers and news agencies around the world</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/02/23/cont3nt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/02/23/cont3nt/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 07:02:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton Gelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/02/23/cont3nt/#comment-814040</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anton Gelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=488889#comment-814040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Chris, as the article mentioned, we are in the midst of launching to the public and are currently in closed Beta on boarding our users. If you&#039;d like to join, feel free to sign up and we&#039;ll get you in, or if you have any particular questions, I&#039;d be happy to answer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris, as the article mentioned, we are in the midst of launching to the public and are currently in closed Beta on boarding our users. If you&#8217;d like to join, feel free to sign up and we&#8217;ll get you in, or if you have any particular questions, I&#8217;d be happy to answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton Gelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/02/23/cont3nt/#comment-814039</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anton Gelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=488889#comment-814039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Daniel - you may have mistyped the address - try again at http://cont3nt.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Daniel &#8211; you may have mistyped the address &#8211; try again at <a href="http://cont3nt.com" rel="nofollow">http://cont3nt.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/02/23/cont3nt/#comment-813504</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 04:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=488889#comment-813504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds interesting but the website doesn&#039;t seem like much more than a brochure. It&#039;s a find idea but is that all??]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds interesting but the website doesn&#8217;t seem like much more than a brochure. It&#8217;s a find idea but is that all??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/02/23/cont3nt/#comment-813503</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 03:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=488889#comment-813503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t see anything on cont3nt.com. is this an actual company?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see anything on cont3nt.com. is this an actual company?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton Gelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/02/23/cont3nt/#comment-813428</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anton Gelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=488889#comment-813428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton Gelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/02/23/cont3nt/#comment-813424</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anton Gelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 20:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=488889#comment-813424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Absolutely, even now when news organizations set up an international &quot;bureau&quot; it is usually 1 to 3 people - not nearly enough to cover their region. 

If they would just leverage the 1 million freelancers and 20-40 million new media semi-pros out there - it will change the game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely, even now when news organizations set up an international &#8220;bureau&#8221; it is usually 1 to 3 people &#8211; not nearly enough to cover their region. </p>
<p>If they would just leverage the 1 million freelancers and 20-40 million new media semi-pros out there &#8211; it will change the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton Gelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/02/23/cont3nt/#comment-813423</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anton Gelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 20:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=488889#comment-813423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a huge underlying problem for freelancers - in breaking news, there is not usually time for a written agreement - and media companies will often re-run/re-distribute/and sometimes re-sell content without permission. 

This is not done maliciously (and they are very concerned about resulting law suits) but without a written license agreement - the terms are often broken and the little guy usually loses money.

With Cont3nt.com both sides *must* agree to a license (either ours, theirs, or your own) prior to a sale and the licensing is attached to all the story packages. 

And since the transactions are all digital (unlike most link trucks/satellite connections) - there is complete control over downloads and user permissions, so others can&#039;t record from the broadcast feed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a huge underlying problem for freelancers &#8211; in breaking news, there is not usually time for a written agreement &#8211; and media companies will often re-run/re-distribute/and sometimes re-sell content without permission. </p>
<p>This is not done maliciously (and they are very concerned about resulting law suits) but without a written license agreement &#8211; the terms are often broken and the little guy usually loses money.</p>
<p>With Cont3nt.com both sides *must* agree to a license (either ours, theirs, or your own) prior to a sale and the licensing is attached to all the story packages. </p>
<p>And since the transactions are all digital (unlike most link trucks/satellite connections) &#8211; there is complete control over downloads and user permissions, so others can&#8217;t record from the broadcast feed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton Gelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/02/23/cont3nt/#comment-813416</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anton Gelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 20:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=488889#comment-813416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry for the long response there, that one got away from me :-D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the long response there, that one got away from me :-D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton Gelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/02/23/cont3nt/#comment-813415</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anton Gelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 20:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=488889#comment-813415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Breaking into the media industry is a notoriously difficult challenge, but we make it much easier – I can recommend 3 things - 

1. Shoot great content - enough said
2. Shoot with a buyer in mind - if it&#039;s local news, make the angle one that a local station/paper will want, if national/global - find the angle that they will need. Try to get in touch before-hand to see if there is anything they need.
3. Build a kick-ass Media Reputation and get it verified so they can trust you.

Good luck!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Breaking into the media industry is a notoriously difficult challenge, but we make it much easier – I can recommend 3 things &#8211; </p>
<p>1. Shoot great content &#8211; enough said<br />
2. Shoot with a buyer in mind &#8211; if it&#8217;s local news, make the angle one that a local station/paper will want, if national/global &#8211; find the angle that they will need. Try to get in touch before-hand to see if there is anything they need.<br />
3. Build a kick-ass Media Reputation and get it verified so they can trust you.</p>
<p>Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton Gelman</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/02/23/cont3nt/#comment-813410</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anton Gelman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 20:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=488889#comment-813410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;ve put your finger on the issue (can&#039;t help but make the long response) - the reason media relationships are made through personal connections is that it&#039;s very difficult to verify a piece of content (e.g. did a video come from the Lebanon, Sirya or Gaza) and while reasonable efforts are made in that regard, a media company is really deciding whether to trust the submitter. One false report will ruin a journalists reputation - that&#039;s why it&#039;s so valued and so trusted. 

So media has historically needed personal connections to establish relationships - but of course that&#039;s very limiting - a journalist that has worked with the BBC for 20yrs will need to re-establish the trust relationship if he wants to sell to the Washington Post and this is very difficult, and practically impossible in a real-time news cycle.

But the solutions for the &quot;trust problem&quot; have parallels all over the web e.g. you can buy a house or car on ebay with a large amount of security, without having ever met the seller - this is because of a user&#039;s established reputation. 

To establish trust, we enable a user to establish their Media Reputation - a deeply searchable online profile where they can showcase their portfolio, experience and credentials - we then allow them to get it &quot;verified&quot;. 

We will actually conduct a check of the credentials (if they want us to), we do not say whether the work is good or bad, but we verify that if a user claims to have worked for the AP for 20yrs - he has in fact done that. And of course a user can be referred by other credible users, and get feedback for all the work he sells.

Now when a media company sees that the user has a strong reputation, he has been verified, and CNN trusts him - that means others can as well.

And for those trying to break into the industry - a notoriously difficult challenge - the Media Reputation allows them to build their reputation so that they can move into the big leagues based on the quality of their work and the references they gather as they sell it - all without ever having met.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve put your finger on the issue (can&#8217;t help but make the long response) &#8211; the reason media relationships are made through personal connections is that it&#8217;s very difficult to verify a piece of content (e.g. did a video come from the Lebanon, Sirya or Gaza) and while reasonable efforts are made in that regard, a media company is really deciding whether to trust the submitter. One false report will ruin a journalists reputation &#8211; that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s so valued and so trusted. </p>
<p>So media has historically needed personal connections to establish relationships &#8211; but of course that&#8217;s very limiting &#8211; a journalist that has worked with the BBC for 20yrs will need to re-establish the trust relationship if he wants to sell to the Washington Post and this is very difficult, and practically impossible in a real-time news cycle.</p>
<p>But the solutions for the &#8220;trust problem&#8221; have parallels all over the web e.g. you can buy a house or car on ebay with a large amount of security, without having ever met the seller &#8211; this is because of a user&#8217;s established reputation. </p>
<p>To establish trust, we enable a user to establish their Media Reputation &#8211; a deeply searchable online profile where they can showcase their portfolio, experience and credentials &#8211; we then allow them to get it &#8220;verified&#8221;. </p>
<p>We will actually conduct a check of the credentials (if they want us to), we do not say whether the work is good or bad, but we verify that if a user claims to have worked for the AP for 20yrs &#8211; he has in fact done that. And of course a user can be referred by other credible users, and get feedback for all the work he sells.</p>
<p>Now when a media company sees that the user has a strong reputation, he has been verified, and CNN trusts him &#8211; that means others can as well.</p>
<p>And for those trying to break into the industry &#8211; a notoriously difficult challenge &#8211; the Media Reputation allows them to build their reputation so that they can move into the big leagues based on the quality of their work and the references they gather as they sell it &#8211; all without ever having met.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>