<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Despite critics, Cisco stands by its data deluge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/02/14/despite-critics-cisco-stands-by-its-data-deluge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/02/14/despite-critics-cisco-stands-by-its-data-deluge/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Bubley</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/02/14/despite-critics-cisco-stands-by-its-data-deluge/#comment-809831</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dean Bubley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 11:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=484461#comment-809831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...edit to my comment. Should read &gt;100% for 2012 vs. 2011]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;edit to my comment. Should read &gt;100% for 2012 vs. 2011</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Bubley</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/02/14/despite-critics-cisco-stands-by-its-data-deluge/#comment-809830</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dean Bubley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 11:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=484461#comment-809830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the VNI numbers look overstated. For instance, the detailed figures show forecast growth in both North America &amp; Western Europe predicted at &gt;100% for 2012 vs. 2010. Yet we have AT&amp;T at 40%, Vodafone Europe at 20%, Telefonica O2 as quite low or even flat... so unless VZW, Orange, T-Mo &amp; a couple of others are pushing 200%, there&#039;s no way that particular number can add up. I&#039;m also highly doubtful that the *average* smartphone user in 2016 will be doing 2.6GB/month - given that will probably include hundreds of millions in emerging markets with cheap $50 smartphones on &quot;thin&quot; networks and a $5 ARPU. There&#039;s some good stuff in VNI but some of the numbers don&#039;t, to me, pass the &quot;smell test&quot;.

Dean Bubley
Disruptive Analysis]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the VNI numbers look overstated. For instance, the detailed figures show forecast growth in both North America &amp; Western Europe predicted at &gt;100% for 2012 vs. 2010. Yet we have AT&amp;T at 40%, Vodafone Europe at 20%, Telefonica O2 as quite low or even flat&#8230; so unless VZW, Orange, T-Mo &amp; a couple of others are pushing 200%, there&#8217;s no way that particular number can add up. I&#8217;m also highly doubtful that the *average* smartphone user in 2016 will be doing 2.6GB/month &#8211; given that will probably include hundreds of millions in emerging markets with cheap $50 smartphones on &#8220;thin&#8221; networks and a $5 ARPU. There&#8217;s some good stuff in VNI but some of the numbers don&#8217;t, to me, pass the &#8220;smell test&#8221;.</p>
<p>Dean Bubley<br />
Disruptive Analysis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David H. Deans</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/02/14/despite-critics-cisco-stands-by-its-data-deluge/#comment-809519</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David H. Deans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=484461#comment-809519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also, keep in mind, some U.S. mobile service providers may intentionally be using a pricing strategy to send a message to the top 1% -- they actually don&#039;t want those customers.

Therefore, if you push customers to competitors (by whatever means), then you will surely experience a decline in data usage growth. My point: don&#039;t assume that a carrier&#039;s lower data usage growth is always viewed as a &quot;problem&quot; that needs to be resolved.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, keep in mind, some U.S. mobile service providers may intentionally be using a pricing strategy to send a message to the top 1% &#8212; they actually don&#8217;t want those customers.</p>
<p>Therefore, if you push customers to competitors (by whatever means), then you will surely experience a decline in data usage growth. My point: don&#8217;t assume that a carrier&#8217;s lower data usage growth is always viewed as a &#8220;problem&#8221; that needs to be resolved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Kelley</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/02/14/despite-critics-cisco-stands-by-its-data-deluge/#comment-809447</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Kelley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=484461#comment-809447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cisco is, if anything, underestimating the increase.  Everybody has experienced lagging mobile broadband performance at least once per day - much like we all did as our fixed broadband connections were in the midst of their own tech upgrades a decade or so ago.   The NPRG Data Deluge analysis  - which focused exclusively on mobile networks from the cell site upwards, makes a strong case that in for as much as 25% of the high capacity cell sites (or more) the demand will exceed 500 Mbps by 2016.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cisco is, if anything, underestimating the increase.  Everybody has experienced lagging mobile broadband performance at least once per day &#8211; much like we all did as our fixed broadband connections were in the midst of their own tech upgrades a decade or so ago.   The NPRG Data Deluge analysis  &#8211; which focused exclusively on mobile networks from the cell site upwards, makes a strong case that in for as much as 25% of the high capacity cell sites (or more) the demand will exceed 500 Mbps by 2016.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
