<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cloudscaling wants to make OpenStack webscale</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/02/09/cloudscaling-wants-to-make-openstack-webscale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/02/09/cloudscaling-wants-to-make-openstack-webscale/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 03:33:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cloudanum</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/02/09/cloudscaling-wants-to-make-openstack-webscale/#comment-808179</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cloudanum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=482973#comment-808179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good article. The success of Opensource Cloud efforts are important for all of us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article. The success of Opensource Cloud efforts are important for all of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane L Harris</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/02/09/cloudscaling-wants-to-make-openstack-webscale/#comment-807703</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shane L Harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=482973#comment-807703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[we&#039;re your &#039;MAN&#039; ????]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we&#8217;re your &#8216;MAN&#8217; ????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Bias</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/02/09/cloudscaling-wants-to-make-openstack-webscale/#comment-807685</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randy Bias]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=482973#comment-807685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is correct.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/02/09/cloudscaling-wants-to-make-openstack-webscale/#comment-807674</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[guest]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=482973#comment-807674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not positive Randy is selling &quot;webscale&quot;, since that&#039;s a marketecture term generally reserved for online applications that need to cope with massive diverse traffic. It means your application can cope with lots of transactions from lots of places and not bonk. Bonus points if it can scale to beat a trafic spike. 

 I think he&#039;s selling &quot;cloudscale&quot; which is the ability to run your infrastructure on par with what Amazon (e.g.) does and is a remarkable technological feat any way it is accomplished.  There&#039;s no real analogy to be strung between webscale and cloudscale; different worlds. Hence, one presumes, the name of Randy&#039;s company.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not positive Randy is selling &#8220;webscale&#8221;, since that&#8217;s a marketecture term generally reserved for online applications that need to cope with massive diverse traffic. It means your application can cope with lots of transactions from lots of places and not bonk. Bonus points if it can scale to beat a trafic spike. </p>
<p> I think he&#8217;s selling &#8220;cloudscale&#8221; which is the ability to run your infrastructure on par with what Amazon (e.g.) does and is a remarkable technological feat any way it is accomplished.  There&#8217;s no real analogy to be strung between webscale and cloudscale; different worlds. Hence, one presumes, the name of Randy&#8217;s company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Bias</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/02/09/cloudscaling-wants-to-make-openstack-webscale/#comment-807671</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randy Bias]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=482973#comment-807671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great article, Derrick.  Just a quick clarification: many OpenStack components are *already* web-scale.  That&#039;s why we chose it as a core technology.  The problem is that it&#039;s missing key capabilities and features that would allow a fully web-scale solution.

Best,


--Randy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, Derrick.  Just a quick clarification: many OpenStack components are *already* web-scale.  That&#8217;s why we chose it as a core technology.  The problem is that it&#8217;s missing key capabilities and features that would allow a fully web-scale solution.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>&#8211;Randy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
