<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter begins larger rollout of enhanced brand pages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/02/01/twitter-enhanced-brand-pages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/02/01/twitter-enhanced-brand-pages/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:30:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsay Dier</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/02/01/twitter-enhanced-brand-pages/#comment-806482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lindsay Dier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=479347#comment-806482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your post Colleen. I find it interesting that you point out it welcomes big brands. 
I can see what you mean, particularly as they are utilizing Twitter a fair amount, but I can&#039;t help but think these are the brands who can afford ads most, and so in many ways, perhaps don&#039;t need as much help? Some of the smaller companies perhaps cannot afford spending the required $25,000 on ads to get a brand page on twitter, but would benefit much more than already hugely established brands. What do you think? 
We discuss the benefits/detriments, and actually how useful it is to smaller companies, in more detail here: http://ow.ly/8VjPF which might be of interest to you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your post Colleen. I find it interesting that you point out it welcomes big brands.<br />
I can see what you mean, particularly as they are utilizing Twitter a fair amount, but I can&#8217;t help but think these are the brands who can afford ads most, and so in many ways, perhaps don&#8217;t need as much help? Some of the smaller companies perhaps cannot afford spending the required $25,000 on ads to get a brand page on twitter, but would benefit much more than already hugely established brands. What do you think?<br />
We discuss the benefits/detriments, and actually how useful it is to smaller companies, in more detail here: <a href="http://ow.ly/8VjPF" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/8VjPF</a> which might be of interest to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferb</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/02/01/twitter-enhanced-brand-pages/#comment-804578</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=479347#comment-804578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe the informationi is not what it is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the informationi is not what it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federico Guzmán</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/02/01/twitter-enhanced-brand-pages/#comment-804479</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Federico Guzmán]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 04:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=479347#comment-804479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How come I still don&#039;t have the new Twitter design?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How come I still don&#8217;t have the new Twitter design?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
