<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple envisions a future where clothes inform and mold your workouts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/01/17/apple-envisions-a-future-where-clothes-inform-and-mold-your-workouts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/01/17/apple-envisions-a-future-where-clothes-inform-and-mold-your-workouts/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:25:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Srinivas Rajkumar</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/01/17/apple-envisions-a-future-where-clothes-inform-and-mold-your-workouts/#comment-797894</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Srinivas Rajkumar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=471608#comment-797894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How can they patent an idea...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can they patent an idea&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael W. Perry</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/01/17/apple-envisions-a-future-where-clothes-inform-and-mold-your-workouts/#comment-797344</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael W. Perry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=471608#comment-797344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A responsibly run patent office would have rejected this patent as both obvious and cluttered with prior art. Our current patent office is run of, by and for patent lawyers. More patents mean more billable hours. It&#039;s that simple.

Apply is playing a game it ought to be fighting. Over the long run these sorts of patents and the costly legal disputes they result in will severely harm our ability to drive our economy with innovative and creative new ideas. We&#039;re already seeing that in all the legal disputes surrounding tablets. Rather than working to create the best tablet at the best price, Apple and others are trying to drive other tablet makers from the marketplace with court injunctions.

Years ago, conservative commentator William Buckley criticized a liberal law professor for using legal loopholes to put violent criminals out on the street. The professor defended himself not by claiming his clients were innocent but by arguing that, as a lawyer he had a professional responsibility to use every trick in the book to get his client free. Buckley&#039;s reply to that fits this situation perfectly. He pointed out that the professor didn&#039;t spend all his time defending thugs. He could have spent some of his time and talent closing those foul loopholes.

The same principle applies here. Apple&#039;s lawyers should be doing more than glutting a broken system with their own dubious patents. It should be working to fix a broken USPTO and devoting at least a quarter of its legal budget to creating a patent climate that rewards rather than discourages innovation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A responsibly run patent office would have rejected this patent as both obvious and cluttered with prior art. Our current patent office is run of, by and for patent lawyers. More patents mean more billable hours. It&#8217;s that simple.</p>
<p>Apply is playing a game it ought to be fighting. Over the long run these sorts of patents and the costly legal disputes they result in will severely harm our ability to drive our economy with innovative and creative new ideas. We&#8217;re already seeing that in all the legal disputes surrounding tablets. Rather than working to create the best tablet at the best price, Apple and others are trying to drive other tablet makers from the marketplace with court injunctions.</p>
<p>Years ago, conservative commentator William Buckley criticized a liberal law professor for using legal loopholes to put violent criminals out on the street. The professor defended himself not by claiming his clients were innocent but by arguing that, as a lawyer he had a professional responsibility to use every trick in the book to get his client free. Buckley&#8217;s reply to that fits this situation perfectly. He pointed out that the professor didn&#8217;t spend all his time defending thugs. He could have spent some of his time and talent closing those foul loopholes.</p>
<p>The same principle applies here. Apple&#8217;s lawyers should be doing more than glutting a broken system with their own dubious patents. It should be working to fix a broken USPTO and devoting at least a quarter of its legal budget to creating a patent climate that rewards rather than discourages innovation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
