<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why you&#8217;ll buy a new TV in the next 5 years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2012/01/16/smart-tv-upgrade-cycle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/01/16/smart-tv-upgrade-cycle/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:12:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rom</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/01/16/smart-tv-upgrade-cycle/#comment-800111</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=471187#comment-800111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well written and there are some good points. One that is totally missing the mark, for the time being, is a notion that content providers would be happy to have more viewers if they could vote for their favorite ****Idol for free. That is not happening anytime soon. SMS voting is a huge repeated revenue stream and they would be crazy to let this go away.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well written and there are some good points. One that is totally missing the mark, for the time being, is a notion that content providers would be happy to have more viewers if they could vote for their favorite ****Idol for free. That is not happening anytime soon. SMS voting is a huge repeated revenue stream and they would be crazy to let this go away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dt</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/01/16/smart-tv-upgrade-cycle/#comment-799958</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=471187#comment-799958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[me too, mac mini and any dumb tv that fits in the room. buying &#039;smart Tvs&#039; is the modern day equivalent of a tv with built in VCR or DVD it just doesn&#039;t make sense to invest in one lump that does multiple jobs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>me too, mac mini and any dumb tv that fits in the room. buying &#8216;smart Tvs&#8217; is the modern day equivalent of a tv with built in VCR or DVD it just doesn&#8217;t make sense to invest in one lump that does multiple jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Sirota</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/01/16/smart-tv-upgrade-cycle/#comment-798018</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Sirota]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=471187#comment-798018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s what I mean - http://blog.newpathnetwork.org/2011/11/tv-finally-gets-real-10-of-atv-flash-black.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s what I mean &#8211; <a href="http://blog.newpathnetwork.org/2011/11/tv-finally-gets-real-10-of-atv-flash-black.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.newpathnetwork.org/2011/11/tv-finally-gets-real-10-of-atv-flash-black.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Sirota</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/01/16/smart-tv-upgrade-cycle/#comment-798016</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Sirota]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=471187#comment-798016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Take your HDTV with 1 HDMI input, get AppleTV for $99 and firecore.com excellent atv Flash, setup a NAS from Synology and Showrss for a TV show stream. Enjoy.

I don&#039;t believe smart TVs that are not easily upgradeable, hackable will catch the imagination of the consumer. What will is saving $70 per month on cable. The first company or partnership of companies that allows the average non hacker to cut the cord on cable, effectively and legally will win this battle for smart tv. That means live news and sports available at a reasonable alacarte cost or advertiser supported. The rest of the content available in a netflix like fashion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take your HDTV with 1 HDMI input, get AppleTV for $99 and firecore.com excellent atv Flash, setup a NAS from Synology and Showrss for a TV show stream. Enjoy.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe smart TVs that are not easily upgradeable, hackable will catch the imagination of the consumer. What will is saving $70 per month on cable. The first company or partnership of companies that allows the average non hacker to cut the cord on cable, effectively and legally will win this battle for smart tv. That means live news and sports available at a reasonable alacarte cost or advertiser supported. The rest of the content available in a netflix like fashion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne-Marie Roussel</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/01/16/smart-tv-upgrade-cycle/#comment-797970</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne-Marie Roussel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=471187#comment-797970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s right! Add &quot;smarts&quot; to &quot;social&quot; and you have a hit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right! Add &#8220;smarts&#8221; to &#8220;social&#8221; and you have a hit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skeptic</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/01/16/smart-tv-upgrade-cycle/#comment-797880</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skeptic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=471187#comment-797880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, I don&#039;t see any of those bullet points attractive to me, nor do I see a &#039;killer app&#039; akin to email/web on mobile. Nearly everything on that list can be done by hooking up a PC to a TV. Nor do I see people clamoring for these &#039;interactive&#039; features which could be done just as easily with a box that meets the customer&#039;s preferred feature list.



I don&#039;t see anything in the article that resolves the balkinazation found among TV manufacturers, developers and Big Content.  

One other thing, I suspect that it wasn&#039;t just the HD content that spurred large set purchases. I&#039;m sure the cutoff of analog broadcasts had more to do with it. Take a look at all the places that have a HDTV that either had the aspect ratio off or were simply displaying SD content. If HDTV alone was a driver of those sales, one would think that more than half of the HDTVs I saw in 2009/2010 would have been properly displaying HD content. Finally let&#039;s look at one of the articles linked above.

&quot;And as time goes on, there might be another reason for consumers to begin replacing their TV sets -- or at least, the TV sets in their living rooms: They might soon become obsolete. As more and more &quot;smart&quot; TVs enter the market, the applications and app development frameworks available on the first generation of Internet-ready televisions will find themselves eclipsed by more powerful and attractive options.&quot;

This is actually a reason for me to not believe the hype of a shortened upgrade cycle. I bought a TV in 2008 that the manufacturer said would be upgradeable. The ethernet and USB ports convinced me that was true. How many updates did I get? One. Did it make any of the apps better? No. This experience has convinced me it is much better for my expenses and the environment to buy a smaller, much cheaper box that can more easily be updated and moved around to any TV/monitor I own now or in the future (assuming HDMI remains the main digital input standard). I don&#039;t want to see large numbers of perfectly fine TVs sitting in land fills.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I don&#8217;t see any of those bullet points attractive to me, nor do I see a &#8216;killer app&#8217; akin to email/web on mobile. Nearly everything on that list can be done by hooking up a PC to a TV. Nor do I see people clamoring for these &#8216;interactive&#8217; features which could be done just as easily with a box that meets the customer&#8217;s preferred feature list.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see anything in the article that resolves the balkinazation found among TV manufacturers, developers and Big Content.  </p>
<p>One other thing, I suspect that it wasn&#8217;t just the HD content that spurred large set purchases. I&#8217;m sure the cutoff of analog broadcasts had more to do with it. Take a look at all the places that have a HDTV that either had the aspect ratio off or were simply displaying SD content. If HDTV alone was a driver of those sales, one would think that more than half of the HDTVs I saw in 2009/2010 would have been properly displaying HD content. Finally let&#8217;s look at one of the articles linked above.</p>
<p>&#8220;And as time goes on, there might be another reason for consumers to begin replacing their TV sets &#8212; or at least, the TV sets in their living rooms: They might soon become obsolete. As more and more &#8220;smart&#8221; TVs enter the market, the applications and app development frameworks available on the first generation of Internet-ready televisions will find themselves eclipsed by more powerful and attractive options.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is actually a reason for me to not believe the hype of a shortened upgrade cycle. I bought a TV in 2008 that the manufacturer said would be upgradeable. The ethernet and USB ports convinced me that was true. How many updates did I get? One. Did it make any of the apps better? No. This experience has convinced me it is much better for my expenses and the environment to buy a smaller, much cheaper box that can more easily be updated and moved around to any TV/monitor I own now or in the future (assuming HDMI remains the main digital input standard). I don&#8217;t want to see large numbers of perfectly fine TVs sitting in land fills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/01/16/smart-tv-upgrade-cycle/#comment-797343</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=471187#comment-797343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It won&#039;t ever be a smart TV w/o a better UI and the equivalent of a browser under the hood.  All the rest is just tart&#039;n things up (like makeup) to see what might be useful to close the sale.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It won&#8217;t ever be a smart TV w/o a better UI and the equivalent of a browser under the hood.  All the rest is just tart&#8217;n things up (like makeup) to see what might be useful to close the sale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaybeImParanoid?</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/01/16/smart-tv-upgrade-cycle/#comment-797290</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MaybeImParanoid?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=471187#comment-797290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I dont want any more smart anythings controlling and filtering my content. Today&#039;s technology is the panopticon gone mad. Every choice and selection is monitored and noted and used to streamline ways for more products to be sold to me, products which I wouldnt have otherwise ever have cared for. The internet does this already. Now every old technology is being replaced by this new system that has a whole different set of motives underpinning it. Libraries will be eclipsed by the marketing power and convenience of businesses like Amazon.com, Barnes &amp; Nobles etc., the same way that telephone communication was replaced by Apple and Google, the same way tha the convenience of credit cards and the gains businesses got from being able to trade our purchasing info replaced more private and secure lo-tech methods like paper currency and checks, and now TV&#039;s too? Cant we just have great quality TV displays and opt out of having our every move registered by watching businesses? I&#039;m no luddite, I just am a little sick of it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont want any more smart anythings controlling and filtering my content. Today&#8217;s technology is the panopticon gone mad. Every choice and selection is monitored and noted and used to streamline ways for more products to be sold to me, products which I wouldnt have otherwise ever have cared for. The internet does this already. Now every old technology is being replaced by this new system that has a whole different set of motives underpinning it. Libraries will be eclipsed by the marketing power and convenience of businesses like Amazon.com, Barnes &amp; Nobles etc., the same way that telephone communication was replaced by Apple and Google, the same way tha the convenience of credit cards and the gains businesses got from being able to trade our purchasing info replaced more private and secure lo-tech methods like paper currency and checks, and now TV&#8217;s too? Cant we just have great quality TV displays and opt out of having our every move registered by watching businesses? I&#8217;m no luddite, I just am a little sick of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScaryPants</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/01/16/smart-tv-upgrade-cycle/#comment-797265</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ScaryPants]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=471187#comment-797265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve had a computer connected to my HDTV for years. Along with an inexpensive wireless keyboard and integrated mouse and a web cam mounted to the top of my TV. I&#039;ve had a &quot;smart&quot; tv for over half a decade. Such an easy and cheap thing to do and yet people seem to think that they need to buy appliances (ROKU etc) that only provide limited functionality or a smart TV for an experience that I&#039;ve had for a very long time. What are you doing with that netbook you bought 2 years ago? just hook that sucker up and enjoy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had a computer connected to my HDTV for years. Along with an inexpensive wireless keyboard and integrated mouse and a web cam mounted to the top of my TV. I&#8217;ve had a &#8220;smart&#8221; tv for over half a decade. Such an easy and cheap thing to do and yet people seem to think that they need to buy appliances (ROKU etc) that only provide limited functionality or a smart TV for an experience that I&#8217;ve had for a very long time. What are you doing with that netbook you bought 2 years ago? just hook that sucker up and enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faisal Kawoosa</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/01/16/smart-tv-upgrade-cycle/#comment-797197</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Faisal Kawoosa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=471187#comment-797197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Would you agree that &#039;smart TV&#039; is an alternative IPTV.  Since, IPTV couldn&#039;t pick up much, its now using the unmanaged public pipe to push in content, of course on the TV.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you agree that &#8216;smart TV&#8217; is an alternative IPTV.  Since, IPTV couldn&#8217;t pick up much, its now using the unmanaged public pipe to push in content, of course on the TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
