<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: White spaces are a go! (at least in Wilmington)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/12/22/white-spaces-are-a-go-at-least-in-wilmington/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/12/22/white-spaces-are-a-go-at-least-in-wilmington/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 16:33:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BOBBY VASSALLO</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/12/22/white-spaces-are-a-go-at-least-in-wilmington/#comment-801663</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BOBBY VASSALLO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 01:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=459447#comment-801663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lobbyists are doing their best to make certain congress sells off this spectrum to be sure only the largest carriers can continue monopolizing the airwaves, and your pocket book.  Unlicensed, counties and municipalities might even put up their own networks, spurring education, public works and SCADA projects, video-surveillance in high crime areas, or traffic control, and many other uses.  A judge did rule that Internet is as much a public utility as water or power, so the door is open for municipalities, assuming a city has the desire to actually give back to its citizens.  Novel idea.

Numerous smaller wireless companies would roll this opportunity out fast.  Alas, once spectrum is sold off to the major carriers, it will be years before availability.  Why?  They don&#039;t need to rush, as the big providers have all the business already.  

As far as a free service, I haven&#039;t seen many of them work.  However, we worked a project for a small town in Texas which put a &quot;tech fee&quot; on each citizen&#039;s water bill.  Only a dollar, it covered the monthly costs for the town.  Citizens got relief from the (usual) $49.99 a month going to the incumbent carrier and the city council got re-elected.  Win Win!  Best of all, a city could provide speeds the carriers only promise!

Bobby Vassallo
http://citywirelessconsulting.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lobbyists are doing their best to make certain congress sells off this spectrum to be sure only the largest carriers can continue monopolizing the airwaves, and your pocket book.  Unlicensed, counties and municipalities might even put up their own networks, spurring education, public works and SCADA projects, video-surveillance in high crime areas, or traffic control, and many other uses.  A judge did rule that Internet is as much a public utility as water or power, so the door is open for municipalities, assuming a city has the desire to actually give back to its citizens.  Novel idea.</p>
<p>Numerous smaller wireless companies would roll this opportunity out fast.  Alas, once spectrum is sold off to the major carriers, it will be years before availability.  Why?  They don&#8217;t need to rush, as the big providers have all the business already.  </p>
<p>As far as a free service, I haven&#8217;t seen many of them work.  However, we worked a project for a small town in Texas which put a &#8220;tech fee&#8221; on each citizen&#8217;s water bill.  Only a dollar, it covered the monthly costs for the town.  Citizens got relief from the (usual) $49.99 a month going to the incumbent carrier and the city council got re-elected.  Win Win!  Best of all, a city could provide speeds the carriers only promise!</p>
<p>Bobby Vassallo<br />
<a href="http://citywirelessconsulting.com" rel="nofollow">http://citywirelessconsulting.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Fitchard</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/12/22/white-spaces-are-a-go-at-least-in-wilmington/#comment-784822</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Fitchard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 17:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=459447#comment-784822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re right Philip, that&#039;s a more precise description of white spaces, though I don&#039;t believe it necessarily implies white spaces are guard bands. You&#039;ll have to forgive me a little creative license for the sake of brevity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right Philip, that&#8217;s a more precise description of white spaces, though I don&#8217;t believe it necessarily implies white spaces are guard bands. You&#8217;ll have to forgive me a little creative license for the sake of brevity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Leigh</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/12/22/white-spaces-are-a-go-at-least-in-wilmington/#comment-784788</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Philip Leigh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=459447#comment-784788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Puh-leez. 

TV Band White Spaces are *not* accurately described as &quot;airwave gaps between TV broadcasts&quot;. The phrase implies they are the guard-bands between individual channels -- such as between channels 7 and 8. 

In reality, TV Band White Spaces are the *unused TV channels* in a given geographic location. They can only be used as White Space if the broadcast contours of those same stations from nearby cities do not overlap the applicable geographic area.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Puh-leez. </p>
<p>TV Band White Spaces are *not* accurately described as &#8220;airwave gaps between TV broadcasts&#8221;. The phrase implies they are the guard-bands between individual channels &#8212; such as between channels 7 and 8. </p>
<p>In reality, TV Band White Spaces are the *unused TV channels* in a given geographic location. They can only be used as White Space if the broadcast contours of those same stations from nearby cities do not overlap the applicable geographic area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Ardire</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/12/22/white-spaces-are-a-go-at-least-in-wilmington/#comment-781297</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Ardire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 19:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=459447#comment-781297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FCC Chairman Genachowski good but let&#039;s get many more white space channels across America then create Super Wi-Fi.

AT&amp;T, Verizon, Comcast et al can still be friends ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FCC Chairman Genachowski good but let&#8217;s get many more white space channels across America then create Super Wi-Fi.</p>
<p>AT&amp;T, Verizon, Comcast et al can still be friends ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
