<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The next broadband battle: AT&amp;T/Dish and Verizon/Cable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/12/20/farrar-telecom-wholesale-network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/12/20/farrar-telecom-wholesale-network/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 08:43:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronald</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/12/20/farrar-telecom-wholesale-network/#comment-780503</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ronald]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 16:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=458215#comment-780503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doesn&#039;t Apple have a dis-aggregation or disintegration problem with cable[programming] if they ever want to provide a TV experience the user might really want. Like TV/Movie/Sports any way you want it with a nice UE(User Experience).

How about they start a show/movie on wireless all the while in parallel start downloading after a set-point the rest of the show via satellite, keeps data usage on wireless to a &quot;few&quot; minutes, while using &quot;cheap&quot; satellite for live sports and downloads.  How many multiplexed channels can one cram into today&#039;s satellite?

In other words if there is a technical feasibility I would expect Apple to play in that field. Neither Wireless nor Satellite nor wired can provide the data capacity in the near future,specially in the US, to disintegrate cable programming including sports. But Apple knows a thing or two about integration of different technologies and not to think along the same old straight line.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t Apple have a dis-aggregation or disintegration problem with cable[programming] if they ever want to provide a TV experience the user might really want. Like TV/Movie/Sports any way you want it with a nice UE(User Experience).</p>
<p>How about they start a show/movie on wireless all the while in parallel start downloading after a set-point the rest of the show via satellite, keeps data usage on wireless to a &#8220;few&#8221; minutes, while using &#8220;cheap&#8221; satellite for live sports and downloads.  How many multiplexed channels can one cram into today&#8217;s satellite?</p>
<p>In other words if there is a technical feasibility I would expect Apple to play in that field. Neither Wireless nor Satellite nor wired can provide the data capacity in the near future,specially in the US, to disintegrate cable programming including sports. But Apple knows a thing or two about integration of different technologies and not to think along the same old straight line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ikhan</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/12/20/farrar-telecom-wholesale-network/#comment-780268</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ikhan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=458215#comment-780268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dish and ATT not going to happened]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dish and ATT not going to happened</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
