<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Celebrity angels: a fad or the future?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/12/03/celebrity-angels-a-fad-or-the-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/12/03/celebrity-angels-a-fad-or-the-future/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:42:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: contextual network</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/12/03/celebrity-angels-a-fad-or-the-future/#comment-753323</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[contextual network]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 19:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=449005#comment-753323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Celebrity angels: a fad or the future? — Tech News and Analysis http://t.co/l79maeX2]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Celebrity angels: a fad or the future? — Tech News and Analysis <a href="http://t.co/l79maeX2" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/l79maeX2</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conrod Associates</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/12/03/celebrity-angels-a-fad-or-the-future/#comment-746191</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Conrod Associates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 14:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=449005#comment-746191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Celebrity angels: a fad or the future? — Tech News and Analysis http://t.co/1THD2c1B]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Celebrity angels: a fad or the future? — Tech News and Analysis <a href="http://t.co/1THD2c1B" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/1THD2c1B</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly Craft</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/12/03/celebrity-angels-a-fad-or-the-future/#comment-737023</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelly Craft]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 18:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=449005#comment-737023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RT @BrianHanley1: Celebrity angels: a fad or the future? — Tech News and Analysis http://t.co/qVAhp0Xj]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RT @BrianHanley1: Celebrity angels: a fad or the future? — Tech News and Analysis <a href="http://t.co/qVAhp0Xj" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/qVAhp0Xj</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomandrus</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/12/03/celebrity-angels-a-fad-or-the-future/#comment-732566</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tomandrus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 21:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=449005#comment-732566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Celebrity angels: a fad or the future? http://t.co/RO9pO9Do  If @joshbrooks is involved in them all it&#039;s the future.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Celebrity angels: a fad or the future? <a href="http://t.co/RO9pO9Do" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/RO9pO9Do</a>  If @joshbrooks is involved in them all it&#8217;s the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hampton Howerton</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/12/03/celebrity-angels-a-fad-or-the-future/#comment-732115</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hampton Howerton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 20:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=449005#comment-732115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Celebrity angels: a fad or the future? http://t.co/BGr3sNh6 #startups]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Celebrity angels: a fad or the future? <a href="http://t.co/BGr3sNh6" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/BGr3sNh6</a> #startups</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steph G</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/12/03/celebrity-angels-a-fad-or-the-future/#comment-729717</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steph G]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 06:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=449005#comment-729717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Celebrity angels: a fad or the future? http://t.co/tUohrOuA]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Celebrity angels: a fad or the future? <a href="http://t.co/tUohrOuA" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/tUohrOuA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buzzwave</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/12/03/celebrity-angels-a-fad-or-the-future/#comment-729660</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[buzzwave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 06:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=449005#comment-729660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Celebrity angels: a fad or the future? — Tech News and Analysis http://t.co/bt8HVVcA]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Celebrity angels: a fad or the future? — Tech News and Analysis <a href="http://t.co/bt8HVVcA" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/bt8HVVcA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky Gandhi</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/12/03/celebrity-angels-a-fad-or-the-future/#comment-729634</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ricky Gandhi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 05:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=449005#comment-729634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RT @BrianHanley1 Celebrity angels: a fad or the future? — Tech News and Analysis http://t.co/5rzcrj5K #in]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RT @BrianHanley1 Celebrity angels: a fad or the future? — Tech News and Analysis <a href="http://t.co/5rzcrj5K" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/5rzcrj5K</a> #in</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phuture TV</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/12/03/celebrity-angels-a-fad-or-the-future/#comment-729424</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phuture TV]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 03:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=449005#comment-729424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Celebrity angels: a fad or the future? — Tech News and Analysis http://t.co/2Iy0SENv]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Celebrity angels: a fad or the future? — Tech News and Analysis <a href="http://t.co/2Iy0SENv" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/2Iy0SENv</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Hanley</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/12/03/celebrity-angels-a-fad-or-the-future/#comment-729443</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Hanley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 03:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=449005#comment-729443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Celebrity angels: a fad or the future? — Tech News and Analysis http://t.co/qVAhp0Xj]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Celebrity angels: a fad or the future? — Tech News and Analysis <a href="http://t.co/qVAhp0Xj" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/qVAhp0Xj</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
