Why eBay is buying recommendation engine Hunch
EBay has announced it is buying New York startup Hunch, a recommendation engine created by Chris Dixon and Caterina Fake, to help improve its recommendation services. The purchase price hasn’t been announced, but venture capital investor and former TechCrunch editor Michael Arrington has said it was about $80 million.
EBay said it will use Hunch’s “taste graph” technology to provide its users with non-obvious recommendations for items based on their unique tastes. The company said it will also apply Hunch’s technology to other areas such as search, advertising and marketing, in order to better surface product information based on its customers’ tastes.
“We are engaging consumers in innovative ways and attracting top technologists to shape the future of commerce,” said Mark Carges, Chief Technology Officer and Senior Vice President, Global Products, Marketplaces. “With Hunch, we’re adding new capabilities to personalizing the shopping experience on eBay to the individual relevant tastes and interests of our customers. We expect Hunch’s technologies to benefit eBay shoppers as they browse and buy, and to bring sellers on eBay new ways to connect the right products with the right customers.”
I think the purchase could improve eBay in a number of ways. For one thing, it could help the retailer better compete with Amazon, and it keeps Hunch out of the hands of its rival, which has been well-regarded for its ability to recommend products to users based on their purchase history and preferences. EBay launched its own recommendations last year to help suggest items based on past searches, but it clearly has a long way to go in matching Amazon, which moved ahead of eBay in sales last year. Earlier this year, Om wrote that Amazon should buy Hunch because of its ability to create an interest graph that can be tied into social commerce. And as retailers like Amazon and eBay build out almost limitless inventories, matching recommendations to these products becomes even more important. Here’s what Om wrote in April:
“Amazon should buy Hunch. It could use the decision engine to help customers sift through the ever-expanding array of offerings and make purchasing decisions. That little kernel of an idea still looms large in my thinking, especially as I wonder what the future of media and e-commerce looks like….Interest graph, for me, is the underpinning of a new kind of e-commerce experience. Think of it as a new kind of social commerce experience that goes beyond the notion of group shopping (Gilt Groupe, Groupon), shopping communities and recommendation engines,”

Hunch could allow eBay to create some very smart recommendations based on more than just searches. I think past search or purchase history is limiting, and sometimes an inaccurate predictor for recommendations because a lot of gifting happens on these sites, which can skew the suggestions. Hunch uses what it knows about a person’s likes and interests along with answers to personal questions to help understand a user’s tastes, then makes very intelligent recommendations based on those answers and their correlation to other data. Hunch originally began a consumer-facing service but changed course last year to license its technology to retailers who participated in its Hunch Partner Platform.
I think this could also help with eBay’s self-described goal to become a technology-driven company. The company is in the midst of a big push to become much more than just a seller of goods. You could see that at eBay’s X.commerce Innovate conference, where it showed off its X.commerce platform for retailers and developers. EBay has been on a buying binge recently, buying a number of companies that have helped it aspire to be a sort of plumbing or infrastructure for e-commerce. It has bought GSI, Magento, WHERE, Milo and RedLaser, much of which is being put into the new X.commerce platform and also its bid to enable payments in-store. Hunch is a very intelligent company that uses a lot of machine learning and data mining to create recommendations. And it has a smart team led by the well-known Dixon, who can also help build out eBay’s presence in New York
Adding Hunch could be another tool for X.commerce customers, who could plug smart recommendations into their business operations. EBay is really trying to build a commerce operating system for businesses, and it’s putting all these new assets together into one big resource to help enable sales for retailers and developers. Increasingly, retailers need better ways to engage consumers and personalize service to the tastes of their users. By providing a tool like Hunch to X.commerce customers, it can make the platform that much more attractive.
I think the move makes sense for eBay and follows through on CEO John Donahoe’s attempts to remake the online seller into a technology company. Donahoe said at the X.commerce conference that eBay is not done buying up companies and it looks like it will continue to add more pieces to its growing collection of e-commerce assets.
Here are a couple of video interviews we did earlier with Dixon:
Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

> EBay said it will use Hunch’s “taste graph” technology to provide its users with non-obvious recommendations for items based on their unique tastes.
Yes this sounds credible
> The company said it will also apply Hunch’s technology to other areas such as search, advertising and marketing, in order to better surface product information based on its customers’ tastes.
This sounds like total BS because there are superior methods to Hunch ‘taste graph’
I agree with you on this Steve. Part one is where this deal is going to be focused.
I’m not so sure. There are lots of companies doing very compelling things with “taste graph” technology (including Kevin Rose’s mobile app Oink and list-making community Ranker.com). Hunch may not be at the forefront, but I can see eBay deriving a lot of hidden benefits from having all of this new data feeding into their search and advertising systems.
Well, the Ho has to keep buying companies: he at least looks as though he is doing something that way. What a shame it is that he destroys everything he touches; this guy is utterly delusional … Sheesh!
Study Sees PayPal Adoption Down Among Multi-Channel Merchants
“Twenty-two percent of EPIS merchants who had accepted PayPal on their own websites and off-eBay stores in October 2010 stopped accepting PayPal as a payment method on those sites in October 2011.
“There were 19% more merchants who accepted credit cards on their own websites and stores in October 2011 than in October 2010.”
http://www.auctionbytes.com/cab/abn/y11/m11/i21/s02
And Visa’s “V.me” is on the way, too. Halleluiah, there will be a better life for all after the clunky PreyPal finally sinks to the bottom of the ocean, along with its ugly mother, the rusting old hulk “eBay”. (I’m wondering, which one do you think will hit the sandy bottom first?)
“Visa launches PayPal competitor V.me with developer community to back it up”
http://venturebeat.com/2011/11/16/visa-launches-paypal-competitor-with-developer-community-to-back-it-up/
All the details of the coming PreyPal killer on the V.me site at: https://www.v.me/
Goodnight clunky PreyPal, your days—at least outside of whatever will ultimately be left of the Donahoe-devastated eBay Marketplace—are finally numbered …
Generally speaking, the card companies are simply transaction aggregators for their partner banks, and Visa’s V.me is simply a more sophisticated extension of their existing service designed to better suit online activity: you will be able to pay with any major credit/debit card, including Visa, MasterCard, American Express, and Discover.
Ultimately V.me may not be any cheaper for merchants than PreyPal for “on-credit” purchases but they at least conduct their transaction processing directly with the payer bank concerned (you’ll get an immediate, firm acceptance or rejection of the transaction as you do with an online card transaction—no clunky PreyPal surprise reversal the following day after you have already dispatched the goods), and, if something does go wrong, the system offers a professional transaction mediation process for on-credit transactions. …
Enron / eBay / PayPal / Donahoe: Dead Men Walking.
Taste graph sounds cool and smart, but what is it really? Can Hunch really make recommendations that differentiate one pair of earrings, or kitchen stool, from another? Do Ebay users really just decide to buy a product in a different category than what they went on the site for in the first place? I’m confused about how Hunch’s model integrates to Ebay. On Hunch, they ask many questions to figure out where you fit on the “graph”- are they going to ask similar questions on Ebay? Are users (beyond the technorati) really interested in that experience? Or are peoples’ purchases and clickstreams going to determine where they fit on the graph? Does the typical Ebay user really input enough data in any given category to be useful? Aren’t there already many behavioral targeting and collaborative filtering companies doing exactly that?
I’ve gotta say, I think this is a bad deal.
Firstly, eBay should realise that the future isn’t “crowd-based” recommendations, thinly veiled as “personalization” – the future is individual, predictive personalisation based on implicit (i.e. behaviour) and explicitly (e.g. demographic) given information. Whilst the data that Hunch have/can collect is valuable for “people like you also bought”, I doubt it will have much value in “you will like”. There is a difference. I don’t think eBay will have realised how basic the data might be – calculating relationships is simple; predicting purchases is harder.
Secondly, $80m isn’t much, in the grand scheme of things, and it feels like Hunch had just given up – it’s been a long time since 2007, and their “taste graph”, whilst originally innovative, has fallen behind the times.
Thirdly, I find it unusual that eBay have bought a consumer-facing company for what is effectively a boring topic. There are lots of companies offering varying levels of expert technology in the space – eBay could have chosen a much better technology for the longterm, especially those companies that have a solid go to market strategy.
ever use hunch? i know there’s smart dudes over there but, come on, shit is totally useless.