<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What comes after the MacBook Air</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/11/07/what-comes-after-the-macbook-air/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/11/07/what-comes-after-the-macbook-air/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 23:59:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael W. Perry</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/11/07/what-comes-after-the-macbook-air/#comment-673043</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael W. Perry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 19:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=434409#comment-673043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quote: &quot;The things that really wowed people about the Air — the incredible thinness, the deletion of non-necessary features, and the responsiveness of the machine — have to be improved upon.&quot;

I&#039;ve yet to hear anyone with a MBA praise that &quot;incredible thinness.&quot; That&#039;s the sort of thing pundits gush about. No one complains about &quot;the deletion of non-necessary features,&quot; but that&#039;s certainly not a factor that wows anyone. It&#039;d be like being wowed by a new car that replaces a full-sized spare tire with one of the tiny, temporary ones. Those dropped features are tolerable because they doesn&#039;t affect how people use their MBA.

What they do praise is the quick boot time and the responsiveness. That&#039;s where the MBA really hit a home run and why it&#039;s selling. Of course, for about $900 less, I got the same results by adding a OWC SSD to my MacBook. As I tell friends, for $900 I&#039;ll lug around a couple of extra pounds.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote: &#8220;The things that really wowed people about the Air — the incredible thinness, the deletion of non-necessary features, and the responsiveness of the machine — have to be improved upon.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve yet to hear anyone with a MBA praise that &#8220;incredible thinness.&#8221; That&#8217;s the sort of thing pundits gush about. No one complains about &#8220;the deletion of non-necessary features,&#8221; but that&#8217;s certainly not a factor that wows anyone. It&#8217;d be like being wowed by a new car that replaces a full-sized spare tire with one of the tiny, temporary ones. Those dropped features are tolerable because they doesn&#8217;t affect how people use their MBA.</p>
<p>What they do praise is the quick boot time and the responsiveness. That&#8217;s where the MBA really hit a home run and why it&#8217;s selling. Of course, for about $900 less, I got the same results by adding a OWC SSD to my MacBook. As I tell friends, for $900 I&#8217;ll lug around a couple of extra pounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pk de cville</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/11/07/what-comes-after-the-macbook-air/#comment-672916</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pk de cville]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=434409#comment-672916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Waiting for a 15&quot; MacBook Air Pro model.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waiting for a 15&#8243; MacBook Air Pro model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shock Me</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/11/07/what-comes-after-the-macbook-air/#comment-672873</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shock Me]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 14:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=434409#comment-672873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I suspect more and more sensors and hardware features will make their way from iOS devices to the the MacBook. The trackpad will likely grow in size and in its range of gesture recognizing abilities.

Pixel densities will grow and stop at just over 300 ppi as the Mac OS underneath moves toward resolution independence. 

Desktop Mac will get even larger interaction surfaces to pair with the mouse. There may be some attempt to introduce 3D but not very quickly. 

If yields go up and costs go down the hard drive will disappear from the MacBook Pro line as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect more and more sensors and hardware features will make their way from iOS devices to the the MacBook. The trackpad will likely grow in size and in its range of gesture recognizing abilities.</p>
<p>Pixel densities will grow and stop at just over 300 ppi as the Mac OS underneath moves toward resolution independence. </p>
<p>Desktop Mac will get even larger interaction surfaces to pair with the mouse. There may be some attempt to introduce 3D but not very quickly. </p>
<p>If yields go up and costs go down the hard drive will disappear from the MacBook Pro line as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Wallace</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/11/07/what-comes-after-the-macbook-air/#comment-672810</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tyler Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 09:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=434409#comment-672810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should Apple migrate to their OS X userbase to OS X on ARM in about 5 years? While no Rossetta type soft landing would be available, it must be tempting to them. Could they reap the profits of the switch from laptops to ultrabooks with Intel now, and meet windows 8 on ARM in the market by 2016?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should Apple migrate to their OS X userbase to OS X on ARM in about 5 years? While no Rossetta type soft landing would be available, it must be tempting to them. Could they reap the profits of the switch from laptops to ultrabooks with Intel now, and meet windows 8 on ARM in the market by 2016?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/11/07/what-comes-after-the-macbook-air/#comment-672750</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 04:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=434409#comment-672750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Umm, it never had an ethernet port. Good job... cub reporter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm, it never had an ethernet port. Good job&#8230; cub reporter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>