<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introducing the 5-watt server that runs on cell phone chips</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/11/01/introducing-the-5-watt-server-that-runs-on-cell-phone-chips/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/11/01/introducing-the-5-watt-server-that-runs-on-cell-phone-chips/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 18:48:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yukiko Yoda</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/11/01/introducing-the-5-watt-server-that-runs-on-cell-phone-chips/#comment-746971</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yukiko Yoda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 17:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=430867#comment-746971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Introducing the 5-watt server that runs on cell phone chips http://t.co/hEWZ5FnC]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Introducing the 5-watt server that runs on cell phone chips <a href="http://t.co/hEWZ5FnC" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/hEWZ5FnC</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yukiko Yoda</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/11/01/introducing-the-5-watt-server-that-runs-on-cell-phone-chips/#comment-746972</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yukiko Yoda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 17:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=430867#comment-746972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Introducing the 5-watt server that runs on cell phone chips http://t.co/hEWZ5FnC]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Introducing the 5-watt server that runs on cell phone chips <a href="http://t.co/hEWZ5FnC" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/hEWZ5FnC</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suman De</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/11/01/introducing-the-5-watt-server-that-runs-on-cell-phone-chips/#comment-695982</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suman De]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 07:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=430867#comment-695982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Introducing the 5-watt server that runs on cell phone chips http://t.co/2wnCgMqN]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Introducing the 5-watt server that runs on cell phone chips <a href="http://t.co/2wnCgMqN" rel="nofollow">http://t.co/2wnCgMqN</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/11/01/introducing-the-5-watt-server-that-runs-on-cell-phone-chips/#comment-671978</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 08:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=430867#comment-671978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Atom is x64. Oh... wait... that was sarcasm? wasn&#039;t it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Atom is x64. Oh&#8230; wait&#8230; that was sarcasm? wasn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnyi1222</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/11/01/introducing-the-5-watt-server-that-runs-on-cell-phone-chips/#comment-671958</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[johnnyi1222]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 06:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=430867#comment-671958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Atom procs are x86 by their nature.  Except for the IA64 series Intel has not produced an architecture other than x86 for damn near 30 years. (64bit is called x86_64 for a reason). But yes the Atom would be a better comparison than the Xeons for power consumption.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Atom procs are x86 by their nature.  Except for the IA64 series Intel has not produced an architecture other than x86 for damn near 30 years. (64bit is called x86_64 for a reason). But yes the Atom would be a better comparison than the Xeons for power consumption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barb Darrow</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/11/01/introducing-the-5-watt-server-that-runs-on-cell-phone-chips/#comment-671432</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barb Darrow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 20:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=430867#comment-671432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yes, it should have. Atom is a more relevant comparison than x86...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, it should have. Atom is a more relevant comparison than x86&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hermionie</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/11/01/introducing-the-5-watt-server-that-runs-on-cell-phone-chips/#comment-671233</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hermionie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 13:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=430867#comment-671233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why the nagging ? In this globalized society keep your mumbling about American sentiment. This World is huge and there is lots of space to grow for everybody.
  
Don&#039;t behave like stupid bullying child.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why the nagging ? In this globalized society keep your mumbling about American sentiment. This World is huge and there is lots of space to grow for everybody.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t behave like stupid bullying child.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikeb</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/11/01/introducing-the-5-watt-server-that-runs-on-cell-phone-chips/#comment-671212</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mikeb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 12:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=430867#comment-671212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They should have compared this to an atom chip
My netbook with all. Components runs at 12 watts]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should have compared this to an atom chip<br />
My netbook with all. Components runs at 12 watts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Souther</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/11/01/introducing-the-5-watt-server-that-runs-on-cell-phone-chips/#comment-671210</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Souther]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 12:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=430867#comment-671210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll rant a little bit, too...
Your are USA, you people alone are not America, I&#039;m american too, but I&#039;m not form USA. America is not YOUR country, it&#039;s a continent. See? even I have the right to be pissed out!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll rant a little bit, too&#8230;<br />
Your are USA, you people alone are not America, I&#8217;m american too, but I&#8217;m not form USA. America is not YOUR country, it&#8217;s a continent. See? even I have the right to be pissed out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: somnolent</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/11/01/introducing-the-5-watt-server-that-runs-on-cell-phone-chips/#comment-671187</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[somnolent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 10:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=430867#comment-671187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And I for one welcome our new, free to innovate, overlords!

Don&#039;t blame he press for reporting what’s going on in the world while the USTPO, all on their lonesome, are doing a bang up job of stifling all innovation in the US which is actually what will lead to the US becoming a non-competitive, bit-part player]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I for one welcome our new, free to innovate, overlords!</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t blame he press for reporting what’s going on in the world while the USTPO, all on their lonesome, are doing a bang up job of stifling all innovation in the US which is actually what will lead to the US becoming a non-competitive, bit-part player</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
