<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rometty to hold IBM to cloud-and-services course</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gigaom.com/2011/10/25/rometty-to-hold-ibm-to-cloud-and-services-course/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/10/25/rometty-to-hold-ibm-to-cloud-and-services-course/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:12:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barb Darrow</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/10/25/rometty-to-hold-ibm-to-cloud-and-services-course/#comment-668219</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barb Darrow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=427475#comment-668219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yes, Aro, IBM has downsized a ton. Not unlike it&#039;s competitors.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, Aro, IBM has downsized a ton. Not unlike it&#8217;s competitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aro</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2011/10/25/rometty-to-hold-ibm-to-cloud-and-services-course/#comment-668192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=427475#comment-668192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder if she will continue the same cynical policies of laying off 1,000&#039;s of people as a short-term cost-saving measure, then try to hire the &quot;same kind&quot; in a few years when business is &quot;up&quot; with lures of how wonderful it is to be an IBM&#039;er.   

Right - I was laid off a few years ago, and now positions like mine then are being advertised by IBM. I will never be going back to that disloyal employer who demands a ridiculous degree of loyalty from its &quot;greatest asset - our people&quot; (unless of course it is my last resort - might as well be as cynical as IBM).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if she will continue the same cynical policies of laying off 1,000&#8242;s of people as a short-term cost-saving measure, then try to hire the &#8220;same kind&#8221; in a few years when business is &#8220;up&#8221; with lures of how wonderful it is to be an IBM&#8217;er.   </p>
<p>Right &#8211; I was laid off a few years ago, and now positions like mine then are being advertised by IBM. I will never be going back to that disloyal employer who demands a ridiculous degree of loyalty from its &#8220;greatest asset &#8211; our people&#8221; (unless of course it is my last resort &#8211; might as well be as cynical as IBM).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
