4 Comments

Summary:

The uptake of the iOS 5 update for Apple customers was fast and far-reaching. But what did that look like to the ISPs who provide the bandwidth for Apple customers to update? Here’s a chart that shows what Sonic.net saw.

ios5-feature2

The uptake of iOS 5 among Apple customers last week was fast and far-reaching, which is of course good news for Apple. But what did that look like to the ISPs who provide the bandwidth for Apple customers to update? One of them, Sonic.net, an independent ISP in the San Francisco Bay Area, just released this chart, which sheds light on the huge bump in traffic an iOS update can bring.

Here’s what the company said about the chart on its blog:

The answer is that yes, there is a substantial increase in traffic the day after the update was released. We host the Apple update content locally on AkamaiCDN servers in our datacenter, so this doesn’t affect our network edge, but you can see the bump in traffic from the CDN cluster itself here.

Last Wednesday Apple released the latest version of its mobile operating system, iOS 5. Apple confirmed that 25 million users had already upgraded to iOS 5 by Monday. Localytics then reported Monday that one in three devices that could be upgraded to iOS 5 were, within five days of the OS’s release.

  1. Wrong, the same day we’re updating ubuntu to 11.10, iOS5? nobody :D LOL

    Share
  2. We live in 2011 and ISP’s still can’t cache similar traffic? Have the router guys been sleeping for 30 years? Come on. Ios should be off no impact to any proper designed network.

    Share
    1. I may be missing something but… “We host the Apple update content locally on AkamaiCDN servers in our datacenter” suggests they are doing just that, serving from their CDN rather than directly from Apple’s server.

      Share
    2. That’s what the content distribution network (CDN) services are for. Apple or any other company providing data to the network knows best where their traffic will be destined and how to cache it properly.

      The ISP’s should be clear pipes, no caches. They shouldn’t care about the content. Their job is to have more than enough of capacity (it’s cheap in 2011), fast (low latency), and redundancy. And seriously, a few Gbit/s isn’t that big of a deal in 2011.

      PS. Yes, ISP caches may still be valid issue in some remote islands with very limited bandwidth. But they are not the solution for anything.

      Share

Comments have been disabled for this post